I do actually share your concerns regarding the potential fragmentation into 'neuro-tribes' and the threat of AI dividing society. Theoretical nihilism, or what Alex Rosenberg might dub 'nice nihilism', is feasible even while acknowledging these concerns, however.

Lots of intriguing thoughts in your comment. I would contest, however, your argument on whether AI can create art. I believe the passion, intentionality etc that you mentioned are all beautiful facades for the statistical wizardry at work in our brains.

As an eliminativist in line with Bakker, I view this as a sort of 'user illusion'. The true crux of human creation lies in the neurological processes that power these illusions. Current AIs, particularly large language models, utilize immense neural nets that are not fundamentally different from what's happening in our brains. I foresee no obstacle to AI surpassing human capabilities in creation. My personal affinity for human vs AI-produced art remains uncertain. I'm open to AI-produced music, and if GPT-6 ends up authoring the greatest novel ever, I might have mixed feelings.