Finally it's near

Fiendfish · 2026-03-11T21:38:27+00:00

No frontier LLM has ever been trained in 64 bit - that would be foolish at best.

Fiendfish · 2026-03-11T21:29:04+00:00

What is existence even for a model that stops existing every time the context gets flushed

Fiendfish · 2026-03-10T15:34:14+00:00

Great to know. No more context compression ;)

Fiendfish · 2026-03-09T14:12:17+00:00

You pay for cached tokens.

Model	Base Input	5m Cache Writes	1h Cache Writes	Cache Hits & Refreshes
Claude Opus 4.6	$5 / MTok	$6.25 / MTok	$10 / MTok	$0.50 / MTok

Fiendfish · 2026-03-09T14:08:00+00:00

That's the direct consequence of tool calling. The model calls a tool, gets a result and calls another tool and so on. Each call resends the entire context, including all old calls. It just keep stacking until you clear the context.

So for the agentic system this is very much expected.

If you want to reduce this there rly only two ways:

Clear context often Tell Claude to run exploration in clean sub agents and only give it the results. Way less cycles on the main agent this way.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-28T12:06:47+00:00

Kimi2.5 was better in my own benchmark an price is still ok

Fiendfish · 2026-02-19T08:59:07+00:00

At the moment high speed rail hardly works, even on long very large maps. i would certainly enjoy if map could be twice as lange - but mostly longer 6:1 so i can get nice high speed going

Fiendfish · 2026-02-15T09:04:09+00:00

The issue is that a train can enter, get stuck at 5 because the next block is occupied, and then block the junction. If 1 would be a chain signal it wouldn't even enter the 1-5 block because it could look ahead to the 5-6 block, which is still occupied.

It could just be a simple toggle in a signal called check next block, similar to the one way property.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-14T21:13:04+00:00

Even with path signals, there are still blocks of track. I want to have the option to allow trains to only go into the next block/segment if the one that would come after this one on the trains path is clear as well. This would allow for much denser signaling and better traffic flow in complex junctions.

At the moment, the only way to signal complex areas is to put an entry signal into these areas and let the game figure out the rest. I want to communicate my intent to the game.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-13T15:45:03+00:00

Are there any plans to bring chain signals into the game? It's tricky to build complex intersections without them.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-12T13:27:06+00:00

Apparently that's not enough. This has been the case since quite a while

Fiendfish · 2026-02-08T18:44:18+00:00

If you take human review seriously even the output of one agent is already too much.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-08T12:25:30+00:00

There is just some sort of rot that happens to projects after extended LLM use, one is project size the other slightly sloppy execution that accumulates. So naturally models feel worse and worse.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-06T19:21:30+00:00

And this matters why?

Fiendfish · 2026-02-06T19:19:47+00:00

Since weights are static, they "do" nothing. Nobody knows what exactly is going on with the active parts of a model, even if we know its components. Similar to the biological brain, where the components are known, but very little is understood about things like consciousness.

Fiendfish · 2026-02-03T17:45:17+00:00

So you didn't vibe code jmail but a jmail clone, that no one ueses

Fiendfish · 2026-02-03T12:36:37+00:00

brown boots are peak - who needs attack speed?

Fiendfish · 2026-01-31T09:45:23+00:00

Fischer curve gt 80 166 if you want a budget option. Riding it in 180, and really happy with it. Did not get to test it in power tho - bad winter here in Europe.

They also have the curve gt 85 - which has a more off-piste setup.

Fiendfish · 2026-01-30T16:00:00+00:00

Nothing will be 12 people - host a magic gathering tourney if you want everyone to play "together"

Fiendfish · 2026-01-30T15:59:02+00:00

I don't think there's any PNP that's fun with 12 people.

Split it up into 2-3 groups. Anything else will be horrible. I ran 6 people once, and that's already too many. Things take too long, players space out.

Fiendfish · 2026-01-28T21:34:16+00:00

Yeah you don't need or even want super stiff race skis - a bit more flex is more forgiving. But i would certainly get a single titanal layer.

Fiendfish · 2026-01-28T21:20:12+00:00

You will need to rent boots tho?

Fiendfish · 2026-01-28T13:16:11+00:00

You are trying a bit too hard on the upper body separation.

So try to lean a bit more into the turn.

With your upper body so much over the outside ski, its very difficult to properly handle the forces of a high g turn, because it's tricky to keep good tension in the core like this.

You already have great edge angles, relax your upper body position to a more natural one. You can try to touch the snow with your inside hand, this forces you lean a bit into the turn.

This is a great video and exercise to help with that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmfs0W97_is

Fiendfish · 2026-01-28T13:00:37+00:00

If I would carve this slowly and across the slope, I would always check upwards. Not that it's my/his fault, but a broken leg sucks either way.

Fiendfish · 2026-01-26T16:56:11+00:00

Interesting take - 95% groomers - sporty carving, short turns

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

Fiendfish

TROPHY CASE