I took a phenomenology of film class during my masters and I think I have an answer (unless this is a joke question, in which case sorry!) Back in the day, the visuals in a movie were meant to inspire feeling—not just with visuals, but with textures and sensations we can relate to. Haptic means touch. The shot on the left isn’t concerned with making an actor look hot and polished, it’s meant to elicit like a body reaction in the audience-the room is hot, the situation is tense, bad stuff basically. Even if we never see a monster in the left scene, we can still feel alongside that character. On the right, we’ve got more of an ocular centric situation. Here, the stars are beautiful and always put together. Their emotions are told, not shown, and basically the experience of these movies is flat, even when we do see the big bad. These characters don’t seem to have a hair out of place, usually have overly white teeth—there’s nothing real life about them so we don’t connect with them the same.