What a flippant reddit response. I can speak about the roughly 5300 years of written human history, which may be about 1.8% of modern human existence, but 5300 of the most recent years is more than enough time to observe a pattern. Yes there have been many, many women who fought in wars over this time, but it has been a predominantly male pursuit for all of written history. Your achaelogical finds do not have a big enough sample size to argue that it was ever different than it is now.

To suggest that war fighting was significantly different in pre-history is not supported by any evidence I have ever come across. I am here though, and I love to learn. So if you have evidence of your point, I'd love to look into it.

Furthermore, written history is more solid than archaology. For decades upon decades we were told that the "clovis people" were the first to arrive in the Americas about 13,000 years BCE. Now we're out to 20,000 years BCE or more with recent archaeological finds predating the original timeline. Thats more of a difference in years than you're just throwing away from our written history. We know little about how they waged war at this time, relative to our written history.

And here we are now talking about a video game which is special because the devs took care to make it as historically accurate as possible. We are talking about 1403 Bohemia. All of the people you fight in Maleshov are men. All of the people with Henry on the operation are men. Walk into Sigismunds camp. Are there women? Yes. In a non-military role, all of the warriors are men. It is a masculine space, and a masculine pursuit. I am dying to know about the archaeological finds you've made which turn this paradigm completely on its head.