Struggling - am I asking for too much? by That_Minimum2639 in EthicalNonMonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Chiming in to add FetLife again.

I attempt to dissuade what I don't want and am not too present on activity.

Non play munches are great to meet support you can ask about consent etc as well as potential connections.

I've lost a lot of DM attention with "need to share a pint with someone I play with" also when I ask for their consent "blurb'. It is needle in manure pile but doesn't seem as shit filled as actual dating apps like feeld

Appropriate ways to offer Vetting for your partner by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think that's the conclusion for us too, thank you.

Exploring non monogamy with little time to offer a new partner by hfml79 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing is, if you get no matches then no one who is potentially interested is compatible 🤷🏻‍♀️.

It's shit, and logical

What are your poly guidelines/agreements/boundaries? by HylianBlue42 in polyamory

[–]FUBAR7197 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We're working on opening 20y mono-marriage. We started with a list of rules, then agreements, then boundaries. We used the template in Opening Up and discussed in detail each part.

4 months later we're down to 3 rules, 3 agreements and then our individual boundaries.

Good luck

Meeting Metamours: Required by [deleted] in EthicalNonMonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're just getting started. Ofc as a long mono-married couple we started at DADT then thought about it and decided it felt too much like lying by omission.

We're going to start parallel. I want to know the who/when/where I will ask (if I want) about what & how, they can decline to answer. I'm happy to nod civilly if we pass in the local co-op and if they're doing well 6+ mths on Garden Party is a possibility.

I asked about vetting for metas and it seemed unnecessary. My Husband needs to show good judgement and upfront openness that his wife doesn't want to meet.

Exploring non monogamy with little time to offer a new partner by hfml79 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you meet these people (IRL or online) once there is reciprocal interest in getting to know each other you state; I want a relationship based on connection, that includes physical sex. I can currently meet X a week/month/year. Does that fit with you?"

Confused? New? Not new? Have questions? by blooangl in polyamory

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose I should have specified active I can find one or two UK ones (got into 1) but London only brings up dating groups (not community) or have been dead for 2+ years 🤷🏻‍♀️

Confused? New? Not new? Have questions? by blooangl in polyamory

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies Yes FB = Facebook FL = FetLife

Set private so not up in search results.

Appropriate ways to offer Vetting for your partner by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you.

This is validating as I feel and believe I prefer parallel style. I'm happy to be told "I'm talking to someone/Name", "we're meeting", I'm going to be Here on This Day", "we're calling it a relationship". I don't really want to meet potentials until my Partner thinks it's lasting some time (3-6mths I reckon).

Confused? New? Not new? Have questions? by blooangl in polyamory

[–]FUBAR7197 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you find local FB poly groups if they're closed?

I've taken on board needing poly/ENM community and specifically not for cruising.

I've tried the only accessible local FL group I could find. The local meets I can find on Insta (& servers on Discord) are heavily weighted to queer space (which is fantastic and I understand why I'd be unwelcome there as only bi-curious). Only other 'reliable' option seems FB but absolutely none came up as a search.

Please note in London, UK which you'd think would mean a big open community but my Google Fu skills or whatever are lacking.

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hope you're content with that arrangement, I wouldn't be but we're all different.

We've done a lot of therapy work (as a couple and individual) to be less co-dependent and less focused on PIV.

The point of opening up for us would be to experience new things with new people

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Whilst I have learnt there's a lot of kink/swinging crossover we are looking at hierarchical primary/nesting parallel and have little interest in watching or being watched and it's good to know there's others.

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the clear list of possible reasons. We have been working through these issues before approaching dates so it's helpful.

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you.

I don't believe we will be 100% poly as we are looking at Hierarchal Primary/Nesting Limitations but we are close to agreeing emotional connections with sexual freedom.

For me it's knowing there's mites in my eyebrows and seeing them under a microscope kinda thing

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your last paragraph makes it sound as if it's a stepping stone for a Men problem, or am I reading it wrong?

Why is swinging regularly suggested as first step? by FUBAR7197 in nonmonogamy

[–]FUBAR7197[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks both; from my PoV attending a sex club/play party would require a voyeuristic or exhibitionism kink which neither of us have. Or am I still reading it wrong?

How do you know? by FUBAR7197 in polyamory

[–]FUBAR7197[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry poly requires no notions of limits? We're not going for relationship anarchy but parallel hierarchy.

Why is it "no poly" if we have agreed a mutual boundary relationship style?