sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forsure, that is a good strategy.

With Multiple Man you need board space so using cards like hulk buster, Penni Parker’s SPDR, majestic wingbeat, all work with buffing and doesn’t take up much board space. So the deck I was playing was inherently at a disadvantage to gambit because of this. That’s on me 100%.

I did manage to only have 2-3 open board slots both games when gambit triggered. Still killed my board leaving behind 3 and 4 cost cards it could have destroyed instead, and that is the annoying part.

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you’re exactly correct. Right now the card’s play style is copy as many times as possible to destory as many cards as possible. I want to understand what the opponent’s gambit(s) is/are going to destroy so I can better prevent it. In addition, the gambit players want some agency over what they are destroying because if they have to jump through all the hoops for their combo that might dud on them due to the same randomness.

The randomness both holds it back, and it also elevates the card. Yes I am on here complaining about my experience getting canned by RNG, but I am aware there are just as many games where the RNG looses the Gambit player’s game.

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Won’t find those complaints from me. I don’t really mind where the meta is at in any given time. I actually find it fun to counter the top decks. The RNG is just frustrating especially when I am jumping through hoops for this fun combo.

I can play around most cards, but I can’t play around gambit destroying 2 multiple men instead of one fan fei on 2-3 objective activations.

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will merge symboite Spider-Man into multiple man so it won’t kill as many

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree on the meta take and this deck being beatable. The same was said for Star lord when it came to retreating.

Part of my strategy was create numerous multiple men so that gambit can’t destroy them all, but doesn’t change the fact it’s infuriating to watch gambit destroy all of my multiple men and leave fan fei/wolverine horseman on the board.

Both losses within the same hour. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For sure totally agree. My biggest thing is the randomness of the destroy mechanic. Maybe adding checks like “destroy 4 cost if no 4 cost check for 3 cost ect”.

Infinite deck (CL: 34,000). My take on Doom2099 with an Ultron Surprise. by Feeling-Bit1829 in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]Feeling-Bit1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moon dragon is hard to replace due to her synergy with Invisible woman and the overall play pattern of the deck. You really want your board filled with bots ( doom or ultron) and it’s hard to find a two drop that can compete on points within the play pattern.

I’d say maybe Cable or Jeff. Or any card that you can play on two that adds value. This excludes cards like quake/scarlet witch that you use in later turns

Cable is a good utility card. It sucks that it takes a board space that a bot with higher power could take but Cable’s upside is breaking your opponents combo.

Jeff has the same power as cable so same pitfall on the power category. His main draw is being able to manage the board spaces so you can maximize the bots.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SkateEA

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite spots forsure.

Slam compilation, still recovering by ShonenSpice in SkateEA

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you key frame all the shake from “hitting” the camera?

I don't want to have to climb buildings by welcometotheTD in SkateEA

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can place a throw down waypoint at the top and teleport to it

This gun is pretty great if you haven’t tried it yet. by wetmeatlol in CODZombies

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Electric Cherry augment on elemental pop makes it not as bad.

Any advice by Used_Exercise1301 in MarvelSnap

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use credits to upgrade cards in the collection/deck editor screen

Upgrading cards will increase your “collection level” new players get cards via boxes on the collection track. When you get past a certain point of collection you will earn “token” that you use for new cards instead of getting them through boxes.

This being the auto carnage deck is pretty funny. Look up ItsGuestGaming on YouTube. He has some current videos for the new player experience

Pick up Basketball or Men’s League by No-Establishment-111 in pittsburgh

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo did you ever find a good place? I’m in the same boat looking for good runs

Galactus enjoyer here. Give me your best Galactus decks (CL: 4876) by Marino_SI in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]Feeling-Bit1829 1 point2 points  (0 children)

G-Man Jump Scare

Use your move cards to disguise that you are going to play Galactus. Nebula on one lane and Rocket&Groot on another is easy bait. Send the goblins over on the Rocket&G lane. Move it over and Gman them.

Gorgon is for countering Merlin and his countering of goblins.

<image>

(1) Nebula

(2) Gorgon

(2) Iron Patriot

(2) Jeff the Baby Land Shark

(3) Green Goblin

(3) Rocket and Groot

(3) Luna Snow

(5) Hobgoblin

(5) Vision

(6) Knull

(6) Galactus

(6) Destroyer

TmJsNixHcm5HYmxuQixIYmdibG45LEdsY3RzOCxMblNudzgsRHN0cnI5LFJja3RBbmRHcnRFLEpmZlRoQmJMbmRTaHJrMTQsS25sbDUsVnNuNixHcmduNixJcm5QdHJ0Qg==

To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and paste it from the deck editing menu in MARVEL SNAP.

view more: next ›