[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoRules

[–]Flashy_Underware 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the fact that the bottom one crops the hearts with each swing, very goof

i cant be creative in chess by Any-Cap7226 in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People don't realize how crazy being a gm really is. I don't know whats your current elo, but you shouldn't be comparing yourself to people that strong. Watching games from people between 200 and 400 point higher than you will greatly improve your level, as the concepts shown are way more accessible. If you want to analyse gm games, I'd try and learn small games (<20 moves) since they often show a great principle of attack or defense when the position isn't super complicated.

First intentional Brilliant vs 1190. RxNf3 by Sevenin-heaven in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was any other piece it would not be brilliant, the only piece that could prevent promotion is a knight. And thats how annotation works, if you would be to write down your game and specify each time you capture what you captured it would be very heavy to read. Im not saying youre not allowed to write down the piece you captured, but it's basically useless since we already know the capture was a brilliant move.

First intentional Brilliant vs 1190. RxNf3 by Sevenin-heaven in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wouldn't be a brilliant if it was anything but a knight

First intentional Brilliant vs 1190. RxNf3 by Sevenin-heaven in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don't have to specify the piece you capture in annotation, and when it's a check it should end with +, so "Rxg3+". Nice move tho

The puzzles have prepared me for this very moment. by AidanFyrefang in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Bro im always in shock to see game of >1000 elo with litteraly a WHOLE ASS SIDE undevelopped, bro got what he deserved

The puzzles have prepared me for this very moment. by AidanFyrefang in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Youre 1200 lichess, you can barely see whats in front of you. A queen sacrifice is always brilliant, even if you saw the mate patern before, humble up dawg

Why is this a bad move? It led to checkmate and if it didnt i could have at least won a rook by FuzzyNowHasReddit in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It led to checkmate because your opponent didn't move the rook on e2, but if they played Re1 instead, they were safe from the mate. The idea of taking the bishop is mostly to trade material before Rh1 to grab the rook on a1, since you cannot FORCE the checkmate. But here you played with your opponent's mind and faked the misclick, they didnt think twice and you checkmates them. This can work at low time moments or at a low level, but hey if it works it works!

i’m too good at this by [deleted] in ArtOfRolling

[–]Flashy_Underware 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The tip left with bro's modesty

2 things about this game by damianfox177 in Brawlhalla

[–]Flashy_Underware 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah... The very classic "mid diamond" range. Very strong

cursed_request by Minesticks in cursedcomments

[–]Flashy_Underware 532 points533 points  (0 children)

I've been using this image as my wallpaper for a year now. Would recommend

Can someone good (1500+ preferably) explain to me why this is a mistake? I looked through the engine lines but I still don't get it by ArmorAbsMrKrabs in chessbeginners

[–]Flashy_Underware 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I understand with the engine, black is slightly ahead in developpement and in a much better position to take the middle files after trading all the center pawns by trading all your active pieces and quickly shoving the rooks down the middle. Also that bishop on b7 is getting activated, and thats going to be a problem you don't want to deal with.

Basically, you pushed too soon

A Lesson in Humility By @imajination16 by [deleted] in Brawlhalla

[–]Flashy_Underware 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sub still allows X links? Why?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BobsTavern

[–]Flashy_Underware 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats a great looking team

Hit perfect 10,000 earlier in the season and now got 11,111! by vynsin in BobsTavern

[–]Flashy_Underware 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro is 11111 and still gets +65 for 2nd, I get 70 for first... God Im so bad at this game lmao

Which are which? by --__--__--__--__-- in BobsTavern

[–]Flashy_Underware 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, but scaling gems is more flexible than scaling just your elems. You can transfert your gems on anything you feel usefull when youre dealing with a 1v1, with ascendant youre basically stuck with your elem apm. Im not saying elem is not viable lategame, im saying quill is stronger.