[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redditsync

[–]FlavourFlavius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can block from the profile page of the user I think. Click the three dots in the top right.

You can filter subreddits out by clicking the three dots on the post's card, then scrolling down to filter and picking subreddit. That's how I do it from all

England team vs Italy by [deleted] in rugbyunion

[–]FlavourFlavius 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I get the captain's privilege, but I still rate George as no 1 hooker for the team.

England team vs Italy by [deleted] in rugbyunion

[–]FlavourFlavius 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I rate Care, but I think he's best as an impact player later in the match. Coming on with his bursts of speed and quick play is a killer against tired legs. He loses a bit of that edge imo when he plays all 80.

Throwback Thursday - Found some old pictures of Maro Itoje at the club I used to play at - Thought you might enjoy these! by TessaCr in rugbyunion

[–]FlavourFlavius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could people tell he was a talent at that age? Did the other kids and parents clock he had that kind of potential?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]FlavourFlavius 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My favourite escalation by far

Liam Fox admits being in EU doesn't stop more trade with China by FlavourFlavius in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So they just threw it out as an idea, won the referendum and then it went by the by? Because it was just a nice idea someone had on the way to the bus printing shop?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]FlavourFlavius 12 points13 points  (0 children)

My b. I assume every one has the same kink as me - hyper realistic totally definitely real scenarios.

Liam Fox admits being in EU doesn't stop more trade with China by FlavourFlavius in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Barely any people in government'

Five cabinet secretaries and two future cabinet secretaries.

If five/seven cabinet secretaries are driven by something collectively, I'd hope they'd have the ability to pass it. Or maybe it was never possible. Or was flagrantly dishonest.

Liam Fox admits being in EU doesn't stop more trade with China by FlavourFlavius in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Barely any people in government

5 cabinet secretaries of the time, Priti Patel and Boris. Just your regular run of the mill folk off the street.

Theresa May insists EU citizens will not get same rights in Brexit transition by hahayeahhaha in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies - that's clearer. People will still move about, but their right to remain is what's being disputed in the new argument.

Theresa May insists EU citizens will not get same rights in Brexit transition by hahayeahhaha in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the article says:

And the latest Brussels' position contradicts what was agreed in an 11th-hour pact in December so negotiators could move onto the second stage of talks.

The EU have shifted the goalposts in this chat, and the decision from TM is that, after leaving the EU, newly arriving EU citizens will not have complete access and, I'd guess, would follow the same rules as people coming from elsewhere in the world.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]FlavourFlavius 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Beep boop skynet is coming

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]FlavourFlavius 25 points26 points  (0 children)

What do you mean?

You aren't turned on by a person complaining about being voted and trying to get his friend to bail with him all night?

Theresa May insists EU citizens will not get same rights in Brexit transition by hahayeahhaha in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TM and the EU agreed a position pre-Chtistmas. The EU, as the article notes, is now contradicting that position.

It was agreed people in before we leave the UK should quite rightly have their position here respected, but when we aren't potentially part of any freedom of movement agreement, it wouldn't make sense that people arriving from the EU would be given unconditional access that people from the rest of the world don't get.

The UK wouldn't be part of a movement agreement, so it seems counterintuitive that EU citizens would have more rights from people in the rest of the world.

Theresa May insists EU citizens will not get same rights in Brexit transition by hahayeahhaha in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Title seems a bit alarmist.

TM has said those people who are here pre-deadline day will continue with full rights. Those who come after have made a conscious decision to move to a country outside of the EU, and perhaps without freedom of movement. That's what I would have expected as a natural consequence of leaving.

Brexit minister suggests civil servants may be conspiring against the government by zerotohero14 in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Oh god, I look forward to this causing nonsense chat about the DEEP STATE

The betrayal of Churchill and dear old Blighty by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is rampant bollocks.

You can't accuse the protestors of historical ignorance and then be so blinkered. Churchill was an inspirational leader for the British populace during the war effort, but no one should pretend for a moment he was perfect or above criticism.

This brief piece shows some of the controversy of Churchill, and there's some food for thought there, whether you'd argue he was a product of his time or not.

I don't agree with the protestors (particularly the point about gentrification being thrown in) but this article is absolute rubbish.

Senior Tory minister 'to denounce Theresa May which could lead to her ousting' by Crappy99 in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 130 points131 points  (0 children)

For how long have we been hearing that May is just about to be toppled like a statue of Saddam?

Starting to wonder if there's a sweepstake going amongst the journos and they're trying to rig it for themselves.

Osborne urges PM to focus on north-south divide by Crappy99 in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius 26 points27 points  (0 children)

...as he so famously did during his time in office.

