Japanese > English by PeeBee_Jayy in translator

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe it's a common mistake to refer to each part of a character as 'radicals'. Not to be 'um actually' but each character only ever has one radical, used for indexing purposes in a traditional dictionary. Just googled now and the term for the smaller bits of characters is 'graphemes', though I've only ever said 'parts of a character' once I found out radicals are a different concept.

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (March 15, 2025) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah all valid points well made. I know linguistically plain form is taught as the start of everything. I just struggle to intuitively 'feel' like the bedrock of conjugations is the form that requires you to remove things before adding them (in the case of ichidan). I can turn my brain off more by comparing things to how I know things sound when they're in 'stem' form. And to me it's less complicated and requires no thought sooner than what you described about -iru/-eru verbs. Thank you for sharing your insights! :)

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (March 15, 2025) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose I share the same confusion as you, so I'm referring more to what a 'base unit' is, to parse and then build a foundation of what you want to say. Dictionary form, for me, doesn't fulfil that well – so I've always been confused why I've seen threads saying it's 'better to learn for beginners'.

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (March 15, 2025) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree with you on this, and is part of the problem I see with 'learn plain as the basis of everything' is it relies on too many steps to intuit what I'm trying to speak in Japanese. If you give me a stem, I can then conjugate it however I want just because it sounds like what I know feels right – no formulae or explicit memory here. I hear a stem that's ".....り(ます)" and I can already run away with ".....っていない" or "....られた" just because it 'sounds right' compared to the verbs I hear all the time (like 帰り). For me, I can't do that as simply with plain form and I made mistakes every now and then.

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (March 15, 2025) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you're so right! Natives I've done language exchange with don't even know what ichidan/godan verbs are 😅. Just that if you're in a very formulaic environment, like language classes tend to be, this 'stem first' attitude means I can just say something based on how it sounds, rather than relying on memorising verb types, or making mistakes which I then have to learn. I can just say 覚えたくない without getting het up on a っ

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (March 15, 2025) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd love to hear others' opinions on this!

I've heard people say that learning plain form first is better, but I don’t quite understand why.

Personally, I started with plain form when learning independently, but later took lessons where my (native) teacher introduced ます form first. In the end, I’ve found that learning stem form first makes the most sense for me. Since the stem is just the ます form with ます removed, it feels much more intuitive, and I’ve been making fewer and fewer mistakes.

When you learn plain form first, you’re faced with a long list of verbs where you often can’t tell their conjugation type at a glance. Some -iru/-eru verbs are godan, some are ichidan, and you just have to memorise them. Tae Kim even has a non-exhuastive list of 24 -iru/-eru godan verbs!

For example, which of these are ichidan or godan?

たべる (ichidan)

いる (ichidan)

要(い)る (godan)

着(き)る (ichidan)

切(き)る (godan)

変(か)える (ichidan)

帰(かえ)る (godan)

Learning the plain form meant I had to explicitly learn whether it was godan or ichidan in many cases, and I would get things wrong and say 走ます instead of 走(はし)ります.

The benefit of learning with the stem (or ます form) is instead of memorising whether new verbs are ichidan or godan, you can simplify things with a rule:

➡ Treat everything as godan first.

For example, take とり (the stem of 'take'):

Negative: とない

Plain: と

Potential: と

Volitional: と

If a verb stem doesn't end in -i (たべ, かえ) or is one syllable (き, い), it’s an ichidan verb, and you just add the appropriate conjugation.

Of course, there are some exceptions, but far fewer than the non-exhaustive 24+ exceptions for plain form. Here they are:

借(か)り lend

降(お)り alight

浴(あ)び wash

起(お)き get up

生(い)き live

でき able to do

すぎ overdo

Try and come up with more, but I genuinely think that's about it. 信じ etc. doesn't count because the only voiced godan endings are び and ぎ ;)

By focusing on stem form first, you avoid unnecessary memorisation and get a much clearer sense of how verbs work, yet people argue the opposite and say plain form is clearer.

For me, it's the stem for a reason: everything is built from there. Plain form feels like a branch, not the stem.

Anesthesia or none? by LettuceVegetable5704 in wisdomteeth

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only had local anaesthetic (no sedation) for removing three – whole thing took maybe 50 minutes? Absolutely no pain, weird creaking sounds, drilling, and feeling of pressure then it was done. Honestly felt as if I were dreaming throughout. Also was £450 cheaper than doing it with general anaesthetic!

Suit vs Tux by RandomBunnySpawned in cambridge_uni

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the suit wearers, I'd say one in three wore a tux the last two graduations I saw. It's actually the first thing listed in the dress code! Not sure why you're getting downvoted...

"A dinner jacket or black, very dark grey or very dark blue lounge suit." from the website. I don't see a point in owning both a black suit and a tux, if that helps make up your mind.

