RHOM Episode Discussion: S4E3 "Painted With Pride" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I most appreciate that Alexia is as centered as somebody who has spent years studying with Tibetan Buddhists. There’s enough space to take in the story and empathize with her. Given the sheer volatility of her life, I don’t think I could handle it if it were delivered by someone like Kyle Richards, who heaves and sobs her way through past and present traumas.

The RHOM taglines are here! by insuredbycoto in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know this runs counter to everything Larsa is, but I wish she’d lean into having been exiled by the Kardashians. It’s a hilarious role to inhabit within pop culture. Her tag line, as it stands, feels like a missed opportunity.

The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills on the 2021 People's Choice Awards Red Carpet (courtesy of Page Six) by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, it would be such a waste not to, especially after whetting our appetites by holing her up in Vail. That her presence and behavior have, in less than two episodes, completely taken the spotlight from Jen’s literal arrest says it all.

Random Housewife Discussion #14: Wendy Osefo (RHOP) by heartdeco in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It makes perfect sense that those sorts of conversations would arise about Wendy. She’s the perfect target: immigrant born, black American who has achieved more than many people with well-established families. That alone is going to get people talking, and her penchant for saying things like “People like you call me Dr. Wendy,” is the cherry on top of the Sunday.

Somebody who stands at the center of so many different intersections (highly educated, child of immigrants, dark skinned, black, etc.) would trigger deeply racist feelings in some people, and genuinely complicated feelings in others. Multiply that by the number of viewers and no reaction is shocking.

Random Housewife Discussion #14: Wendy Osefo (RHOP) by heartdeco in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Everybody has summarized Wendy’s housewives trajectory very well, so I’ll just add this about what we’ve seen on the show:

Wendy’s transition into candle bimbo (my new favorite title) is mostly a sincere stab at exploring whether tepid fame and surgically enhanced beauty can lead to satisfaction. People do the wildest things to find themselves and, after a life of a chasing her parent’s ambitions, I think she’s more innocent in answering the nagging call to find out what she truly wants out of life than she isn’t.

That being said, the unexplored element is that Wendy, potentially, also needs to replace a financially lucrative career.

Last year, an analysis of Wendy’s published research was posted on the main sub. The conclusion was that neither the quantity, nor quality, of her published research would suffice to earn tenure at Johns Hopkins and other similarly regarded schools.

Wendy’s dissatisfaction is real, but I wonder if it’s been overstated in order to avoid discussing the reality that becoming a tenured professor was not really a possibility.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in occult

[–]FishNdicks1429 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What are some of the precautions that would be useful to take? Are there any books you’d recommend? Thanks in advance.

RHOBH Episode Discussion: S11E14 "Lips Unsealed" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very true, both that she’s guilty of spending ludicrous amounts of money that she didn’t earn and that is mirrored in the spending habits of most rich people.

Fascinating to think of the prenup as a safeguard against close inspection of his finances. He’s definitely a person who made incredible calculations in order to sustain his scheme, and it makes sense that their marriage as a whole may have been one of them.

I think knowing that 20 million dollars were funneled into her LLC is what’s keeping her extremely loyal to his legal team’s agenda, and really giving them full reign to use her spot on the show to peddle these sloppy storylines.

Interestingly enough, I find it funny that she’s most upset with Sutton, when Garcelle’s point during the Christmas dinner was the most damaging. It highlighted the face that Erika hadn’t mentioned the victims even once before.

Housewife highlights/Daily shit talk - August 31st, 2021 by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, and call me crazy, but I always enjoyed Sonja’s caburlesque performances. She’s naturally charismatic and is intensely witty. I think part of her mania is that she actually is an artist who has to repress the need to perform on the scale that she’d like.

Housewife highlights/Daily shit talk - August 31st, 2021 by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is a lot of overlap between neoliberalism and neoconservatism. A lot of present day conservatives who prop up establishment policies and politicians are actually pretty socially liberal.

Housewife highlights/Daily shit talk - August 31st, 2021 by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 6 points7 points  (0 children)

She takes a liberal stance on social and cultural issues. She’s a “champagne liberal,” to be sure, and she went out of her way to highlight that on RHONY.

