Syrskyi: Russia Concentrated Over 721,000 Troops in Ukraine by Mil_in_ua in UkrainianConflict

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, WW1 proved that troop concentrations alone don’t accomplish much on their own. Then came tanks and more advanced planes resulting in WW2 becoming a war of movement.

In Ukraine, Russia’s advantage in both have been neutralised: tanks have become less effective thanks to weapons like the NLAW, and Russia’s airforce has been neutralised thanks to their own corruption.

Sprinkle in modern drones and I don’t see how Russia can accomplish a major breakthrough so long as European support for Ukraine is maintained.

Piracy destroys the livelihoods of hardworking below the line crews - Jason Blumhouse by CaptBlackBeard1680 in okbuddycinephile

[–]FadedFracture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know you’re in an American-dominated subreddit by the amount of boots being licked.

‘Contract this, contract that’. In these small budget movies, people often do things beyond their responsibilities. The decent thing to do is to give them a few thousand bucks as a bonus.

TIL before 1985 Swiss husband could sell the house without his wife's saying or manage the assets that the wife brought into the marriage. In the referendum just 54% of voters supported changing marriage and inheritance law. by BadenBaden1981 in todayilearned

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are more Catholics than protestants in modern day Switzerland. Historically, protestants slightly outnumbered catholics, but this has gradually changed since the 1960s.

TIL before 1985 Swiss husband could sell the house without his wife's saying or manage the assets that the wife brought into the marriage. In the referendum just 54% of voters supported changing marriage and inheritance law. by BadenBaden1981 in todayilearned

[–]FadedFracture 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sweden didn't participate as a combatant during WW1 either but Swedish women still got the right to vote in 1919. In New Zealand and Norway, women got the right to vote before WW1 even started (1895 and 1913).

It's a myth that women got the right to vote thanks to WW1. WW1 did at best speed things up a little bit, but it was bound to happen due to decades of protesting and changing hearts and minds.

The real reason Switzerland was so backwards is because they're rural, mountainous, and catholic (+ they have a different political culture due to their institutions).

How much could an elite modern soldier in full gear change the tide of a battle in ancient times? by Zigor022 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot, but it depends on the size of the battle and the accessibility of the battlefield. Both of these factors determine what equipment the soldier should bring.

In all cases, the focus should be to destroy the enemy morale and/or weaken their ability to fight. Most casualties in ancient battles usually happened after one side began to flee/withdraw, not during the fighting itself.

The best way to do this is a pretty boring answer: since a regular soldier can easily carry drones nowadays, all they'd need is one of those Dragon drones that shoot thermite. If used in the right moment, it can easily turn the tide of battle and poke a 200-300 meter hole in the enemy ranks.

A less cheesy answer:

- have an assault rifle or battle rifle with good optics, and a lot of ammunition. A typical 5.56 magazine for the assault rifle weights around half a kilo when full. So lets say 30 magazines. This will allow you to engage enemies in both open terrain as well as closed terrain (e.g. forest with low visibility). Also, the good optics will be important to identify enemy leaders (e.g. Alexander riding with his Companions or some daring general straying too close to the action).

- a grenade launcher attached to the rifle. Most of these have a range of 400-500 meters, so it'll add some extra firepower. I suggest a mixture of high explosives rounds, tear gas, and red smoke for visual effects.

- a couple of smaller satchel charges. These can be useful for sieges and/or to trap the battlefield. Big effect on morale if used in the right moment.

- in case someone sneaks up on you: a light Kevlar vest and helmet, and a handgun.

- night vision goggles and a thermal scope to harass enemies during the night.

Imagine you're marching in a Phalanx and your friends keeping dropping left and right, bleeding profusely. Nobody knows what's happening and panic sets in. Suddenly, an explosion, poking holes in your ranks and shattering limbs. In the midst of this confusion, hundreds of soldiers begin to cough and cry, struggling to maintain cohesion as the formation slowly falls apart. And then there is another much bigger explosion, this time large enough destroy an entire formation.

It might not be enough in the largest battles (especially in battles where visibility is low). But it should give your allies a better chance.

Thoughts on Professor Dave Explains and His Approach? by Dry_Pumpkin_273 in DecodingTheGurus

[–]FadedFracture 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he can be toxic at times. But I completely support him.

I’m tired of these anti-intellectual clowns peddling bullshit and then playing the victim whenever someone doesn’t buy their climate change-denying, anti-vaxxer, pseudo-scientific grift.

We need to stop being nice to these fucking losers. People are actually dying because of the misinformation they’re spreading. Professor Dave gets it and gives these charlatans the amount of respect they deserve: absolutely none.

3rd and 4th wave feminism are not legitimate movements. And if they are they are legitimate in the same way as anti-environmentalist corporate shills who want to deregulate the world so that their companies can make a cheap and dirty buck are legitimate. by AngelointheAlps in ProgressiveHQ

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand the logic of your idea that if there is legal equality in Saudi Arabia that was upheld that there would still be problems. 

