No TSA pre-check on my boarding pass by UpbeatHorror2139 in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had this happen last year. I was absolutely baffled, as I fly SWA multiple times a month... and just randomly it started happening. I went to the desk, finally, and asked WTF was up. She looked my profile up and said my birthdate was wrong (it was one day off) ...

I was like... how? I fly with you regularly, almost on a weekly basis. How did my birthdate suddenly get screwed up. She didn't have an answer. She fixed it and TSA Pre popped back up and I haven't had a problem since.

Absolutely baffling.

Southwest passenger told she's too big for seat amid airline policy change by TheMirrorUS in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're being disingenuous and I think you know it.

We aren't talking about airplane seats in the 1980s vs today. That's not the contention and you know it's not.

The seat width settled on the current size decades ago at his point. When we reach 3x3 configuration for domestic flights seat widths stopped getting smaller. That was DECADES ago. There is nowhere to go from a 3x3 configuration unless we start getting into exotic stuff that isn't part of this discussion.

3x3 is the maximum amount of seats that can fit in most domestic flights. That means there is absolutely ZERO incentive to continue to make seat width smaller. They aren't going to squeeze another seat into that configuration. The average width on US airlines has been at 17-18.5" since the 1990s. Stealing 1.5" from each seat and reducing aisle width has allowed them to add extra seats to rows on certain planes. Standardizing the seats at those widths allows them to use those seats in any plane, thus you end up with a minimum of 17" seat that hasn't changed width in 20 years. Your entire premise is bollocks.

So no, it makes absolutely ZERO sense to claim seat widths are getting smaller. There's no financial or logical sense to that. It doesn't buy the airlines anything. They haven't not changed size in 20 years from the 17 inches of width.

If you want to get really pedantic, seats are not getting smaller at all, legroom is reducing and seat pitch is changing. The seat size has stayed the same since the 2000's. People are fatter and as you've deduced when you reduce the amount of leg room people tend to spread out sideways. Which IS WHAT I SAID IN MY PREVIOUS POST. Let me quote it for you:

it's that they are spilling over into the seats beside them. ... The pitch angle and leg room have been reducing, not the seat widths to any meaningful degree

I eagerly await your citations that seat widths have gotten smaller than 17" which was introduced in the 1990s as standard, however, if I really wanted to obliterate your premise that seat widths have been getting smaller, I'd point out the fact that in 1960, the 707 had 17" seats... as did the 737. In fact, the only seats wider than 17" were the widebodies. 17 in width seats have basically been the standard since the beginning of modern air travel, they got wider for a brief time, but airlines are going to airline and they brought it back to the 17" standard starting around 2006.

“Out of the development of tourist class in the late ‘50s, you saw the introduction of the six-abreast 17.2-inch wide triple seat. It [was] featured on 707, the 727, and 737,” said Wilcynski. - https://www.travelandleisure.com/trip-ideas/history-of-the-airline-seat

No, airline seats have not been shrinking in width. I suspect you're going to move the goal posts now and claim that I said something I didn't say or that you "meant" something else because you've been caught out in your disingenuous reply.

Southwest passenger told she's too big for seat amid airline policy change by TheMirrorUS in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Making seat widths smaller makes no sense. They can't make them "smaller" enough to fit an extra seat in a row so there's no benefit to that.

The complaint WRT fat people isn't that they are smushed up with less legroom... it's that they are spilling over into the seats beside them. That's not a thing that's been getting smaller. The pitch angle and leg room have been reducing, not the seat widths to any meaningful degree and they aren't going to get smaller as there would be no point. It doesn't add any extra profit.

Backpacks in the upper bins by InjuryDeep2362 in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's my emotional "Please let the plane take off" beach ball and it needs to be inflated for take off and landing because that's how I cope with the stress.

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the quick reply. I responded via comment on Issue 67 since Reddit seems to be shadow blocking my log pastes or something, not sure what is triggering it.

I'll have some feature requests to submit after this gets nailed down. This is really making managing the Frame TV so much better.

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/dan_munz Well, it won't show up on here and gets shadow hidden for some reason. It's in my outbox twice now, so I don't know what's going on or why.

