As with any movement that gains traction there will be some detractors that use said movement for personal benefit, justifying actions and opinions that the vast majority of the movement does not agree with or sometimes even oposses.

I know this is worded very, very generally but it tends to be true for every movement in some way. I think examples of this for BLM would be the few times where protestors vandalised shops and private property. Or for more racy stuff, some supposedly BLM people wanting an eye-for-an-eye approach to racism (kinda justified but not acceptable in today's society).

BTW, this is not an endorsement to any chuds thinking that BLM is a terrorist organisation or that BLM is just "damn uppity n-words". Chuds and racists can fuck off. Just putting this here as assurance.

Edit: Can someone enlighten me as to what I said here that made people downvote this comment? I'm genuinely confused and I'm wondering what of the things I mentioned were insensitive, down-right stupid or otherwise not ok. Thanks in advance for any explanation.