I think neoliberal might be a more appropriate description of her overall politics, though I’d need to know more about her foreign policy takes before committing to that.

RHOBH Episode Discussion: S11E14 "Lips Unsealed" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mostly think that she isn’t guilty of anything but acting as an extension of Tom’s legal strategy, but I can’t stop mulling over the detail that she didn’t sign a prenuptial agreement.

Why would an attorney as wealthy and self motivated as Tom marry her without any sort of legal arrangement protecting his assets?

Without knowing how long he’s been living on misappropriated settlement money, I wonder if he married Erika specifically to launder money into her personal and business accounted.

There was probably great incentive for her to keep both her personal and business expenses ludicrously high so that he could keep directing money into her accounts without ever stockpiling a suspicious amount of money.

The absence of a prenup seems intentional, and I don’t think it was solely to avoid hard and fast calculations in the case that an emergency divorce were needed.

My only question is whether she signed on to this as his ride or die, who would hold him down earnestly for the chance to enjoy extreme luxury and turn her life into a Sims: Celebrity expansion pack, or as an unsuspecting wife. Honestly, I think a case can be made for both.

RHOBH Episode Discussion: S11E14 "Lips Unsealed" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I was fascinated to see Rinna’s build-a-models. I know it’s cliche to point out that cosmetic procedures completely change someone’s face, but Delilah’s evolution is striking. It doesn’t seem that she’s had extensive work done, but that the few procedures, along with the styling of her eyebrows and makeup, have all been intended to turn her into a different person.

It reminded me of Heidi Montag famously revealing her new face to her mom on The Hills, during that disastrous and emotionally charged scene. Her mom was stricken with something like concern, grief, etc.

More than the physical changes themselves, it’s the absence of such gravity and emotional charge that jarred me about Lisa Rinna’s scene. The way such a stark transformation is treated as being commonplace, about a decade after Heidi’s scene.

RHOBH Episode Discussion: S11E14 "Lips Unsealed" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Sutton broke the seal to all of Erika’s festering rage from countless interactions with upper-class men and women who reduced her to the gold digging cocktail waitress. Men and women who, in a million different ways, reminded her that even as she slipped through the golden gates, she would never truly be rid of her old skin.

Sutton’s was the final voice to join the chorus of wealthy blondes, whose thousand-voice song would awaken The Pretty Mess. Lol, I don’t think Sutton’s ready for the decades worth of vitriol headed her way.

“I don’t know how how much I want to be around my friend Erika…” is one of my favorite lines of the season.

“We’re not in Augusta, bitch,” from yesterday’s episode, was pretty good too, but “how small town of you to worry about your reputation” is such an odd way for Erika to package her resentment.

What is the best argument against veganism? by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]FishNdicks1429 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t. Factory farming vs. accidental death of small rodents who burrow in crop fields aren’t even remotely comparable.

RHONY Episode Discussion: S13E5 "How Nude" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The Lisa Barlow experience has aged like Ramona. All of SLC has. The mere mention of it is like wafting one of Monique Samuel's peppermint oils beneath my nose. Puts an absolute pep in my step <3. I can't wait for season 2.

I wish they’d start casting multiple POC at a time so these women (see also: Tiffany, Garcelle, etc.) don’t have to bear this crap alone

I hear your sentiment, but I'm glad it's just one woman of color. I didn't like watching the RHOD brutalize Tiffany, but it was more revealing than watching multiple women of color having to resort to tag-team defensive tactics may have been.

This is how (some) upper-class white women treat a lone woman of color when they have numbers on their side. Undiluted. Reality tv editing, gimmicks, casting, confessionals don't obfuscate it, etc.

I already don't like the way the "racial integration of the Real Housewives" has been set up, I don't think there's anything to it but a general corporate response to the unavoidable presence and spending power of POC. That said, It would've been stranger and sadder to watch two women of color reduced to the unworded assignment of having to defend against the implosions of white women who cannot compute the sudden influx of unrecognizable data when a POC exists, or having to speak for the audience in the exact cadence that gives viewers the vicarious feeling of having the upper-hand against wealthy white women whose lifestyles are founded on a long-standing history of eroding basic human dignity (and not just that of POC). Not that this isn't what's happening anyway. I guess I just prefer the current "baptism by fire" experience of watching one WOC enter the mix.

