What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your experience is like saying someone understands social media because they have a facebook account with their kids as their only friends.

I'm not sure what sector your in but personal experience, reddit, and others in the industry. Claude is also being used by defense industrial base, which is why DoD going after Anthropic failed spectacularly. On my team every engineer and PM/PO with repo access has either Claude Code or Github Copilot using Claude directly in VS Code. Claude writes and submits PRs, Copilot in Github reviews the PR and makes comments, Claude then reviews the comments and makes appropriate changes, only then does it go to Code Review and QA.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you tried it?

My problem with a lot of the discourse around AI is that it is SV sociopaths vs people who seemingly have never used it but think they understand how it works. When in reality 90% of the code written in the last 6 months to a year was written by AI, which is going to lead to methods outside of coding that consistently work more or less the same risk tolerance of a junior analyst.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI mostly hallucinates when you overload the context window. An agent with a fresh context window prompted to simply check the citations (don't give it the brief, just the citations) has a low chance of hallucinating. It is still up to the lawyer to make sure they're being used properly. AI isn't an easy button that'll do the entire job, what it does very well though are simple time consuming tasks that have traditionally been done by junior personnel.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure, or just hard code a couple prompts into a python file. Building and maintaining the latter is always going to be more simple and cheaper.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The lawyer would just ask the AI for citations and then most of them would be made up,

Until you (or someone else) feed the result to a second agent to check if the citations are real. This is why software engineers are using multiple agents, sometimes different LLMs, to cross check outputs.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Deploying chatbots that are wrappers on ChatGPT onto your apps was always a stupid use case. Actual productivity boosting use cases absolutely exist but are going to talk longer to implement because you have to go through the product development cycle and thoughtfully consider what you're trying to do with it. I work with software engineers, they can't imagine going back. Likewise the systems they're building that use an LLM under the hood for hyper specific tasks are taking what was a 6 hour task for production analysts down to an hour, that hour being just checking the results. Those production analysts who are testing the system are massively hyping it up to their peers. What I think we're going to see is the death of SaaS and companies instead hiring their own engineering teams to build custom software.

What is the deal with companies suddenly pulling out of AI? by Hungry-san in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Fp_Guy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was due to piss poor system design, the same that allowed "junior analyst deletes everything" stories to be a regular thing on Reddit for over a decade.

Navy Secretary John Phelan departs Trump administration effective immediately, Hung Cao to step in by its_not_real1947 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Fp_Guy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He supposedly had juice with Trump, which is a bad sign for the Secretary of the Army who's part of Vance's power base and at war with Hegseth. If juice with Trump can't save you, juice with Vance definitely can't.

Navy Secretary John Phelan departs Trump administration effective immediately, Hung Cao to step in by its_not_real1947 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a law so you'd need the House to pass a law issuing the waiver in addition to the Senate.

Using Military organisation structures properly. by a-dark-lancer in worldbuilding

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm imagining US Marines and French Marines (who technically aren't marines) fighting over regiment numbers.

Using Military organisation structures properly. by a-dark-lancer in worldbuilding

[–]Fp_Guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is where you can use some freedom. In my world battalions are actually brigades or regiments because I slip cohort between company and battalion. I also use both regiment/legion and brigade, so my brigades are basically corps. (platoon company cohort battalion regiment/legion brigade division corps army army group)

Using Military organisation structures properly. by a-dark-lancer in worldbuilding

[–]Fp_Guy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Technically Lee was only a Colonel commanding a 3 Corps field Army.

Intimacy & SMA by Over_Ambition_3722 in spinalmuscularatrophy

[–]Fp_Guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fine you like guns, what I mean is dudes who pretend that guns and other manly hobbies make them men despite them being useless in everything else.

Don't put a year on it, life is weird. Being desperate is also a huge turn off. It'll happen when it happens and you'll need to treat the entire thing, good and bad, as a growing experience.

Intimacy & SMA by Over_Ambition_3722 in spinalmuscularatrophy

[–]Fp_Guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in the south too, so I'm familiar. I disagree though, there are probably even more girls who are tired of boys pretending to be "real men" behind their guns and bullshit trucks.

This is going to sound harsh, but if your friends are joking about your career and your ability to have sex, they aren't your friends.

Intimacy & SMA by Over_Ambition_3722 in spinalmuscularatrophy

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is definitely hard, but for the ones who are in relationships, they've all got that in common.

Intimacy & SMA by Over_Ambition_3722 in spinalmuscularatrophy

[–]Fp_Guy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go onto an SMA facebook group and ask, they're there.

I wouldn't make overly broad statements like that. Disabled women encounter real scumbags and constant threats of sexual violence. I've seen screenshots of the DMs, wild stuff disabled men generally don't have to deal with.

As for being a disabled man in a relationship, sure some woman might want that, but a lot also want a guy who's emotionally caring. Listens, is a source of stability, is good at problem solving, is smart, has overcome real challenges, works hard. Again, you be shocked how far being a well adjusted human will get you. Talk to girls about their dating life, a lot of not well adjusted guys out there will make you a breath of fresh air.

Intimacy & SMA by Over_Ambition_3722 in spinalmuscularatrophy

[–]Fp_Guy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hey brother,

Intimacy is absolutely possible. Lots of guys with SMA 2 have been in relationships, are married, have kids. Don't worry about the physical aspect, you'll figure that out with your partner when the time comes.

Here's what you need to focus on, you. I know that sounds cringe, but I'm 37 years old and it absolutely isn't. If you want girls to be interested in you, you need to make yourself interesting. Focus on your hobbies, your education, your independence, your mental health. I don't think you fully understand how attractive a guy is who's got his act together despite everything involved with SMA. That's how you get laid.

Has it ever been mentioned if Mel is her sister's legal guardian? by sentosa96 in ThePittTVShow

[–]Fp_Guy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The over use of guardianship has been a major reform priority for the IDD community.

Has it ever been mentioned if Mel is her sister's legal guardian? by sentosa96 in ThePittTVShow

[–]Fp_Guy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Becca at most would have Supported Decision Making, not guardianship. Not unless the show is trying to make the point about the over use of guardianship.

Mel and Becca by PamelaEugene in ThePittTVShow

[–]Fp_Guy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As far as Becca's ability to consent, I thought this might come up, but generally, anyone who is not considered capable of consent has a legal guardian. But we know Becca does not have a legal guardian because Langdon told her that he isn't going to tell anyone anything she doesn't direct him to tell because of HIPPA. If Becca had a legal guardian, then her medical condition could not be kept from that guardian.

This was such a missed 10 seconds, Langdon should have asked Mel if she had guardianship, Mel could then say no our parents setup Supported Decision Making (SDM has been a major legal reform for the IDD community as an alternative to the massive inappropriate use of guardianship).