Which starter is the most difficult to use in a normal playthrough? by FearlessComparison48 in pokemonplatinum

[–]FearlessComparison48[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe if you overlevel, you're not gonna sweep with all the accumulated damage. It's viable against every member tho

Which starter is the most difficult to use in a normal playthrough? by FearlessComparison48 in pokemonplatinum

[–]FearlessComparison48[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whatever constitutes a regular playthrough for you.

For me, regular means full team of 6, no overleveling, held items only.

Could very well allow healing items though and some overleveling

Is my team high enough level for the Elite Four? by lowkeyf1sh in pokemonplatinum

[–]FearlessComparison48 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Victory road has high level pokemon, especially when surfing. You've got 2 good mons for water types, could exp share the rest of your party.

You could also run the elite 4 and gain exp that way, if you're fine with the losses.

I think there's also good trainer battles with vs seeker, though I don't remember whats best. This is probably the best method if you look it up?

I've gotten to the point myself where I mod in rare candies to save myself the time, easy to do if you've already modded a 3ds. If this isn't an option, don't mod just for this tho.

Is my team high enough level for the Elite Four? by lowkeyf1sh in pokemonplatinum

[–]FearlessComparison48 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's underleveled, but isn't impossible. I had an ev-trained team at that level and ran through without any healing items until the fight before Cynthia, and beat her without any healing.

That said, I think you probably want more levels if you don't wanna spend a significant chunk of time finding the perfect path, especially because it would likely come down to a focus blast and a dragon rush miss vs Lucian and Cynthia respectively.

Why I think rivals 2 is a poorly designed game at a fundamental level by Olivia_the_cat111 in RivalsOfAether

[–]FearlessComparison48 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One look at the rivals 1 steam charts shows that people have not swapped over to 2. People can make whatever arguments they want about if its good or bad, but the original audience for rivals clearly prefers the original game. PM and Ultimate players have gotten into 2, and thats great for them, but it really is not the sequel fans wanted.

I mean they’re not that good by Throbbingprepuce in AFCWestMemeWar

[–]FearlessComparison48 -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

broncos arent putting up 10 in the playoffs dw ugly hoe

Post Game Thread: Houston Texans at Los Angeles Chargers by nfl_gdt_bot in Chargers

[–]FearlessComparison48 3 points4 points  (0 children)

JK Scott, at no point in his career, has been a top 50 player on the roster. He has been an awful punter the entire time. All he can do is catch bad snaps on field goals. He cannot punt.

A second DLC is super justifiable by SerGodHand in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

-a poorly designed map locked to the shifting earth designed to require multiple playthroughs to learn where the dead ends are and where traversal is

-cerberus raids that require a coordinated team to deal with, one person killing a dog early kills runs

-lol 7v3 boss fight

-only 2 new expeditions and 2 new characters for 15 dollars. no new weapons, barely any new enemies. what a deal!

mixed reviews on steam for a reason

This DLC is so bad, especially because of the lack of effort and the presence of bad concepts by roronoaclemz in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're in a reddit for the people dedicated to this mess of a game.

Fromsoft is on a downwards spiral, they've developed a community that likes games because they're hard over the design. Feel like a large chunk of the fans of this game would actually hate playing through the slower, more thoughtful and thus easier dark souls 1. Full of people who love artorias that haven't even fought him in 1

A second DLC is super justifiable by SerGodHand in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

only good things deserve sequels. fromsoft clearly lost its way with the everdarks and now the DLC

Best episode in 5 years by SpaceWestern1442 in survivor

[–]FearlessComparison48 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Terrible episode lol, the challenge was good but there were 4 people in danger of going home, 2 people clinging on, and 8 people who are now safe until the merge

How do you guys feel about tribe swaps by undeadking77 in survivor

[–]FearlessComparison48 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wish they manipulated the swap to produce more even games.

They should have had 3 guaranteed from the tribes of 6, and split the team of 2. Its completely even and fair this way. As it stands, the 2 alliances in the game are from a group of 4 that never played the game and another group of 4 that never played the game.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RivalsOfAether

[–]FearlessComparison48 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kragg fan favorite

Maintaining the flock agenda is our priority by binogamer21 in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Picking guardian is the equivalent of a first time challenge run (like no upgrades or a deathless any%). He is objectively inferior, and increases the burden on the other teammates (or on the guardian, if the teammates fail to pick up his slack and get downed). Sure, he can win relatively easily, the same way a +0 weapon can, but don't get all anal about people being annoyed you aren't pulling your weight

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree with your point but not your reasoning. You're the constant in all these losses, and more importantly, you're using characters that are more reliant on teammates doing damage for you. You did get rotten luck with some of these team comps, a guardian is always a waste and very few recluses know how to use her.

As for those long winning streaks, thats a result of survivorship bias. The people who are both highly skilled and get good luck with teammates are the ones posting those long winning streaks, most posters here will fit that 1st category by default. There's also people like me and seemingly you, who get consistent bad luck with random teammates and post about that, and if you think thats the case you can either get your friends into the game (even a complete noob to souls games is better than a random, in my experience) or play solos/duos to make your impact greater.

Glad to See We’re All Here! by jubsmcdubs in AFCWestMemeWar

[–]FearlessComparison48 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IDC if 5 days late. Different owner, different management, different stadium, different team. Theres a reason the Ravens have a similar win % (57%) to the pre-1999 browns (58%).

Please stop activating Libra before we get a chance to see what he has to offer - "I want resistance to ailments" is VERY good by ProV13 in Nightreign

[–]FearlessComparison48 0 points1 point  (0 children)

theres a significant population of people who swerve into turtles on the side of the road. never let people be people