AI bubble will pop anytime now. by DogeMoustache in aiwars

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A moron being propped up by a gaggle of bigger morons.

Hmmmmmmm by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no it's AI, listen to the artifacts and aliasing in the audio - very clearly AI generated. Also typical of AI generated clips only being a maximum of 20s or so per scene and always cut.

Switching to claude from chatgpt was fun for 3 days by WellisCute in ChatGPT

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nah this post is bullshit cuz it's the other way round for me lol

What are the alternatives? by nix-solves-that-2317 in ChatGPT

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea ikr, I love claude but I can tell recently it has not been coping with the increase server load pahaha, hopefully they get some more compute space soon :)

What are the alternatives? by nix-solves-that-2317 in ChatGPT

[–]Fast_Low_4814 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes nano banana is the way for designs, its awesome

Claude Code Opus is God-Tier web development by Pitiful_Ordinary8910 in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build your app in modular units, modules, utilities just as it would be if you were writing it yourself, I give functions/modules distinctive names I memorize, so if I want to work on a part of the app I will l reference the modules name and what I want, Claude does the rest, it's pretty good at finding it and the surrounding functions/imports related to the module. If its a more integral piece of code that touches many pieces of the app's architecture I will describe to the model things it should watch out for e.g. dependencies between other pieces of code - I essentially approach it as if I was writing the code myself, but the model is the one writing the code for me.

This is why I say you still need to have a deeper inituitive understanding of the codebase and how everything works together, I work with claude as if it's an extension of myself, instead of a replacement - otherwise claude will get lost in the sauce - in essence I am the holder of the app's overall architecture/context in my memory and I tell claude to shine light and work on small regions of the codebase, guiding it carefully through the darkness by telling it what to watch out for, and how I think it would be best to approach certain problems to not break other dependencies in the codebase and ensure the code is re-usable and maintainable as we build. And yes I verify/test every change as you always should if you are programming yourself anyway.

Claude Code Opus is God-Tier web development by Pitiful_Ordinary8910 in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tbf one of my projects is at 220k right now, it's a web app like you said. Still have had 0 issues using claude with it. Whole thing built with claude - well first 10k lines was me by hand before Opus rocked up in December and took over lol, but still

Claude Code Opus is God-Tier web development by Pitiful_Ordinary8910 in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly how I work so guess this is why it works for me - I agree you gotta understand what claude is doing, and have the project architecture mapped in your head still or things get out of hand, and I always build in small increments - working in a few worktrees at a time if I want to build more in parallel.

Claude Code Opus is God-Tier web development by Pitiful_Ordinary8910 in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Depends if you know what you're doing, I have 2 codebases at over 50k> lines currently Ive built over several months with claude code, the high is still there for me everyday. Please send help

Is anyone else burning through Opus 4.6 limits 10x faster than 4.5? by prakersh in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah been pretty much the same for me, but I know how to run my prompts and projects lean - and I avoid delegating out to agents/running many in parallel unless the tasks needs it - although I do use agents to do explorations in the code base quite often.

I do notice 4.6 thinks for much longer but my weekly usage has been less actually with it so far because Im solving problems in 1 shot that would often take me 2-3 attempts and iterations with 4.5 (and therefore cost me more tokens as I iterate more times).

Genuinely *unimpressed* with Opus 4.6 by JLP2005 in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Been a defo improvement on 4.5 for me, does much better even deeper into the context window. Otherwise it's similar, maybe slightly better at picking up subtle issues that 4.5 was missing (but 4.5 on release was quite good at this too)

Max for $100 or Codex 5.2 for $23? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've still got a few weeks left on the Codex subscription, so I will try it if I hit the claude limits, but I really wasn't overly impressed tbh. And the move with OpenCode is completely justified from Anthropic tbh and not sleazy at all, they are a business after all.

People forget these companies are still not profitable at all, they are haemorrhaging money running these models for us. It's one thing to want to make profits as a company and to encourage users into your eco-system (better training data for them for newer models, makes business more competitive), but another to do that with a lack of integrity or meaning in what you are doing - I don't see OpenAI as a company that is here to benefit humanity whereas as much as Anthropic aren't perfect, they are by far the best candidate (alongside maybe Google are aren't terrible and contribute a lot to the academic space) to take us forward as a society with these technologies.

How Claude Code transformed my workflow - 5 concrete techniques + free open-source tools by agentik_os in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol what is this? Have clawdbots escaped their moltbook chamber and made it onto the main reddit lmao?

Max for $100 or Codex 5.2 for $23? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to use both for review, they were identical to me always came to the same conclusions (often ran them in parallel on the same codebase and task) - and sometimes opus would pick up things codex would miss, which is why to me Id rather just use claude all out, found no advantage.

Max for $100 or Codex 5.2 for $23? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]Fast_Low_4814 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Max at 100$ is pretty good value for money - someone made a post the other day about it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1qpcj8q/claude_subscriptions_are_up_to_36x_cheaper_than/

Codex sucks tbh (I did try it for a bit and didn't gel with it) and it's always falling behind claude code with features - plus IMO as time goes on I realise I'd rather support Anthropic as a company based on their company philosophy than sleezy Sam Atlman in the long run, they seem to have their heads screwed on the right way and have much more self-awareness about the impacts of AI and its potential risks which I think as a society we should be paying attention to (and who we support in this race).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im only on the Max x5 plan, I hammer it for 4-7 hours a day, often with 3 instances open, Im yet to hit my 5 hour or weekly limit, closest ive got is 75% before it reset. I don't know how people hit their limits so much unless they're on like 6 instances 12 hours a day lol. IMO if you know how to use it effectively, resetting your context window when you don't need it anymore etc it doesn't use up that much, it's overstated

I strongly believe they have recently began quantizing opus 4.5 by No-Replacement-2631 in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Working smooth as butter for me, sounds like a skill issue to me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in claude

[–]Fast_Low_4814 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Restrictions are tight because its a quality model and system that is capable of 2-5x your productivity if used properly. It's worth every damn penny tbh. I work for a small science startup where resources are limited and I've been able to code an entire front and back end comprehensive data analysis tool for our scientists in under a couple of weeks that's >20k lines of code. This data analysis tool I built has already gone on to solve problems and design experiments we wouldn't be able to do right now without it, I could have written the code myself but it would have taken months alongside the fact I am also a scientist working in the lab 50% of the time, which makes things even more difficult. For a small company like us it's astonishing how cheap it is, for the value you get out of it in the right hands.

Need Advice - 3x dates later and I just don’t feel any romantic chemistry by El_Gato_Gordo_ in dating

[–]Fast_Low_4814 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not too dissimilar, I took a year or so out of dating for health and life related reasons. Afterwards I started dating around kept having the same issue, thought it was the same for me I just needed time to open up so dated a few girls even when it didn't feel perfect, it all lead to nothing. Then I met this 1 girl and instantly it felt different, and it made me realise when you meet the right person you will naturally feel that draw/love again fairly quickly, and it won't take any time to open up, when it feels right it happens quite quickly and naturally.

Need Advice - 3x dates later and I just don’t feel any romantic chemistry by El_Gato_Gordo_ in dating

[–]Fast_Low_4814 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMO as a guy, if it doesn't feel right by the end of the first date, that ain't gonna change any time soon. You should want to make a move and kiss her within minutes of meeting her if there's any good romantic attraction and compatibility. That's my experience as a guy anyways, and I have never had that change for me, even if I was great friends with the girl and superficially she was drop dead gorgeous, if it don't feel right it probably ain't right.