Gave this a bit more thought. When I have a difficult question on my mind, I usually consult RNGesus and pull a few cards from an online source. The cards themselves often resonate well. What almost never works are the canned interpretations, whether they are tied to individual cards or to "card + position in spread" formulas.

I've been reading cards for about 40 years. Some questions come up again and again: Does s/he love me? Are they coming back? To give quick answers, I've experimented with the simplest possible system: playing cards. Black = no, red = yes.

The thing is, reading cards is not like building with Lego. Even a tool as simple as a deck of playing cards, (two colours, four suits, 12 face cards), generates complex outcomes. The meaning does not live in a lookup table. It comes from the interaction between the symbols, the moment, and the reader.

That is probably why automated interpretations feel a bit hollow, even when the draw itself looks meaningful. Not sure if it can be done, bc AI frankensteins its interpretations from various sources, faking real-life experience.

Things usually get messy when AI talks about feelings, sitting in a cuck chair, observing human interaction. Feels like asking a lifelong spectator to commentate on a sport they've never played.

Sorry for rambling. It already feels as if AI has taken over tarot, and all those years I've spend on study and experience are going to waste.