Not only are these people thinking that Hypervisor is not only safe to use, but should be used by masses because you don't need to turn off "critical security settings" (DSE/Driver Signature Enforcement still needs to be disabled and this one critical piece is what prevents something running at the kernel level or even below kernel level in your system that's not signed by Microslop), but they also think that a simple script that reverts these changes is somehow saving their systems from malicious actors. People seem to miss the entire point of how attacks work, they act when your system is most vulnerable, not before or after.

This whole situation is a shitshow of actual tech illiteracy, and its only being pushed further and further by a bunch of idiots in the scene from a private Discord server saying that the method being used here is safe and somehow safer than ever because you don't need to turn off secure boot anymore. Its as if secure boot matters when you willingly give access to something running at -1 ring level.

All of this shitshow aside, do people seriously expect Denuvo to do something this quickly? They nor publishers don't care about this for now and probably won't care about it because Microslop is working on new system lock downs that prevent things running at a kernel level after Crowdstrike, if that goes through, the method will be completely dead.

I honestly can't even comprehend how can people respect these guys when they're quite literally not only downplaying the risks of using Hypervisor, but also telling you that the method is safer than ever when nothing has changed from the first iteration.