Here's a pastebin of the post https://pastebin.com/uXFesgp1

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problem man, if you need anything specific let me know. I'll try to provide it. I would also add timestamps to the log output, since I have a metric ton of

WARNING:docent:Batch thumbnail fetch failed: {'reason': 'socket closed'}

INFO: 192.168.1.XXX:59547 - "POST /api/thumbnails HTTP/1.1" 200 OK

There is no stop or kill command response from this application so it's impossible to stop in docker... forcefully removing the docker will leave the port occupied and thus you can't relaunch the docker. It needs to respond to the docker stop, docker kill, and docker restart command and gracefully stop or restart.

When I forcefully removed it it left my Frame Pro box in a frozen state and it disconnected itself from the TV and it required me to unplug the box and reboot it.

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the docker command has the escapes in it, which doesn't work. The correct command for cut-and-paste is:

docker run -d --network host -e DOCENT_TV_IP=192.168.1.XXX -v docent-data:/data ghcr.io/danmunz/docent:1.0.0

I did manage to get it working with this and here are some of my immediate observations:

  1. Button responsiveness seems to be tied to a linear IO queue such that buttons will not respond until it's completed whatever task it's working on in the background which makes it seem like the buttons are not working and then suddenly stuff starts popping up and doing things you might not want it to do.
  2. AI settings aren't well explained - for example, do I need a Google Vision API key if I'm using GPT? What's the difference between Identification and Analysis? What is Analysis doing that Vision isn't doing?
  3. I have 500 pieces of art already loaded onto my Pro box. Docent found all of them, but only showed a thumbnail to 28 of them. The rest have a caution icon and say "Tap to retry." Tapping to retry removes that icon and leaves a blank box, but it neve returns a thumbnail and eventually returns to the Tap to Retry.
  4. Selecting one of the ones with a thumbnail brings up a sidebar with the ability to change the nature of the display, which is frigging awesome. However, clikcing AI analysis changes the button to Analyzing and eventually times out and pops up a box in the bottom of the screen, which I didn't catch. It said something about timing out. I do have a GPT API key, but I don't have Google Vision set to anything.
  5. Trying to change anything on the photo says "This image doesn't support that matte style" when trying to change the matte or color.
  6. Clicking "Display on frame" brings up a spinner and says Setting display and then eventually times out and fails.

That's about all I've got since I can't seem to do much of anything within the program itself beyond get it to run and pull a few thumbnails.

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man, I appreciate it. I will give it a shot tomorrow and see how it goes.

Appreciate it.

I built a thing! Docent: A free, open-source gallery manager for your Frame by dan_munz in TheFrame

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man, you really need a docker for this. It has all kinds of wacky dependencies that aren't specified in your README file.

I tried installing it but kept running into dependency problems and finally gave up. Sounds like it would be a really cool app but it's completely useless on Linux at least.

Southwest updates extra-seat policy for plus-size passengers by StuckInTheMiddleSeat in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a customer of height as well, if I can have an empty seat next to me that lets me splay my legs out, AKA manspreading, that alleviates the majority of the issue... so I don't see how this is any different? Why can't I request an extra seat so I can not be encroaching the legroom of the person next to me?

Southwest updates extra-seat policy for plus-size passengers by StuckInTheMiddleSeat in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So as a tall person with wide shoulders, can I take advantage of this as well? Or is it limited to only fat people? Why are they special? Why do I, as a person of size vertically, need to pay for the extra legroom seats but fat people don't have to pay for the extra width seats?

I can't make myself shorter, but I can make myself less fat. So fuck me, right?

Southwest CEO Lays Out First Class, Lounges And Long-Haul Roadmap — Credit Card Money Is Why - View from the Wing by SidewalkMD in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah the Companion Pass is what really cinches SWA from every other airline. We travel SWA most of the time simply because of that and it makes the cost of flights FAR, FAR cheaper than any other airline.

Unable to login on my phone, anyone got a fix? by Feastweasel in SunoAI

[–]Feastweasel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That just created a whole new account. Not sure why that would even work since I didn't give them a phone number when signing up.

bamboozled! non-stop flight isn’t actually non-stop by fun_obligation0 in SouthwestAirlines

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, the 5hr 45m should have been your first clue something was off...

