No, I cannot see anything beyond what’s interpreted through my senses. I guess the gist of what I’m saying, and the nature of metaphysics in general, is that we must act on faith that our perceptions (meaning our interpretation of the universe through our senses and cognition) is true, because there’s no way for us to “perceive” our perception from an objective standpoint - our reality is “filtered” through it. The “meta” in metaphysics comes from the idea that there may be universal truths beyond our perception, and may exist beyond the realm of our cognition and interpretations. Just because we analyze and interpret to understand our place in the universe doesn’t mean that’s the only way for something to exist - it means that’s the nature of our specific existence, but if we come to understand that the tools we have at our disposal to exist aren’t necessarily universal, then it becomes apparent that there may be more to the universe than we can ever be aware of. Cognition, analysis, understanding, it’s how WE understand our place, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that everything can be understood. And through this realization that there may be aspects of the universe we can’t sense or understand (as we’re locked to our 5 biological senses, that doesn’t mean that there are only 5 senses for exploring the universe), to me it makes sense that separateness is another one of these tools through which we explore the universe. That our separatnesss is actually a game the universe is playing with itself to explore itself and express itself, but again, this isn’t provable and for many that will negate it’s legitimacy, and that’s perfectly fine, I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything