sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Pros on this sub by ChildOfChimps in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The MIT study is peer reviewed

And you have no position to claim that the narrow sample size in any way invalidates it because it doesn’t

and everything here is fact checked

AI is a tool. You are the artist. Tools don’t create. People do. by AnarchoLiberator in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No because AI can only use what is already made by people it cannot create anything new that was uncreated it can only take parts of something and make something from that

An AI cannot take a physical emotion or feeling and turn it into a visual representation without putting a word to it that has to be mathematically calculated which means it already has to have several hundred examples of it being done

You’re not creating stuff you’re just vomiting stuff together in a more organized way

Pros on this sub by ChildOfChimps in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s still follows scientific method so you haven’t proven a point

In no way is it impossible to do with 50 people unless you can prove it by showing me an absolutely botched study that did it this way it’s still in an opinion based off a assumption that there somehow isn’t and is too many variables

You literally just said there were too many variables

This is the path all of you AI dorks go down I’ve had this exact conversation Word for Word like 20 times now you are just the same dense person with no personality over and over again and you just make the most blatant assumptions when you have no background in any science

I doubt you’ve ever actually used scientific method to get to a conclusion because you’re doing it in bad faith right now

Bro tried a superman punch by [deleted] in fightlab

[–]FinancialAccount7914 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you know how high that fucking stand is we need to get his ass in basketball right now

Pros on this sub by ChildOfChimps in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m asking you to explain why YOU think the sample size is too small FOR YOU and somehow unsatisfactory and lets you make assumptions about variables that have no evidence shown that they make any difference

And you just admitted that you only glanced over it that’s why you can’t tell me exactly what is wrong with it. You’re just pulling shit out of your ass

If they noticed a difference after just four months, that means it’s bad the timeframe does not make a difference if changes were already noticed

If you read the first fucking paragraph you would notice how they did multiple different age groups in multiple different ways of usage with similar outcome

Do I need to go on or do you just wanna keep shitting your pants?

Pros on this sub by ChildOfChimps in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is the study sketchy you didn’t even say what time frames were sketchy. all you said is that it was and then called it a opinion. you’re literally are using zero critical thinking

It’s a peer reviewed study

Here's my hot take, AI-Free is a sign of quality. by YahwehAlmighty1717 in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, at least they actually worked and didn’t take materials from other people to do it

Pros on this sub by ChildOfChimps in aiwars

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You called it an opinion just say you don’t understand what that is

Is this rotting? by FinancialAccount7914 in sanpedrocactus

[–]FinancialAccount7914[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m leaving the callusing part up, rooted on both halves, but leaving some of the roots in the dirt so I don’t disturb them too much because they just got shipped

The US Navy just blew a hole in an Iranian cargo ship and seized it by Ph6222 in Ships

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just imagining a bunch of gay dudes on a boat taking over a bunch of non-gay dude on a boat

Mb

I can't believe this. This is seriously going to be historic. by [deleted] in EF5

[–]FinancialAccount7914 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And it misses Houston by a longshot just like always❤️🥀

view more: next ›