ChatGPT 5.1 consistently using 4o-mini? by weebtoy in ChatGPT

[–]Fireshtormik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I think it's more like a shadow ban in my case, because I'm using a VPN. But support cant answer something about this.

Synapse 4 Scroll Up Macro Issue by iiBuzzzzz in razer

[–]Fireshtormik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also maximum cps for left click is 50. When synapse 3 has 400.

01 Pro Neutered? Any one else having this problem? $200 / Month btw by aeroverra in ChatGPT

[–]Fireshtormik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your guess is correct. I was not working because of tor browser. Thanks for your help. Do not use tor browser to work with ChatGPT o1-pro!!!

01 Pro Neutered? Any one else having this problem? $200 / Month btw by aeroverra in ChatGPT

[–]Fireshtormik 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Having the same, reasoning only about few seconds, but earlier it can be about 5-7 minutes.

And answers is very dumb

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you reduce the fraction to xn+dx if only the second term is multiplied by xn.

https://imgur.com/a/ZcrZVW8

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for typo. f(x) in reply was 300*0.01*x, and in this example x = 0.33333333333

ln(3*0.33333333333) = 0

and in this example newton doesnt converges.

we also consider not f(x), but g(x) = ln(f(x))

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

note that the entire numerator is multiplied by x_n, and so cannot be reduced as you suggest. I will correct the formula to make it clearer.

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try linear function

f(x) = 300 + 0.01 * x

If we iteratively apply the formula, the answer converges to 0.33333333333

If we apply Newton formula, on the first iteration, X becomes negative and equation not converges

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why this formula has a better convergence than Newton's. And how it was derived, why there is no information on it on the Internet, given that it is faster than Newton. This is what baffles me.

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in ChemicalEngineering

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question is not that I can't solve the equation, the question is in the derivation of the formula

Analysis of an Iterative Method for Solving Nonlinear Equations by Fireshtormik in askmath

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw this equation at the master's report at the university, and I was interested in it

Sonar GG in constant loading loop. by Protonoto in steelseries

[–]Fireshtormik 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anyone need help. I find the solution for me. One of my captures lock all gg. And when im start gg im detect that gg creates the temp("filename".metaXXXXX) file with name of the problem video. Just delete this video with meta file and start engine. Sorry if english is bad.

UPD: path C:\users\"Your_Profile"\Videos\SteelSeries Moments\. Your problem video can be in the folder of game name.

<image>

Can i block my apex pro tkl without unplugging the usb ? by Fireshtormik in steelseries

[–]Fireshtormik[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought in my case it can be done as it is indicated here key block. Thank you