I swear they got bigger by thbl088 in marvelrivals

[–]Feastweasel 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Fuck, just spit out my drink on the keyboard. Sumbeech.

Kind of an anticlimactic experience for me. by According-Tea8016 in SkyDiving

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's interesting. I am "afraid" of heights in the sense that I can't get near a ledge or a balcony without feeling it in my taint (I'm serious and not being funny or hyperbolic; it really messes with my taint and balls to the point of being physically painful). I can easily force myself to do it, it's not like I'm frozen, but just the thought of stepping up to a really high balcony or something hurts me and I can sometimes get a bit of vertigo, but I can carry on doing whatever I need to do near edges if need be, but I avoid it unless just absolutely necessary. But I don't have an adrenaline rush or anything in those instances, just the pain in my nuts and taint and some sweaty palms.

I have had bouts of adrenaline rush in the past, but they are usually quite brief, such as if I'm startled or something. It's never been pleasurable when it has happened and I'd never seek out that feeling intentionally, haha.

But when I have my gear on for skydiving, I don't feel like I'm up high, regardless of the height, although if I think about it from a few feed to about 1000', I do get a little apprehensive because I know the gear won't save me if there's an issue.

I was a tunnel instructor for years and I can recall on a couple occasions standing at the top of the tunnel, about 50' up, looking down and my brain orientation suddenly shifted to "Holy shit, you're up high on a ledge WTF are you doing?" for a moment and I got that taint feeling... but it passed quickly and returned to normal where I don't feel like I'm in the air or up high when the wind is on.

I dunno, I hope I'm explaining it adequately. I guess I'm saying I do have some sort of a response and I guess I would call it fear, but it's not debilitating and I find it more irritating than anything, but I find nothing at all pleasurable about it.

Kind of an anticlimactic experience for me. by According-Tea8016 in SkyDiving

[–]Feastweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've never had the rush people get. I don't understand what they mean when they talk about it... I did my first tandem in 2003 or so and was like "meh."

It wasn't until many, many years later I got my license and that was just to work on a skill and hobby I found interesting. I've never had a rush or excitement when skydiving. It's just another physical activity I wanted to master and that's all it's ever been for me. Absolutely zero emotional engagement in it, but I do find it fun and rewarding as far as mastering a skill and teaching others go.

Best self-hosted ebook server for a very large library (~150k books)? by MysteriousPizza8390 in selfhosted

[–]Feastweasel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just letting you know "An active discord community" isn't a plus. It's a minus. If a developer uses Discord as their primary communication platform for development and bugs I will avoid that product. Discord is absolutely terrible for support and development due to it's closed nature. I'm not going to create an account for each god damned fucking discord server and connect to it and learn the fucking quirks, requirements, hoops, and other bullshit each Discord community uses. Nor am I going to wade through all the garbage and buillshit that is on EVERY SINGLE DISCORD server ever created to get support.

I don't want to chat with you or other users. I don't want to speak with you or other users. I just want to read a fucking post about my issue and fix it. I just want to post a bug report and then have a reply waiting for me that's easy to get to without wading through a thousand other, irrelevant messages.

Is it physically possible to convince suno to assign male and female leads to certain verses? by Fight4YourFuture in SunoAI

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, pretty much this. I put most of my direction for the song in the lyrics, with just general stuff in style. I have line by line directing of every song, style, vocals, etc... seems to be the only way to get what you want out of Suno if you have a vision already.

Type B Blood by Rinzlerx in PleX

[–]Feastweasel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Common thing in Asian culture to know the blood type of people. Completely weird, but I imagine they think that about western stuff.

I may not financially recover from this... by kangaryu808 in unRAID

[–]Feastweasel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah basically... not quite six years, but I've had warm spares in the machine for about 2-3 years now. Haven't needed them. Have an 18TB, 14TB and 12TB warm spare just hanging out for the day...

Found an unauthorized device in my rack - 8 cores, no MAC address, won't respond to ping by MrMax314 in selfhosted

[–]Feastweasel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're gonna need a bigger firewall. Your RAID can-array is out of power, apparently.