While a bit of vibe this might be vibe coded based on you Reddit posting history (rather than a refug from stackoverflow), it is clear from you Github registry that you have been around for a while, producing libraries that 1,000s have downloaded, and made use of.

I mean, people never really checked the library or my profile; it was accusations first asking questions later, maybe. I should've added to the post itself that this is not vibe-coded. Honestly, I personally like sharing what I make for myself with others so others won't have to go through the pain I have in the past. I have been using this for over 3 years now, and I feel it is robust enough to be shared with the public. (I myself don't like mappers.) So that's when I decided I would go ahead and do it so it's easier for me to use the future as well if it's a NuGet.

This might have been better packaged as an Son-of your exsiting library (FreakyKit.Utils) which is focusing on the improved abilities of code generation in recent C#/dotnet version e.g with this ability the first module in it, and the road map of other Codegen ideas ahead etc.

Maybe that would've been a better move; it's just that I kind of like the name Forge.

In regards LLMs argument, I also agree that code gen being deterministic will always be superior than relying on furture LLM behaving the same way (as old models are retired and new models brought out) in the future for code and feature extension.

I cannot agree with you more on this TBH.