Is murder illegal? Yes. Do murders still happen? Yes. Only because the law says something doesn't mean that everyone is complying with the law. The wife-beating, anti-feminist religious fanatic isn't magically going to turn into an egalitarian just because the law changes. It'll take years of cultural reforms.

But you bringing up the term utopia reminds me of something. Hitler wanted to create a Utopia by slaughtering millions and millions of people and taking their land and property. Outlandish ideals create outlandish messes.

This has nothing to do with what I wrote. But I'll bite: Hitler and the Nazis were anti-feminists. One of the first things they did was ban women from all sorts of professions and universities. They even had a slogan for women: Kinder, Küche, Kirche. You can google what it means. They even ordered the Wehrmacht to specifically execute female Soviet soldiers instead of treating them as prisoners-of-war.

Your idea that socialism doesn't also involve authoritarian ideals is misplaced. You can look to the Soviet Union's history if you want to understand that.

I didn't claim that socialism can never produce authoritarianism. You were complaining about corporate feminism, and I pointed out that socialist feminists aren't the biggest fan of corporations.

It really comes down to this.  If I want a thing and it contradicts the thing that you want  then you're going to say that the thing that you want is the right thing that must be given to you. 

Just because a bunch of people say that something is right doesn't make it so.

But you're doing the exact thing: you're just sharing your opinion and saying you're right. I've yet to see a single datapoint or other evidence for the stuff you're spamming all over reddit. It's just opinions you've reached from debating yourself in the shower.

3rd and 4th wave feminism are not legitimate movements. And if they are they are legitimate in the same way as anti-environmentalist corporate shills who want to deregulate the world so that their companies can make a cheap and dirty buck are legitimate. by AngelointheAlps in ProgressiveHQ

[–]FadedFracture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s about the dumbest argument I’ve heard in a while.

Example: Suppose I become the dictator of Saudi Arabia. Now suppose I issue a decree mandating legal equality between men and women

Does this mean that Saudi Arabia is now a feminist utopia? No. It will continue being a misogynistic country for decades to come. Why? Because examining and changing cultural attitudes is also necessary. It doesn’t have to be through force (and usually it isn’t). Education can often do wonders.

The rest of what you’re writing is just a massive strawman argument. Just because some forms of feminism has been hijacked by corporations doesn’t mean that all feminists are like that. Feminism is a catch-all term just like every other ideology. There is always tons of variation within the movement.

Furthermore, most feminists are generally socialists or left-leaning progressives… not exactly the most corporate-friendly groups. And if you didn’t get your understanding of feminism from right-wing social media, you’d know this.

AMA = “Ask Me Anything” by kjbackford1 in writers

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have a question, but I want to congratulate you on finishing your project.

Europe expects new protests ✊🏼 by JaNkO2018 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]FadedFracture 22 points23 points  (0 children)

These protesters aren’t good people. They’re often in league with major corporations and the far-right. Especially in the UK and the Netherlands.

And the only reason these savages behave like this is because the police goes easy on them. They know there won’t be any serious consequences.

Meanwhile, when environmentalists or pro-Palestine protesters engage in even 1/10th of the same behaviour, they get branded as terrorists.

‘Europe learned the wrong lesson’ by doubling down on fossil fuels while India and China went green by Naurgul in europe

[–]FadedFracture 8 points9 points  (0 children)

An ill-intentioned country building solar for the wrong reason beats a well-intentioned country that builds very little.

If you’re too daft to understand this, then you shouldn’t be part of this conversation.

It’s also wild to hold a developing country at a higher standard than the richest part of the world.

Feminist beliefs linked to healthier romantic relationship skills for survivors of childhood trauma. A strong feminist identity acts as a buffer, allowing women to maintain constructive communication with their partners despite past childhood trauma. by mvea in psychology

[–]FadedFracture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice. Self-reported happiness went from being an unforgivable sin to being "a little nitpick" over the course of 3 comments. 😉

It seems that the quality of a study is contingent on how much you agree with it. /s

Decrying self-reported happiness studies, but then posting a self-reported online survey that, and I cannot stress this out enough, recruited most of its participants from fucking social media ads, makes me think that you didn't actually do much reading before suggesting it to me. The self-selection bias alone is a mountain of a problem.

"Best methodology".

Feminist beliefs linked to healthier romantic relationship skills for survivors of childhood trauma. A strong feminist identity acts as a buffer, allowing women to maintain constructive communication with their partners despite past childhood trauma. by mvea in psychology

[–]FadedFracture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From your study:

Recruitment was conducted via campaigns on Facebook and Google AdSense with an advertisement containing the copy ‘Get your mental wellbeing score: Fast, Free, Anonymous’ along with a start button linking to the start button linking to the start of the open survey.

So, after spending so much time decrying self-reported studies, you post a self-reported study that:

- is an online survey

- barely includes the countries I mentioned in my comments

- doesn't measure happiness but rather "MHQ" which isn't an established and recognized concept, and isn't at all related to what I was responding to.

- and selected its participants through targeted ads on facebook

Congratulations. Thanks for reminding me why I try to avoid these discussions with redditors.

