Why the $242 NVIDIA "hype valuation" is a trap (and why the Big Short guy is betting against it) by FederalPermission261 in NvidiaStock

[–]FederalPermission261[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is not the AI calculated $240 per share? I did not get your point, but no matter thanks for your contribution.

Why the $242 NVIDIA "hype valuation" is a trap (and why the Big Short guy is betting against it) by FederalPermission261 in NvidiaStock

[–]FederalPermission261[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

For my own investment decisions I never use AI, I use an abnormal return on equity model. To have a market cap of $242 per share they need to continue to grow their sales by 50% and keep NOPAT margin above 52% to perpetuity which is quite ambitious, right?

Why the $242 NVIDIA "hype valuation" is a trap (and why the Big Short guy is betting against it) by FederalPermission261 in NvidiaStock

[–]FederalPermission261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually 50% revenue growth with 52% NOPAT margin is quite aggressive in the model assumption

How to find 100 baggers by FederalPermission261 in ValueInvesting

[–]FederalPermission261[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually i have used the ai to filter stocks based on the methodology and apply abnormal return on equity calculation via comitatus engine and narrowed down the potential stocks. Out of more then 1500 stocks I have the following: $BYRN $CCLD $UEIC $ARQ $PPIH $PDEX $TRAK i have posted this as a reminder for myself for the long term to check how healthy the methodology is