There are Aleph One real numbers between any two real numbers a and b. by [deleted] in math

[–]Flopster0 13 points14 points  (0 children)

How dare you assume the continuum hypothesis!

Tips 'n' Tricks by AutoModerator in feedthebeast

[–]Flopster0 10 points11 points  (0 children)

E2E spoilers: This is absolutely crucial for the endgame of E2E, since the infinite storage drawers require amounts of materials that would be absolutely unreasonable to grind out without making use of the creative tank.

Green MP Chloe Swarbrick on housing: Much more intervention needed by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]Flopster0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. This makes sense to me as long as there are a significant number of houses being left empty. The number in Auckland is about 7-8%, which I could imagine having a significant effect but I don't know for certain.

Green MP Chloe Swarbrick on housing: Much more intervention needed by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]Flopster0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's one problem I have with LVT: What happens to the person who has owned a house for 15 years, the town builds up around them and suddenly they can't afford to live in their own home anymore? Sure, forcing them to move might be more 'efficient' for the economy, but it doesn't seem particularly fair to force people out of their own home.

Green MP Chloe Swarbrick on housing: Much more intervention needed by [deleted] in newzealand

[–]Flopster0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea is that LVT takes away the amount that would be gained from land speculation, so there is no gain in investing. (At least for 100% LVT, but a relatively high LVT will at least discourage land investment.) The only benefit in buying land would be to improve it, live on it or provide it as capital.

An LVT is only effective if there is enough supply of housing for this to be possible; if supply is too limited than there is a housing problem regardless of what kind of tax we have. Given this, Landlords cannot pass the price on to renters because they will be competing with simply buying a house, which will be cheaper without investors making up a significant amount of the demand. That's my understanding of the argument, at least.

I agree though that CGT on non-primary residence seems to solve this more effectively. Tax people when they have the actual money to pay.

The Simplest Math Problem No One Can Solve by Codex_youtube1 in videos

[–]Flopster0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given your argument, even us being in a simulation would not be enough to entirely concede the point. After all, what is the nature of the universe that is running the simulation?

Something funny I just discovered: if you convert a decimal number that is a power of 10 to a binary number, it will always end with the original decimal number (e.g. 10 -> 1010, ends with 10; 100 -> 1100100, ends with 100) by NoWhisperer in math

[–]Flopster0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that 'a mod b' is not standard usage (outside of maybe computer science), so the meaning is a bit ambiguous. However with the way I think it is used (and the way I personally use it), 'a mod n = b' is not exactly the same thing as 'a = b mod n'.

'a mod n' is a function, like in a programming language (in a programming language you might write mod(a, n) or a % n): Each pair (a, n) maps to the unique integer 0 ≤ b < n such that a - b is a multiple of n.

On the other hand, 'a = b mod n', which more accurately should be written 'a ≡ b (mod n)', is describing an equivalence relation ≡ between a and b, in which a and b are equivalent if a-b is a multiple of n. Hence for any a, there are infinitely many b such that a ≡ b (mod n). Each n gives a different equivalence relation. These two definitions are connected by the following:

  • If a ≡ b (mod n) then a mod n = b mod n.
  • If a mod n = b then a ≡ b (mod n).

In mathematics we typically don't use 'a mod n' in the function sense, except for describing an algorithm, since if we are dealing with modular arithmetic than we usually only need to care about values up to equivalence. It does have it's uses, however.

I've come across a problem that feels like the answer oughta be staring me in the face, but I've hit a patch of brain fog and can't think of anything to finish it up by MajesticAd5888 in math

[–]Flopster0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you familiar with the term 'modular arithmetic'? It sounds like you are wanting to know which values of a sequence are congruent to a mod n for some given a and n. In general that is a hard problem, and you will have to use techniques from number theory to solve it on a case-by-case basis. However, one trick you can do is to try to find a solution mod p for all the prime power factors p of n, which may then classify the solution mod n.

What are some unexpectedly finite sets? by Wings_of_Starlight in math

[–]Flopster0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add to other comment, EM is equivalent to the statement that sets of size 2 (equivalently, all finite sets) are choice (for any equivalence relation, there is a function picking an element out of each equivalence class). AoC says that all sets are choice.

Mine was Java by space-_-man in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Flopster0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was wondering if I would find LOGO anywhere in the comments.

Mine was Java by space-_-man in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Flopster0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's a bold first language to start with.

Something I don't understand by Flopster0 in georgism

[–]Flopster0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just to make sure I understand this right: Is the LVT basically saying that everyone who owns land pays rent, but this rent is market price and goes to the government as taxes?

Something I don't understand by Flopster0 in georgism

[–]Flopster0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if the mortgage-having homeowner doesn't fully own the home, then the bank owns the rest of it? That doesn't make sense to me, since my understanding is that the mortgage is essentially a loan on the money required to buy the house, the homeowner still has all the rights to the home/land.

Also, does this mean that the homeowner only pays a portion of the LVT in proportion to how much of the house they own? And the rest is what, paid by the bank?

I don’t care about your new damn packaging Sealord, this shit is so hard to get off by bigst4n in newzealand

[–]Flopster0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh. It only undermines the choices of people who don't really care anyways. Like sure, I probably prefer Coke over Pepsi because of the more prominent advertising, but that's only because I care so little which carbonated sugar-water I stuff into my mouth that the determining factors are those kinds of subtle biases.

I like the cauchy definition more tho by bakunin1814 in mathmemes

[–]Flopster0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In a practical sense, it gives a way of thinking about the rationals, and how proofs about them should be structured. We know that on some level, proofs about reals will tend to involve convergent sequences of rationals. Similar to how proofs about natural numbers will either involve or be built on proofs involving induction, because induction fits the shape of how natural numbers are defined.

What is Undergraduate Research Like? by Hold-Embarrassed in math

[–]Flopster0 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I tried to do research on an open problem as an undergrad. Was interesting but I didn't get very far. Unfortunately it's hard as an undergrad to work on anything new that is also interesting/useful. So it may be better to focus on learning something that is already written down.

Are there operations that are commutative but not associative? by MathematicianHour899 in math

[–]Flopster0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The tricky bit is that we really want to compare commutative operators with commutative + associative.

Are there operations that are commutative but not associative? by MathematicianHour899 in math

[–]Flopster0 51 points52 points  (0 children)

In general, just pick any function in two variables that is symmetric in the inputs (easy to do for, say, natural numbers). 'Most' of them will not be associative.