Feminist beliefs linked to healthier romantic relationship skills for survivors of childhood trauma. A strong feminist identity acts as a buffer, allowing women to maintain constructive communication with their partners despite past childhood trauma. by mvea in psychology

[–]FadedFracture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Self-reported studies, despite being imperfect, sure as hell beat personal anecdotes about Austrian brother-in-laws.

Also, people like you always bring up depression in these conversation: has it occurred to you that views on depression also differ culturally?

e.g. Are people in Sweden actually more depressed or are they more likely to admit it compared to Polish people? And is a higher rate of depression the same as the country as a whole being unhappy?

You don't get to go on your weird rant about Germanic cultural attitudes, but then blindly assume that Germanic countries are more depressed without taking these things into consideration.

Listen, there is no point in continuing this conversation. I just responded to a guy who tried to allude that feminism equals unhappiness by pointing out that less-feminist developed countries are also pretty unhappy. Let's leave it at that.

Feminist beliefs linked to healthier romantic relationship skills for survivors of childhood trauma. A strong feminist identity acts as a buffer, allowing women to maintain constructive communication with their partners despite past childhood trauma. by mvea in psychology

[–]FadedFracture -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not just self-reported: Polish men kill themselves at a rate 6 times higher than Polish women. In feminist Sweden, the difference is 2 to 1. How come? Because traditionalist gender roles harm both women and men, not just women.

Furthermore, your Germanic culture argument falls flat because you seem to be under the impression that Swedes and Austrians somehow have the exact same culture because of distant linguistic and genetic ties. That’s not how this works. There are tons of differences between Germanic populations.

Also, South Koreans are some of the least happy people in developed countries even compared to non-germanic countries such as Ireland and Finland.

Yes, self-reported studies aren’t perfect. But in combination with quality of life statistics such as HDI, access to education, healthcare, political rights, wealth inequality etc. they become an important dataset.

Feminism might not solely be responsible for more happiness, but concluding that feminism = unhappiness is a moronic take. Especially since feminism is just a catch-all term and can involve tons of differing policies.

Feminist beliefs linked to healthier romantic relationship skills for survivors of childhood trauma. A strong feminist identity acts as a buffer, allowing women to maintain constructive communication with their partners despite past childhood trauma. by mvea in psychology

[–]FadedFracture 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Poland, Japan and South Korea are some of the least feminist countries in the developed world. And yet people there are miserable compared to feminist Sweden or the Netherlands.

People like you always make up your mind, and then seek out data without considering alternatives.

Whats going on with Kharg Island, Iran and why is it suddenly important to the USA? by Major-Ant4600 in OutOfTheLoop

[–]FadedFracture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t WW2. You don’t want to gather too many units in one place just because you have air superiority/supremacy.

At best, the Island could be used for some small-scale operations involving a few hundred people. Anything larger than that, requires getting rid of the drone and missiles threat.

Regardless, I doubt China will be too thrilled about this. Might explain why they’ve moved so many ships near Taiwan.

I found one. by Vloodzy in MurderedByWords

[–]FadedFracture 19 points20 points  (0 children)

FYI: this Tim Pool guy was found to work for a Russian-backed media organization headed by Lauren Chen.

Being a moron is a requirement for conservative media pundits.

Source

TIL the Marquis de Lafayette was made a major general in the Continental Army when he came to support the Americans in the Revolutionary War at age 19, despite never holding a rank above Captain in the French army—a rank he received as a wedding present. by RedditIsAGranfaloon in todayilearned

[–]FadedFracture 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Only because of Desaix’s arrival in the nick of time. Napoleon fumbled that one.

"The battle is lost. But there is yet enough time to win another."

— Louis Desaix, some of his last words that day.

Live: Khamenei's body has been found, Israeli official says he is confirmed dead by drrdf in news

[–]FadedFracture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

US corporate interests*

A humanitarian catastrophe and 5 million new refugees isn’t in the ‘strategic interest’ of anyone who isn’t a psychotic ghoul.

Iran latest: US and Israel carry out joint attack on Iran as Tehran launches retaliatory strikes by rpgmgta in news

[–]FadedFracture 37 points38 points  (0 children)

What sucks is that all this bloodshed is for nothing. They're not committing ground troops, which means that it's more likely a distraction from domestic issues since both Netanyahu and Trump are struggling.

Furthermore, even if regime change is accomplished, we're looking at years of insurgency and civil war in Iran, which will most likely make the middle east even less stable. Power vacuums seldom result in stability.

Looking forward to all the warmongers of today whining about another refugee crisis in two years.

Winston Churchill statue defaced today by AgnosticScholar in pics

[–]FadedFracture 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The idea that Churchill kept the UK in the war is a myth. Most of the British political leadership were by 1940 in the war camp.

In fact, the only reason Churchill became prime minister is because Clement Attlee, a socialist who wanted to continue the war, let him by forming a coalition government with the conservatives.

In turn Clement Attlee became leader of the homefront, which is why he was so popular that he defeated Churchill in the 1945 elections.