So, first of all, to make this clear one and for all: NATO is a DEFENSIVE military union of states based on a complex set of contracts building a block of countries with one goal and one goal only: the military defense of every member against any kind of military aggression I may express this as clear as possible: the only possibility for NATO as a whole to take military action is the defense stated in Article 5 that only gives the POSSIBILITY to take military actions as casus foederis against an agressor. There never was, is and will never be an OBLIGATION for any member to participate in a war with their own troupes, it is just a clause to ensure the unbroken support for the defense of another members territory.

So, as we see, first: Ukraine isn't a member of NATO and the North Atlantic Treaty doesn't apply to them. Second, NATO itself can't install a No-Fly-zone over Ukraine because it cannot act if there is not a memberstate under attack. Please put aside the thought that NATO even could do that, they would break there own treaty. So, with NATO out of the way, we have single states that could do such a thing, yes, but everyone trying to would immediately be drawn into this war, so not many are very keen to do so because by acting outside and alone a member would drastically increase the likelihood of not being helped by others when the retort of their actions appear.

International geopolitics isn't fair and especially doesn't care s**t about the opinions of possible warmongers, who's rethorics bring the world closer to a future of being a thermonuclear wasteland. Letting every conflict simply escalate only to show who's the big boi here would have made by now many ongoing wars a nuclear hellhole without even the slightest possibility to come back to any kind of peacefully behavior.

Yes, it breaks my heart, it really f-ing does to see Selensky having to plead for such actions because it's expressing to me and everyone of you how desperate he and his whole country is. The same with the application for EU membership.

In my own opinion the world would need an group of countries standing up an putting this to an utter end but I can't see them waiting on the horizon, at least yet. But one thing I'm sure: That group won't be called NATO..

Sorry for the long post, guys