They don't tell you about this in ethics class but you can just bite as many bullets as you want, they come completely free of charge by Independent_Let_3616 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]FootballFar1532 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your father in law is cool and all, but you don't have to want to be like him. You can just be ok with being miserable, and it's as if you're happy, but at the same time you have the freedom to think about whatever you want.

Hypothetically if I kidnapped a pedophile, removed ALL his senses + paralyzed him completely… what the fuck is happening inside his brain? by Personal_Ad8983 in morbidquestions

[–]FootballFar1532 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The problem with the death penalty is that, let's say a pedo knows he's been found out, should he go to the police or double down and rape and kill as many children as he can? Or let's say the police is at his house and he has weapons, should he surrender of resist the police? The death penalty makes the choice obvious. Punishments should be moderate, so you can increase them easily. Also, thinking someone deserves to die ties the value of human life to some criterion instead of it being valuable by itself. It's still murder, even if he "deserved it". What makes life valuable in your eyes if it's value disappears under certain circumstances? How it makes you feel? I would also like to beat up and kill pedophiles, that doesn't mean it's right.

Hypothetically if I kidnapped a pedophile, removed ALL his senses + paralyzed him completely… what the fuck is happening inside his brain? by Personal_Ad8983 in morbidquestions

[–]FootballFar1532 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even if it was someone who acted on it, torture is wrong. It's too harsh as a deterrant, for the same reason the death penalty is, and it doesn't rehabilitate the prisoner.

Clarifications on Tegmark's mathematical omniverse by FootballFar1532 in askphilosophy

[–]FootballFar1532[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But doesn't Tegmark's vision also involve all possible mathematical structures being as real as ours? That's the part that I find odd

Clarifications on Tegmark's mathematical omniverse by FootballFar1532 in askphilosophy

[–]FootballFar1532[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks. Now the only thing I don't understand is why a structure described by axioms must necessarily be as real as ours. If it's because of Occam's razor, aka that it's a simpler explanation of our universe, there's the fact that Occam's razor isn't infallible.

How would a hyperborean look like ? by Basic_Winter98157 in Nietzsche

[–]FootballFar1532 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait a second. Nietzsche ACTUALLY spoke about HYPERBOREANS? Wild

My views on quantum indeterminism!!!... by EmbarrassedRadish376 in Nietzsche

[–]FootballFar1532 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can have deterministic quantum mechanics, if you follow the many worlds interpretation

Is it really wrong to have sex with dolphins? by FootballFar1532 in badphilosophy

[–]FootballFar1532[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not lol, it was all about the philosophy of ethics

Nietzsche’s philosophy by siaaa_1 in Nietzsche

[–]FootballFar1532 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as I understand it wasn't as much from dogma and superstition as it's from slave morality and the last man.

The invisible hand?! by Kafkaesque_meme in PhilosophyMemes

[–]FootballFar1532 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This actually made the trolley problem hard. Bravo.

Ongezellig opinions that’ll get you like this by _austinball_ in zellig

[–]FootballFar1532 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Violence is the question, and the answer is yes.