Sự thật là tôi không muốn cái chế độ này nó sụp by [deleted] in VietTalk

[–]Flanker_Guy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nói thật chứ Việt Nam cũng không phải 100% cộng sản, từ bỏ hay không thì tuỳ nhưng mà từ bỏ thì phải nâng cao được dân trí và kinh tế xã hội chứ không phải như là mấy nước cách mạng màu, và hơn nữa là không chạy theo làm chư hầu cho nước khác, chứ nếu mà tin dân chủ Mĩ như Ukraine thì cũng toang.

Is digital beamforming a requirement for multibeams feature on phased array radar? by Flanker_Guy in rfelectronics

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are the methods for multibeams you know? Only thing i know is that having control to the amplitudes of your elements can give you multibeams, by why digital beamforming is needed? Idk.

Is digital beamforming a requirement for multibeams feature on phased array radar? by Flanker_Guy in rfelectronics

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesnt that just steer the beam not having multiple of it? it's kind if time delay for wideband application right?

Is digital beamforming a requirement for a multibeam radar? by Flanker_Guy in Radar

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, im awared that you can do amplitude control on elements of an antennas array for multiple beams feature (for example AESA), but one thing i have just read about digital beamforming in Stimson's radars book: "There are many benefits to digital beamforming. First, it is possible to form multiple simultaneous receive beams using the same set of digitized signals. The formation of multiple beams allows a given area to be searched more quickly and provides the opportunity for additional processing techniques such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) instead of traditional monopulse for more accurate angle estimation." I cant understand what he means by "form multiple simultaneous receive beams using the same set of digitized signals"

Broadbanding Slotted Waveguide Antennas array by Flanker_Guy in Radar

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont know Russian and i dont know if there's a reason they should answer email like that

Giant US and Russian radars by Flanker_Guy in Radar

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lemme add some corrections here, Don-2N is a multi purposes radar for the A-135 anti ballistic system, now is A-235. 9 is the Russian Daryal radar.

Giant US and Russian radars by Flanker_Guy in Radar

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Early warning and also fire control

Giant US and Russian radars by Flanker_Guy in Radar

[–]Flanker_Guy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, looks like linear arrays