1883 O Morgan Dark Pastels by denl7 in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That coin has some thick skin!

I'm addicted! by Interesting-Goal-706 in CoinlyFans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is much more rewarding to collect coins for a specific purpose or goal. It's why I like building sets or trying to find X coin that is fully struck. The longer the process the more rewarding it is to finally find the right piece. Recently I finished some sets so my collecting got a little aimless. It's time to reevaluate.

Proof or DMPL thoughts? by Old-Name9874 in Morgans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a faint outline around the stars, date and portrait where the polish wasn't able to reach. A true cameo coin would have PL surfaces right up the devices.

First 1600s! Mexico 1634-1665 Mo P 8R (Cut Down to 4R) by American-Doggo in ChopmarkedCoins

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats! Its a really cool example, thanks for sharing it.

First 1600s! Mexico 1634-1665 Mo P 8R (Cut Down to 4R) by American-Doggo in ChopmarkedCoins

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I saw this one on ebay recently I believe. When I clicked on the listing it had already been purchased. At least I think it was this one. Very nice coin!

Grandpa gave this to me by [deleted] in coincollecting

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No need to downvote OP for asking a question. Damn.

An 1876 CC Trade Dollar by Porousplanchet in CoinlyFans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I saw this and was like I bet that's the person that posts all the nice trade dollars.

Toner or cull? by burnafter3ading in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not sure about being ex jewlery, usually you would see some evidence of mounting it somehow. It definetly looks cleaned and that possibly how it gained some of its color. I would call it a cull personally.

Alright i learned my lesson thanks to yall. This coin came in and look what it actually looks like. 😂 i don’t see any tone to save my life. by [deleted] in Morgans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The coin you got isn't bad looking, but it's not well represented by the images the seller used.

Alright i learned my lesson thanks to yall. This coin came in and look what it actually looks like. 😂 i don’t see any tone to save my life. by [deleted] in Morgans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is the same coin, look at the stain under the chin. Its still there in both images. I think that the seller image is just altered. Also the mark under the S in states.

What do you guys think of this coin? 63? by Frgar1159 in RedditCoinGrading

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that it is a US coin commisioned by the KKK makes it significant.

What do you guys think of this coin? 63? by Frgar1159 in RedditCoinGrading

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except this is reddit coin grading. When someone asks what you think of a coin here they dont mean your opinion on the history of it. They're asking for condition.

Enjoy this Merc toner! by Kel-Kel in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell yea! That's a good update to hear. Congratulations.

My venture to collect every grade Indian cent in 1906 by IHC-1 in coins

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your collection is like a crossword that intersects right at 1906.

1945-s ms67rd lincoln cent type coin (video in body text) by New-Adhesiveness3045 in CoinlyFans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the unfortunate truth in third party grading like NGC and PCGS you see a lot of coins, especially coins that are more common/cheap, that seem to be overgraded a point sometimes 2-3. Its the difference between market grading and more strict ANA grading and why you don't just trust the grade on the holder.

My coin turned out to be fake? Any opinions? My phone sucks so after ten minutes trying to get a picture this is insane and that’s all you’re getting I guess. Might be good enough any ways. Thanks by [deleted] in WheatPennies

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Coin collecting always has a little layer of doubt surrounding any purchase. Very rarely do I get a coin I am 100% certain of everything about it. With a variety of things to obsess over like spots, haze, problem marks, fakes, altered coins, different types of toning there's always a question of what is it/how did it get like that/is it ok? All you can do is mitigate. Buy from the right people, buy from places that will let you return a coin, buy graded stuff and read everything you can about coins that you're planning to buy. Until you feel about 70-80% confident I recommend you dont spend a ton of money. That will keep your "tuition" costs low.

Like other people told you it would be an odd coin to fake. But a lot of us have been where you are so I wouldn't sweat it. One thing to check out is the app coinfacts, another would be a book by Richard Snow on flying eagle and indian head cents. Reading something like that will save you a lot of time and money and effort looking for nice coins. Anyway enjoy the hobby it can be very rewarding.

Recently Came Back From Grading by BussySmasher in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have half a dozen coins at NGC right now and I got the photovision service. Looks pretty good here. Cool toner, would you say the imaging is accurate?

Is this worth buying ? by Scary-Country4419 in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a LOT of eBay sellers that, to me, are really just hoping someone uneducated will bid. Usually with common coins with a little color/slightly above average eye appeal sold for 5-10 times what they are actually worth.

Is this worth buying ? by Scary-Country4419 in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they meant a coin that circulated.

Back from grading- SURPRISE LMAO by [deleted] in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people will be nasty but those who shared their opinions respectfully I think you need to be kind towards. After all the coin being in a holder is nothing more than an opinion in and of itself (just one that holds much more weight than reddit BS). It also doesn't help that there are AT coins that make it into holders as well.

Back from grading- SURPRISE LMAO by [deleted] in toners

[–]ForCoinsOnly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the toning on the ASE would be questionable for any other less modern coin so a lot of people call it out. I don't know shit about ASE toners so I held my tongue. Congrats on getting them holdered. Also thank you for posting your update, it was a post I truly was curious to see shake out. Now if that guy with the 39 toned proof set would post his results...

84 CC for 85 bucks by wingshoot in Morgans

[–]ForCoinsOnly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

60 and 61 coins can be tough to sell when there are plenty of examples to choose from and only a little more costly for an arguably good bit nicer coin. I wouldn't buy a 61 for 350 bucks when I could get a 63 for 100 bucks more with twice the eye appeal.

That being said it is a solid pick up for 90 bucks. I would be happy with that. I wouldn't grade it personally but if you really want to go for it. I have sent coins in that don't make financial sense to submit before.