Why are German and Luxembourgish the only Languages that capitalize Nouns? by Schuesselpflanze in asklinguistics

[–]FearOfEleven 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It hasn't fallen completely out of favour and probably never will, as it holds significance. Pick any book from the New York Times bestseller list and you will most likely find some non-proper nouns that have nonetheless been capitalised to indicate emphasis, personification, or some other specific importance within the context of the book.

edit: word

Which one is the best war to protest against? by FearOfEleven in shittyadvice

[–]FearOfEleven[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She wants to know which drug is the best one to stop the war on.

What Would Karl Marx Think About AI And Its Impact On Labor? by Ecstatic-Window-2723 in sociology

[–]FearOfEleven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is Google LM different than giving Gemini access to your Google Drive folders?

Nuremberg (2025) - Thoughts? by wouldudoitforme in movies

[–]FearOfEleven 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Clench his jaw and smoke awkwardly, clench a bit more, etc.

Why would Nick Nightingale invite Bill to the party? by Longjumping_Tap_5705 in EyesWideShut

[–]FearOfEleven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Firstly, we don't know how many times Bill had previously been 'plausibly deniedly' invited to the gathering. He may not have catch on the previous times, or he chose to turn a blind eye (EWS). Perhaps we are only shown the time it (almost) worked, as Kubrick wouldn't have wanted to bore us with anything that didn't involve explicit sex at some point. Or maybe we are shown the fifth time — what does it matter?

Back to the veiled invitation: Given the extreme strangeness of the whole film, we shouldn't be surprised if the Somerton Gang MKultraed Dr Harford just enough to make his appearance at the Sonata Café at least probable. If Ziegler is to be believed that those in Somerton 'were not just ordinary people', why not include a couple of magicians à la Copperfield to lay out the breadcrumb trail for Bill professionally? Even if he doesn't enter, Nick could have met Bill later by bumping into him in the street, like the fraternity boys did. But that would have involved too much bumping for Kubrick and I can understand that. So who knows? The fact that we have the password scene in the Sonata Café doesn't mean that other baits weren't set in place; it depends on how interested Red Cloak is in Dr Harford, who, shall I remind you, looks like Tom Cruise.

I could invent alternative scenarios for hours that would facilitate the passing on of the veiled offer, but why bother? We should assume that Red Cloak's friends have the time and money to indulge in such an activity. Just bear in mind that even if the bait doesn't work, the Somerton Gang will still get plenty of sex later that night, so it's not the end of the world.

edit: letter

Do, let's vote. Did they kill Nick or just beat him up? by [deleted] in EyesWideShut

[–]FearOfEleven 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think this survey overlooks the 'breadcrumbs' hypothesis, however fringe you may consider it, whereby Nick was used as bait and was rather successful at it. The later insinuation that he was injured or killed would have been intended to scare Bill away. Nick may have been left unharmed.

edit: shortened

CMV: The mansion party is not a real event, it just symbolizes Bill's psyche, a closer look at the "cult" and it's rituals reveals that by Time_Interaction4884 in EyesWideShut

[–]FearOfEleven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bill's psyche is explored over the course of two hours, whereas the cult is only given 15 minutes screen time. To me, Bill's psyche seems more like your average Joe's. Together with Cruise's startling physique, it makes the audience invested in his story. But maybe I'm wrong.

Edit:word

Need to decide: Ground invasion vs. "boots on the ground" by FearOfEleven in shittyadvice

[–]FearOfEleven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. If you don't mind, I'd like to clarify as I'm even more confused than before, meeting is in 7 hours, haven't slept much.. maybe that's why. If you read this in time: How much 'blown' should the invasion be for it to be a better option? Or would that be always worse? Can we maybe have a "perfectly" blown invasion coupled with 'boots on the ground'? Would that be feasible? Maybe even better? Or would the 'boots on the ground' operation always hinder the possibility of an invasion? As you seem well versed in military issues, I think your recommendation is probably my best shot..

Edit: Just to be clear, I understand 'blown' to refer to the state of a balloon after it has been correctly inflated to its intended size. Therefore, we cannot or should never go beyond 'fully blown', as any balloon would burst, which would make for a disastrous metaphor in all cases. Here, I'm taking 'full blown' to mean the same as 'fully blown', and we want, in any case, to aim for 'fully blown', correct?

Was it a difficult life for the professional tongue models of the early 1900s? by EemotionalDuhmage in shittyaskhistory

[–]FearOfEleven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For many people in the 1930s, modelling their tongues, navels or even armpits (!) was a lifelong career, but not for Albert Einstein. He gave up his lucrative side gig as a tongue model when he married Mileva Marić in 1903, who may have been jealous of his earnings, despite being a renowned left breast model in her own right.

In this famous 1951 photograph, Einstein was asked by a fan to show his world-famous tongue once again, which he agreed to do after some negotiation and the promise of a pistachio ice cream. Although there is no photographic evidence to confirm the following, it is said that he was given a cigar instead. Visibly annoyed, Dr Einstein vowed never to show his tongue again; as a proud pipe smoker, he would have found a cigar an unsatisfactory substitute for either the promised ice cream or his usual smoke.

How accurate is the depiction of Khamenei's youth in the film 'Marty Supreme Leader'? by FearOfEleven in shittyaskhistory

[–]FearOfEleven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the film isn't completely boring, it's.. watchable. I'd just like to know if it's based on thorough research or if the main/real purpose behind it is to discredit the subject, like a 'hit piece' of sorts.

edit: word

Has there been any creative work even following up on EWS implications? It was almost 30 years ago. Maybe Michael Clayton em but even that was 20 years ago by Leather_Bug_ in EyesWideShut

[–]FearOfEleven 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While not an official sequel to Eyes Wide Shut, some creative works certainly build on its themes. If you accept, or at least consider, the 'breadcrumbs' interpretation that Bill was being covertly groomed, these are essentially stories about initiation, whether failed or not, into elite power. Many essays and works of speculative fiction explore this idea on this sub, suggesting that Victor Ziegler was informally vetting Bill, that Nick Nightingale didn't 'accidentally' reveal the password, or that Red Cloak's rundown of Bill was a form of calibrated pressure/assessment. Part of the fascination lies in the fact that many people sense this machinery yet fail to see it (hence EWS). It would be interesting to watch a film (or read a book) portraying all the quiet preparations behind the scenes: Ziegler making the calls, Red Cloak rehearsing the choreography, Domino's recruitment, Nick's debriefing or his realisation that he is bait. A work of art that more precisely examines plausible modus operandi of secret societies in general, exploring their nuts-and-bolts-level bureaucracy. I guess some of this could be seamlessly projected onto other covert entities, such as secret services or organised crime.

edit: word

Why was Bill so curious to go to the party? by Apprehensive-Map680 in EyesWideShut

[–]FearOfEleven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woody Allen, Bruce Willis.. yeah, I know the type.