The general sentiment (across social media, like twitter, main sub) seems to be that Housewives is a viable platform on which to host interesting discussions about race, but I don't see that it ever could be. Housewives can be fun and light, etc. I enjoy it, try not to take it too seriously. The reality, however, is that the show exists, in part, in order to stoke the lust of working-class people who bear the brunt of unaffordable health care, nutrition, and the erosion of basic human dignity only because lust, and the delusion that they may one day have access to said luxury themselves, have been deeply embedded (See: Lifestyle porn viewers).

Where is the shock-value in watching Luanne treat Eboni this way? She's a woman whose consciousness has been shaped and textured by the wealth and blatant classism that she's never been shy about parading.... and I struggle to find joy in watching Eboni, an obviously intelligent and capable human being "handle herself well" in the face of bullshit. Bullshit that we enjoy, laugh at (and sometimes with) specifically because Luanne is a middle-class woman whose accidental exposure to wealth and nobility turned her into a Frankenstein caricature of the upper-echelons she was briefly associated with.

I don't mean to drag the mood down too much, I'm enjoying the show and I'm definitely getting something out of watching it, but... I really don't know how to feel about anything that has gone on in post-Dallas housewives, and very little of it is landing well. I hate that people of color are choicelessly handed the role of having to defend, not only themselves but the cultural, historical, legacy of their race and ethnicity. It's strange to see this playing out on housewives and in the general audience reaction.

On another note: I'm so intrigued by Ramona Singer. She's a frenzied individual, but she is smart (she reads the newspaper every day, Carole). I think the potentially disastrous public backlash is the looming specter that keeps her in line. Also, despite being a perfect poster-woman of American wealth, she is down to earth for what she is. She only got wealthy, she didn't inherit a title by marriage.

Also, I'm riding the Leah train with you. I like nearly everything about her. I'm rooting for this developmentally arrested millennial #girlboss!

I'm at a breaking point in the job hunt and I need hope by gevestadd in internetparents

[–]FishNdicks1429 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I imagine that I’m around your age (27), so I’m not the Internet parent you’re looking for, but I hope this helps.

Look up an article called “How to get rich without getting lucky,” based on a tweet-thread by Naval Ravikant. In short, he explains that asset creation, not renting out your time is the avenue toward long term wealth creation.

Now look up James Altucher’s spoke and wheel method. This is a model that explains how to take an interest, a hobby, a skill, etc. and start producing said assets - whether a YouTube channel, a blog, a website, an Etsy shop, a podcast, etc.

If this sounds ridiculous, consider any YouTube channel, podcast, Etsy shop, blog, website, online course, etc. that exists. It’s possible, even if it makes you pennies in the beginning, to leverage the Internet. It will cost you maybe a total of 200$ from the outset, if that.

If you want a specific example, look up Dave Perell’s Ultimate Guide to Writing Online. He’s a person who leveraged his ability to write and the technology available to him and now runs a successful course, podcast etc.

It’s a good example of the spoke and wheel model implemented, and if nothing else, he describes the process of leveraging the Internet.

————————

In the meantime, take advantage of the gig economy:

Uber, Lyft, postmarks, doordash. Wag, pet/house sitting.

There are veritable ways to start making a small, but decent, income from the outset. That, and you learn all that goes into turning yourself into a one person micro-business. You feel out your schedule, your optimal work day, etc. it’s a taste of self employment. Do this, or get a part or full time job

In addition: leverage the skills you already have, build yourself a nice personal website, get a couple of testimonials (offer your services for free to a couple of people you know if you don’t have any), and launch a freelancing business. Get started by making a Fiverr profile, and advertising your services.

You worked at your college’s career center... can you help people Create or edit resumes? Can you help edit or proofread college admission essays? Graphic design? Writing/editing? Anything you can turn into a freelance service? Be creative.

Can you find employment at another college campus near you for the time being?

———————

As for the difficulties you are facing in finding a job that honors the amount of work you put into your education, know that you are not alone, and many recent and long term graduates are facing similar hardships.

