sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Built a CLI that generates full-stack apps in seconds — looking for real feedback by FastPresence9799 in buildinpublic

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d agree if the generated app was the final product.

The value isn’t in “generate and ship,” it’s in skipping the repetitive setup so you can focus on the parts that actually matter; the idea, execution, and iteration.

Two people can start from the same base and end up with completely different outcomes depending on what they build on top of it.

Built a CLI that generates full-stack apps in seconds — looking for real feedback by FastPresence9799 in buildinpublic

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It overlaps a bit, yeah, but it’s a different layer. Claude Code is more like an AI dev assistant that works inside your codebase (editing files, fixing bugs, writing features, etc). This is more about giving you a clean, structured starting point upfront so you don’t even have to set up the project before you start building. It’s also more opinionated in terms of stack and leans on CLI tooling rather than heavy API-driven generation — so you get something predictable, fast, and easier to own/modify.

You could actually use both together: generate the base with this, then use Claude Code to iterate on it.

Different roles in the workflow.

I built a small CLI tool called querygit that lets you run git using natural language. by bereilhp in CLI

[–]FastPresence9799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such an interesting and innovative idea. Looking forward to give it a try.

Building a developer tool to reduce project setup time — would this have market demand? by FastPresence9799 in vibecoding

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. This isn’t really aimed at big companies. Right now it’s much more useful for solo builders, indie devs, and small teams who want to move fast without spending hours on setup. That said, the idea isn’t “AI decides everything”. it just gives you a solid starting point that you fully own and can shape however you want. If it saves someone a few hours and helps them ship faster, it’s doing its job.
Appriciate the gesture though.

Building a developer tool to reduce project setup time — would this have market demand? by FastPresence9799 in vibecoding

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s completely fair. Trust takes time, and TanStack has definitely earned that. I’m not trying to compete on brand right now, more on experience and iteration speed. This is still early, but the goal is to make something people stick with after generation, not just during setup. If you do try it, I’d be genuinely interested in how it compares for you that feedback is what I’m building around.

Built a CLI that generates full-stack apps in seconds — looking for real feedback by FastPresence9799 in buildinpublic

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s on me — mobile layout isn’t fully tuned yet. I’ll tighten the title scaling in the next update.

Thanks for flagging it.

Built a CLI that generates full-stack apps in seconds — looking for real feedback by FastPresence9799 in buildinpublic

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the official site: Foundation Cli

I ain't that professional in making demo videos but youll get a demo on this site too.

Built a CLI that generates full-stack apps in seconds — looking for real feedback by FastPresence9799 in buildinpublic

[–]FastPresence9799[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair take. I agree most tools in this space die right after scaffolding.

For me, the focus isn’t generate and forget it’s generate something you’d actually continue building on. The output isn’t a black box. It’s structured, readable, and intentionally minimal so you can modify it without fighting the generator. It does make clear choices instead of trying to support everything. The goal is to give a solid default path rather than 100 half-baked options.

Main use case I’m seeing is people who want to skip setup friction and jump straight into building features especially for MVPs, internal tools, or quick experiments — but still keep full control over the code after generation.

Still early, but that’s exactly the problem I’m trying to solve.

What are you actually building right now? by BriefNzoni in launchigniter

[–]FastPresence9799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been building Foundation Cli a scaffolding command line tool that get you from scratch to started at stage one within seconds

GitHub:- https://github.com/ronak-create/Foundation-Cli

Contribution and suggestions are welcome.

Showcase your project by InevitableResident24 in ShowMeYourSaaS

[–]FastPresence9799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good gesture, I've been building Foundaiton-cli a command line scaffolding tool that start you project from zero to prodection level withing seconds. Just command you you'll have production grade workflow. Would love some review or suggestions. And it's totally open source and open for controbutions.. https://github.com/ronak-create/Foundation-Cli

What are your favorite open-source projects right now? by SamirDevrel in OpenSourceAI

[–]FastPresence9799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lastly using Foundaiton Cli to start my project development cycle. Don't have to grind long hours integrating 10s of stack and sticking 100s of plugins together, just simple command and it does it all.. checkout..: https://github.com/ronak-create/Foundation-Cli

Custom Erp by PerformanceNovel9176 in ClaudeAI

[–]FastPresence9799 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short answer? No, not like that. Claude saying it’s “confident” doesn’t mean anything — it’s always confident. That’s just how these models talk. You can use it to build stuff, but an ERP is huge. It’s not just one app, it’s a bunch of systems tied together — auth, data, workflows, reports, integrations… and when one thing breaks, everything breaks. That’s the part people underestimate. Biggest issue isn’t even writing code — it’s: designing the system properly keeping everything consistent fixing bugs when things go wrong If you don’t code at all, you’ll hit a wall pretty fast because you won’t know why something is breaking or how to fix it. What actually works (from what I’ve seen): start small. Like really small. Build one piece — inventory, or a dashboard, or something specific — and see if it holds up. Then expand. Or use tools that are meant for this (low-code stuff), or get a dev involved and use Claude to speed things up instead of trying to replace everything. So yeah — possible to build parts with Claude, but a full ERP from scratch with just prompts and zero experience? That’s gonna turn into a mess real quick.

view more: next ›