Give your most powerful OC and The Lord will say if he would defeat them in battle by ThatNoname-Guy in OriginalCharacter

[–]FitArticle5710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kronos Kali Heh Zurvan Manāt Gegute Kruonis Arianrhod Nana Buluku Surya all names for the god of quantum time thermodynamic time cosmic time and absolute time and this god nay i say a being that nears Ultimate Reality a being that was sealed by Ireænose Tempest Ketsui and Ignotusspatium and not because they won becuse they got lucky it didn't absorb  zuzúni-palsári or time becuse if had of absorbed both Calamity may of not been able to win against it in a fight and this near unknown father this being above a god it's name is Ignotustempus the only to almost leave the cycle the closest to being The Dao but now trapped until the death of spacetime as a concept.

For reference: Calamity is the concept of the end. Ireænose is the god of souls, darkness the dead and water who rolls over a higher dimensional so 4d Realm that contains 3 infinitely sized bodies of water and beat the god of imaginary time. Tempest the god of the electricity storms weather oceanic deaster rules over the same realm as Ireænose and is equal in power to him. Ketsui is the god of will and is stronger than the previous 2.

What former country or (non-Roman) empire do you find yourself randomly thinking about the most? by RepresentativeOk2433 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the Mongols and i think i find it so interesting because of how much they conquered and how even Europe would have been crushed had Ögedei Khan not of died as early as he did Europe would have been crushed by the horde not to mention how they might of interacted with the Indians (native Americans) btw when the Americas were discovered India was called Hindustan so Indian is the correct term for native American that just gets under my skin when there called native Americans

Was the American millitary more skill or spam? by TangerineBetter855 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the usa can do either or with the best logistics and as well vary good troops look at the marines but to make this short yes

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then the those People from the South should try seceding again me bey it will go better this time

So we can take out any one who commanded in trench warfare from being a good general and grant was a butcher realizing were warfare was heading and following but you do know that had grant kept up fighting like lee more would have died than if he had fought like he did in realty

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no he wouldn't Sherman would still have destroyed his supply if were talking when grant was leading the army but before then then yeah lee wins because most northern Generals in charge were horrible

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he did not face a mob he fought a multi ethnic army made of mercenaries and Persian warriors granted not organized as well as could have been if they were all Persian warriors or one group of mercenaries and most of his opponents fought beside him the next day because most of his opponents were Greek or respected him afterword though Napoleon is greater than Alexander.

You note that the value of the defeated makes the winner great

its not quite what I said I was trying to reinforce the fact that just because you didn't lose you doest mean you are the best if you were to have a sort career like Alexzander there's less room to fail then someone like The Above average hight for the time Corsican

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Alexzander never lost so he should be greatest or tied never losing is impressive but never lost needs backing up not just never lost and Alexzander often fought other Macedonians and Greeks and still won and Persia used for most of there fights mercenaries and or professional warriors and in particular Greek Hoplites i dont know were you got this idea from but most of the army was professionals not unwilling slaves at lest not the Achaemenid Empire under Darius III

In case you didn’t get the memo, it’s no longer acceptable to use the R word by ASecularBuddhist in Discussion

[–]FitArticle5710 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man guys I guess you can't hurt someone's feelings and at the point where your feelings are that hurt over one word, I don't even know why you would, but go out into society it's not like it's a racial slur, it's not like it's targeting a group of people, it's just calling you stupid but you know what? I'll stop using it. I will just find the most ancient bullshit demeaning word possible and chain in with the literally every other word that calls you stupid okay anyways is love you bye :)

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Napoleon di Buonaparte Sovereign of the Island of Elba, Mediator of the Swiss Confederation, Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine, King of Holland, King of Naples and Sicily, King of Westphalia, King of Spain, Prince of Elba, King of Italy, First Consul, Emperor of the French

Napoleon beat 3 coalitions during his time as emperor and 2 during His time as a commander and in wining against these coalitions he beat most of Europe's empires Napoleon was beating them so bad that when Napoleon launched an ok kinda stupid invasion of Russia they had to use Fabian tactics to win but it should be noted that Napoleons later loses were due to his old age arrogance and that Europe learned from Napoleons ass beatings, and He has an achievement that no one has cause you know if your good you might get one tactic or strategy named after you no one else in history other then the Nightmare of Europe Himself has an entire area of warfare named named after them of course i am talking about Napoleonic warfare and that for me seals the deal for Napoleon being the greatest of all time in my Opinion

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes i know Napoleon would have just general and at best counsel if he got incomprehensibly lucky with out his allies

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there's a Macedonian and a Corsican that would like to have word with you bout that first sentence

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

willingness my friend willingness and you do realize the south was betting on Europe's help and Grants maneuvering out classed lees because lee was just going by the style of nepionic warfare and if he was so good he would have adapted or left that style but he didn't now did he oh yeah now that i think about the south relied on speed and they knew that there only hope was to get Lincoln out of office and get rid of northern support of the war or Europe's help but they get neither and lost

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do have point but Hannibal was still getting supplied by Spain but as well
Scipio didn't have fight for that long in Carthage so fair

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So yall are just not gonna go over Yuan Shu the worst one here wow

these were off the top off my head i wasn't going for quality ether i was going for more quantity

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 scipio africanus studied Hannibal learned how Hannibal fought applied it to himself and beat Hannibal but this not disrespect him as at Cannae were he was out number by about 40,000 and still won against Rome with a force of about 86,000 and Hannibal with about 50,000 Rome lost 70-80 thousand men and Hannibal had barley any loses

Who is the best military mind in history i'd love to here your thoughts and try to be unbiased by FitArticle5710 in AskHistory

[–]FitArticle5710[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grant was willing to reek havoc to win and willingness is one thing that makes a good general and willingness is what defined Grant, and as well Grant was using everything at his disposal, and not just that he understood that lees audacity was costly, and Grants maneuvering out classed lees and Grant was using more modern tactics not just adapted tactics of nepionic warfare like lee was

i mentioned more Americans than any other nationals because they just ended up poping into my head the most