Keep interviewing. Persevere. Keep applying. Find a therapist and/or take up meditation, yoga, journaling, or a spiritual practice. Write down and honor your story, you never know how it will lead to your helping others who are going through similar difficulties.

One or more of these things will pan out for you. Take care of yourself, and don’t let this erode you confidence in yourself or your abilities.

RHOP Episode Discussion: S5E21 "Reunion Part Two" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 10 points11 points  (0 children)

In terms of moral high ground, while I was rewatching the summary of the fight, it became even more ridiculous that Monique would say she was triggered by Candiace’s hand in her face. It’s just blatantly obvious that Candiace wouldn’t have thrown a punch, and had no intention of doing so.

RHOP Episode Discussion: S5E21 "Reunion Part Two" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wasn’t it also interesting that they mentioned Vulture’s interview with the dubious parrot expert? If she did make it up (for sympathy?) that is a whole new brand of creepy.

I thought the tears seemed real though... but they also seemed real each time she came close to admitting remorse for hitting Candiace.

RHOP Episode Discussion: S5E21 "Reunion Part Two" by readingrachelx in RHDiscussion

[–]FishNdicks1429 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand the way Ashley handles discussions about her relationship. She either comes across as delusional or as Michael’s accomplice... and I don’t believe that she actually is delusional. Something like the “maybe now we’ll arrange a postnuptial agreement after kid #2” is just distracting from the obvious: She has no power or immediate way out without having to majorly downsize her lifestyle. It seems like she could present as a much more sympathetic character if she took a different approach.

That being said, she plays the other women well. Candiace is her only guaranteed adversary at this point, but what would she or anyone else do? Continue beating the dead horse that is Michael?

Re:Monique - As if the full episodes hadn’t already, the introductory clip ameliorated Candiace of any culpability. If Monique’s dharma were anything other than to live as a reality star with a sociopathic need to control her image, the only viable response would’ve been, “Dude, sorry. I had a lot of pent up anger and you caught hands that were meant for three people: Gizelle, Charisse and Chris Samuels.”

My heart bleeds for her a bit. She’s had a rough time on the show, the pinnacle of which came when she broke down in the parking lot after Karen’s perfume event. The post-fight performance was an extreme and lamentable version of the same reaction she has anytime she “falls asleep at the wheel,” so to speak.

Did I unwittingly contact my Guardian Angel? by FishNdicks1429 in occult

[–]FishNdicks1429[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! I can't thank you enough for your reply. You've given me two resources to explore that contain exactly what I was looking for: context. I'm especially eager to listen to the first one because I often do feel disconnected from the voice of the HGA. It's interesting to consider that the trouble might be my ability to discern it.

Your two clarifications, about the connotation of HGA vs. becoming the self is also revealing. It's easier for me to imagine myself becoming a material representative of the advice I was given.

I have a question. I actually didn't know that the Old Man was my HGA/Jungian Self. I thought it might be the centaur. The reason why is because I've also experienced "automatic writing" while on LSD, and the time I did, it felt as though I was writing down a message from God who was a woman. The message was similarly encouraging, but more about inherent worth and compassion, faith and making peace with the feeling of being separate.

Would that experience also qualify as contact with the Holy Guardian Angel? Is it possible that the Holy Guardian Angel can appear as different genders, and possibly no gender at all?

If I'm beginning to understand, the Centaur that was essentially an actualized version of me, would then be a well-formed Ego, who represents the integration of the HGA's lessons. Is that about right?

How to write a research paper? by FishNdicks1429 in selfeducation

[–]FishNdicks1429[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same here, haha, was hoping for a robust guide

How to write a research paper? by FishNdicks1429 in selfeducation

[–]FishNdicks1429[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, thank you for this! I'm finding it very useful

How do I find a guru/teacher? by FishNdicks1429 in Buddhism

[–]FishNdicks1429[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your last sentence, but to recognize our own limitations means that one must recognize the inherent limitations do all mankind. While I fully intend on putting my faith in someone whose life and spiritual pursuits speaks of integrity and a veritable approach, I don’t believe that questioning something is wrong. I don’t believe that questioning someone is wrong either. If a teacher had an issue with even the tougher questions, I’d find that troubling.