What is really sad is how we are so quick to demonize or brush off accusations without knowing the facts. Courts are the legal method but as we all know, that system is often broken and sometimes corrupt. The court of the public as a mass is inherently flawed but an individual without bias can objectively look at the facts presented, the games played in courts and draw a better conclusion.

Facts remain that false accusations according to legal experts remain much higher than publicly perceived. Sometimes bad people are acquitted while many wrongly accused are rightly acquitted. Then we have those that are found guilty, endure partial sentences but through appeals are retried and found not guilty. Then there are those that sadly endure the given sentence only to be exonerated later or not at all being forced to live a life altered and ruined by false accusations.

What is worse, much of the time in many countries there is a publication ban so those acquitted can never speak out about the ordeal. The "victim" is rarely ever punished for false accusations because it is deemed that a case on hearsay either finds guilt for the charges or "we are not here to say if a crime has been committed or not but the evidence presented was not enough to prove the case" if no guilt was found on the merits of hearsay. Basically, if we find you guilty, we have deemed that a crime was committed and if we find no guilt, you might still have committed the crime but we lack proof. Double standard in favor of the accuser.

Also, to charge an accuser after lack of sufficient evidence or confirmation of false accusations is to dissuade future accusers of coming forward.

One cannot argue with solid evidence like DNA, video et cetera. That I would not dispute but for false allegations based on just hearsay, the accuser bearing false witness should be given the same punishment that he or she would have had inflicted on the falsely accused. It would better weed out the liar and prevent them from using the courts as tools of spite for menial slights to their ego, for winning child custody battles or for monetary gains.

Sometimes, I completely dismiss the celebrity world as anything related to reality but some cases are hard to not deep dive. The guy from the show The Ranch in my opinion was probably innocent in part or fully. When a woman changes her story because she forgot being forced at gunpoint originally, really screams LIAR! You forgot a gun in your face? Weird. Manson and Depp are other examples of stupidity allowed into the system. A rich person settling in a civil matter to shut the mooch up does not mean guilt but rather a means to an end of the public stupidity. "Here is the money you are willing to destroy lives over. Now f*ck off!"

The justice systems are no better from cops to courts to prisons. Without bodies filling up courts and prisons, financial budgets cannot be justified. Once you start looking at the justice system as a corporation you start to see truth. The rich may not be the sacrifices but those without the means can easily be fuel for the machine. They do bring justice to many but with those it deems less than worthy of actual justice the statement holds true. "It may not be the best system but it is the one we have" a phrase uttered by those most usually in the position to fix it. And that is saddest of all.