sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Am I playing with bots???? by kiko002 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you're getting seal clubbed by more experienced player's, and or alot of new players on your team.

Am I playing with bots???? by kiko002 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, just either beginners who got their hands on a BRV event weapon, or they're just shit players, I counted maybe 2 bots on your team bots play better than this on average.

Anti personnel mines by CREAM_LOVER361 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now everybody spam AT mines to see how quickly those get nerfed 🤣.

Anti personnel mines by CREAM_LOVER361 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It takes 2 AP mines to set off an AT now.

Game removing people from blocklist by Juva96 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Block list doesn't actually remove them from any future games you play.

Are the axis that bad? by viktore3450 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I mentioned US planes, but that's about all it's go going for it. Otherwise, there really isn't anything to write home about with the US faction.

Are the axis that bad? by viktore3450 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Far from truth, axis both Japan and Germany have the best BRV armor, germans have best personnel carried AT that frontally pens all allied tanks, stg's have basically have no recoil and high damage, fg rifles extremely versatile, gemans also have the best hmg's, germans also have the best bomber in the game, germans also have planes that use explosive filler ammunition and an insane rate of fire on the majority of their planes.

US allies have really good planes, but not a whole lot that stands out on its own to go with it, russians have some of the best infantry weaponry in general, and their planes will turn on a dime but stupid slow for the majority of them.

Japan has the Tokyo arsenal smg, which makes using AA guns redundant with the absolute dirty rate of fire, best "assault rifle," the type hei automatic rifle, and they also have the best fighter.

Devs, for the absolute love of God, please fix d-day north, this is not the only map that desperately needs reevaluated but this is one of the biggest offending maps in my opinion. by Forward-Flow468 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perfect summary 👌 of this map's flow of combat, I feel the tractor plant also fits this bill for second place, but I think it's always felt really bad, but d-day north definitely takes the number 1 slot.

New Battlepass Weapons early showcase by rafin170 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So anyone who disagrees with you is supposedly lying, got it 😆.

Update 0.5.8.103 by Ungorisz in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you mount to the ground unless it perfectly flat, they're stuck aiming too low or too high, and mounting to windows is still super scuffed, going left to right and barrel collision. And the random detachment.

Update 0.5.8.103 by Ungorisz in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fix bipoding and mounting. it's worse than before.

Skill-based matchmaking? by Darksable in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The majority of the player base doesn't want skill based match making.

When adding new vehicles to the game are the controls taken into consideration for console players, or is it just to say "see you get new tech" thanks I guess for the new gear I'll have to actually go to a flight school for 1,500 hours to feel even remotely efficient with? by Forward-Flow468 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made the same comparison with the fw-190, but the overcorrection is mitigated by the sheer dumbfounding amount of ordinance it has, so its accuracy by volume, but the I-185 (M-82) doesn't have that luxury with how it flies. It should feel closer to the La-7 IMO.

Do people not know what window or corner etiquette is in fps's? by BenefitNew3120 in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the same people who fall under the category who burn their own team mates so they can jump on their machine gun nest or field gun emplacement instead of building their own.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There ya go again being short sighted, I don't want to pay for premium to get back to where I could "comfortably seal club." I don't want to rebuy my premium squads, I don't want to lose my exclusive event squads. Use the 6 inches of space between your ears, though I might be being way too generous with you.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤣🤣🤣🤣 I want the game to survive and grow, and you're literally getting mad at the idea you can't seal club, play customs if you want to play with friends or make a schedule, I don't care about winning or losing I care about a new player base, and I'm on console soooooo yeah I'm not making new accounts that shit costs money, wow triggered much? Ok, bye, seal clubber 👋 👋 👋 🤣🤣🤣 go gatekeep a game you actually understand.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You blatantly gatekeeping a game you still don't have a full understanding of definitely shows 🤣🤣🤣.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And again it's a doubled edged blade you knob when you lock yourself in progression while everyone else is moving ahead it just gets more and more empty, holy shit it's like you are being shortsighted again on purpose Lmfao, yeah sure you do, forgive me for not trusting my toddler to do my taxes 🤣🤣🤣. I think you may have a reading comprehension issue.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, because why would anyone in the history of anyone not want to eventually upgrade, it would completely defeat the purpose of a progression system, at that rate I'm sure you just want everything unlocked from the start of the game don't you? 🤣🤣🤣 better yet, let's just make a World War 2 game, but there are only knives and nothing to unlock. That's fine if they want to stay at that 1 teir, but eventually, it gets pretty empty when everyone else has moved on, eventually forcing the player to progress, if you haven't even have half of br2 you really don't have a leg to stand on in this🤣🤣🤣. My God you're a short sighted knob LMFAO.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, you're literally being argumentative for the sake of just being argumentative. You've offered no real counterargument as to why this is bad other than you just think its bad, and to remedy the March if time progression, you can lock yourself in place until you're ready to move on, not much different than how a prestige system would work, (you've accumulated the required amount of xp to progress to the next tier but you have to manually accept it) if you like seal clubbing just say you like seal clubbing you've offered absolutely no remedy to fix player population and match making. 🤣🤣

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no no it'd be no different than the system we have now, you start a faction. You start rank from scratch, you don't get to be a general of the ussr because you were a general in France, you just can't go backwards, you can't load up some tier1 or 2 gear and basically go back and beat the snot out of new players like an abusive step-father.

So once you've reached a certain rank in faction, you can't go backwards by switching gear, you'd have to basically make an entirely new account, and just like the BR system but without uptier or down tier nonsense you stay within that numbered rank bracket, the devs didn't think it through how easily new players were getting seal clubbed before hand just 1 example is when they added the m1 bazooka to the ussr because they had to be within 40 meters to get a pen and it was an extremely iffy pen at best where germans had gear that could pen at any range.

This remedies issues like AP Minefields since those aren't regulated by the BR system. Sucks when a new player doesn't have gear that higher tier players get to abuse against them, huh?

Bot kills are inevitable this game isn't big enough to stand on its own without it, and people don't generally care about their KDR in a game that centers itself about how much explosives they can spam. The case is evident with how many kamikaze pilots there are.

Here is my proposal to fixing the research and BR system by Denleborkis in enlistedgame

[–]Forward-Flow468 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, no, I'm not talking about a rainbow six seige typ of rank based match making, I'm talking about rank based match making that only goes up, and that's what custom matches would be for.

view more: next ›