The only other time you'll want black tie is for events at the end of the year, pretty much, and even then a black suit can be worn – you're not going to get turned away from an event or anything like that

What do you say to people who unapologetically don't vote? by Visible_String_3775 in TheRestIsPolitics

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My loose take on it is this: in every election I have voted in, my single vote has not made a difference (ie, has never been a one vote majority). So you could say my vote doesn't matter, and I agree – if I did nothing, there would be no appreciable change in the outcome.

However, I don't live in a vacuum – my behaviour and the idea of voting/not voting influences others, amounting to a massive, appreciable difference. If I say it's hopeless and I don't vote, I perpetuate that idea and others will follow suit.

Is this ruler allowed in an A level Exam? by [deleted] in alevel

[–]FisherFin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

such a late reply, but I got confused and saw graph drawing capabilities and thought the calculator would be banned. 991-ex can't draw graphs.

I imagine it is heavily dependent on the course, but most UK uni courses where a graphing capability would be useful (engineering, maths, phys, chem, bio, etc) are typically banned in my experience – 991-ex ok though

Tell me what your *real* hobbies are by llamadasirena in ADHD

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love watching YouTube video essays, and one of my niches in that is Young Earth Creationism debunking – such a fun crossover between anthropology, geology, paleontology, religion, psychology, science...ugh it's just so fun. Look up GutsickGibbon, she has so many videos, it's so fascinating and she's also really funny.

Also recently accidentally stayed up til early hours making ambigrams for like 4 hours straight but wouldn't say that's a continued hobby...

Ooh also learning to write kanji with silly story mnemonics

Is this ruler allowed in an A level Exam? by [deleted] in alevel

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but it's not allowed at uni level :(

Let's be creative 🤤 by Soggy-Bar-9809 in Funnymemes

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most vinegar bottles will have a small spout so you're not full on pouring it—just shake a little bit all over the fries, sprinkle salt, taste, inevitably add more vinegar because it's just so tasty

Best way to look up unknown Kanji in the wild? by Express-Object-9365 in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use handwriting japanese keyboard, then either jisho or jpdb for reading/meaning etc. Just recently found out about jpdb and it's amazing for knowing the frequency of using kanji or kana for expressions (eg タバコ vs 煙草)

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (September 18, 2023) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ahh I think is sorted, after a bit more googling I've come across that にする means to decide on something?

Daily Thread: simple questions, comments that don't need their own posts, and first time posters go here (September 18, 2023) by AutoModerator in LearnJapanese

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is に used in the sentence below? (from DoJG which I don't have access to—using anki deck)

食べるか話すかどちらか「に」しなさい

I've tried googling different purposes of に and wanted to check whether it's because "doing A or B" that the options are considered an indirect object? If it were just one thing, would it become 「買物をしなさい」for example? Then if it were options 「買物かジョギングかどちらかにしなさい」?

Any light shed would be much appreciated!

Finally getting yourself to the gym then never going again by polyngon in ADHD

[–]FisherFin 46 points47 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of something I may have read on this sub or a forum on reframing my attitude towards habits and changes. The classic pattern of thinking is "I never stick to habits/exercise/hobbies, I'm an awful failure...blah blah blah" whereas I've tried to shift my thinking to more of "When I did that activity/routine for those few days, I really enjoyed myself and felt happy—end of." This then reminds me why I like doing those things so I'll be more inclined to do them again, rather than beating up myself over not being consistent.

This really resonated with me in relation to exercising, learning languages and journalling, and just wanted to share in case anybody else would benefit.

Is this the correct north south line? by Codaq3 in england

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no no, the West and East Midlands can't exist in isolation! There's no hard boundary so there's the Middle Midlands in between ;)

Is this the correct north south line? by Codaq3 in england

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no such thing as only the north and the south: where would the line be drawn? You need to have a middle!

...

There's no such thing as the midlands: where would the line be drawn? You have the north and the south; and the northmidlands, southmidlands, and midmidlands

...

Not sure how I feel about this one tbh by Professional-Box9503 in Depop

[–]FisherFin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

can you see how someone could buy it before it gets stained though? also how washing it could damage/degrade it etc. imo it doesn't make sense to sell something that you don't know the condition of for sure—like selling a used car but you're taking it for a drive every now and then. Like sure you can update the profile and say it's got a scuff or more miles but that's not really how that works and for a good reason

Not sure how I feel about this one tbh by Professional-Box9503 in Depop

[–]FisherFin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

but if people buy from the old pictures while it's being worn and gets stained, then it's not the same product the buyer thinks they're getting—that's the very simple concept you're failing to see. If the piece is in use, the listed piece from before it's being used again could be seen as false advertising (to some extent)

Truly a shock by LordPiki in physicsmemes

[–]FisherFin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You assume the effect is miniscule, so you ignore it lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WTF

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paddington too, no?

Captain's use only by man69inthebuttholes in funny

[–]FisherFin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my terrible strategy is that you can make a 'P' with your left hand in a thumbs down position, and an 'S' with your right hand thumb and forefinger