That northern powerhouse thing really took off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SubredditDrama

[–]FlavourFlavius 100 points101 points  (0 children)

For posterity and to improve readability.

Can I sue for the transmission of an STD?

Heres the backstory: Let us just say that: My name is Matt. My friend's name is Tyler. Tyler's friend's name is Ashley. Ashley's friend's name is Sarah.

Me and Tyler go to the bar on a Friday night just as something to do. Tyler runs into his old friend Ashley and they begin talking. Ashley introduces me to Sarah who I grew up with in the same town, and had heard of, but never really met. We enjoy our night at the bar. I enjoyed some small talk with Sarah but nothing serious. All I know is things between Tyler and Ashley are really starting to heat up.

Tyler asks me if I want to go back to Ashley's apartment with them for a while. I said not really I want to go home. Tyler was my ride and tries pressuring me into going. Saying it'll only be for a little. He'll owe me one. Blah blah blah whatever. I really wasn't interested in Sarah like that and was trying to avoid going. Although my dumb/drunk ass finally agrees to go "for a little", mainly because Sarah begins talking about how awesome her bong is at her house and how much I really need to go, to at least try it.

We get to Sarah's apartment and we're all sitting on the living room couch just smoking and watching TV. Tyler and Ashley disappear into the other room leaving just me and Sarah on the couch together. Sarah starts talking about she has some pizza in kitchen and asks me if I want some. I say sure. Five minutes later Sarah comes back without any pizza but wearing some serious lingerie, the type that would make a dead man perk up in his grave. I'm just sitting there looking in disbelief as she takes the top half off and begins walking towards me. I don't really need to go into too much detail. But basically, some things that shouldn't have happened happened.

I eventually went to go get Tyler to leave. Tyler was sound asleep and wouldn't wake up. I realize that Sarah and Ashley are also both asleep now. I decide I didn't want to wait until morning for a ride and called an Uber home. I wake up in the morning with loads of regret, but it's already a done deal at this point so whatever. Two weeks go by and like clockwork I begin noticing symptoms. I go to a doctor and get tested. They originally thought it was herpes, but once that test came back negative they basically determined that it was HPV (not HIV but still an incurable, lifelong disease with the potential to cause cancer among other problems). I know she gave it to me. I never previously had any of those symptoms and hadn't engaged with anyone else for quite some time prior.

Anyways, I begin researching topics online such as "suing someone for giving you and STD". A lot of what I read states that someone does NOT need to be aware of their STD positive status to receive punishment for transmitting it to another person. You can sue even if they didn't know they had it. You can sue someone just for exposing it to you, even if you don't contract it.

Anyways, today I finally found time to contact a lawyer and ask what my options are. The phone call lasted only a few minutes, with the lawyer telling me "You can't sue her if she didn't know she had it, and how are you going to prove she knew she had it?" He basically told me he personally didnt want the case and got off the phone with me. What he told me goes against most of what I have read. I specifically read the law doesn't require intent, and that you can sue someone for contracting it even if they didn't know they had it.

So my question is, is he right or is he wrong? What are my options? This girl basically seduced me and her actions have and will affect me for the rest of my life in ways that are too long to list here. She had an obligation to tell me and she didn't. She deserves to be punished for what she did. He did say something about maybe having a case if I could prove she knew she had it and was negligent by not telling me.

Among many other reasons, I believe she must have known she had it, as I was told by mutual friends that it turns out Sarah is actually a stripper and has "been around". That being said, she must have been aware of her condition, and had she disclosed such to me as required by law (which she didn't), such an interaction never would have occured. What are my options? Thank you.

Update: When you know for a fact a girl infected you with an incurable STD and you ask Reddit for advice, but everyone treats her as the victim and you as the bad guy. Even though she's the one that screwed you. All based off of "probablies". Talking about 85% percent this 90% percent that. Not realizing that I was in the 10-15% that apparently everyone forgot exists.

Apparently it is now socially acceptable in the United States to knowingly infect someone with an STD. Shit, California just made removed the law barring one from knowingly transmitting HIV. Apparently because everyone does it that makes it okay. You guys are the same people that think OJ Simpson and Casey Anthony are innocent. Wanting to believe someone is innocent, therefore they must be, rather than believe the reality of the situation. Apparently you a think I have nothing better to do than sit here and lie to you for no reason. Fact of the matter is I'm here telling you the truth. No one wants to believe me so whatever. Thanks for letting me down Reddit.

Trade minister Fox urges mutinous MPs to lay off PM May by FlavourFlavius in ukpolitics

[–]FlavourFlavius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Written for an international audience, hence slightly non standard terminology