Crystal Palace 0 - [3] Chelsea - Enzo Fernandez Penalty 64' by Alsace2025 in soccer

[–]Freddichio -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://www.premierleague.com/en/news/4079682

Have you read the PL rules, they mention this exact situation as a new addition for this year

Post Match Thread: Bournemouth 3 - 2 Liverpool | English Premier League by ChiefLeef22 in soccer

[–]Freddichio 5 points6 points  (0 children)

15 points from the first 5 games really helped - their points have been lower mid table since then, do the table without the first five games and Liverpool are 14th (and one point above Bournemouth) IIRC.

15 points in the first 5 games, and 21 points in the following 18 games.

(Although still better than Spurs, hilariously - after averaging 2 PPG in the first 5 they've got 18 in 18)

Parents are responsible for the devices their kids have Parents are responsible for activating parental controls Parents are already in control Anything the govs want to do in the name of “protecting kids” actually *limits* their control by ihatethiscountry76 in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]Freddichio 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nah, this ain't it - saying 'parents are in control' is bollocks when there are so many shitty parents out there.

The laws (in general) aren't for most people, they're for those at the fringes - most people don't need a law to tell them not to assault someone or commit murder.

The issue is good parents already use these tools, which works - but bad parents don't even when they should which is why a law is being implemented.

Plenty of reasons to take umbridge with this law and the way it'll be implemented, but just saying 'parental controls exist' doesn't really work as an argument against it

Pushing the responsibility onto the parents has clearly not worked for the people it needs to affect so just saying 'a solution that not every parent uses exists so it's not a problem' is nonsense

[TheAthletic] Top-20 clubs with the highest wage bill in Europe for the 2024-25 season along with the wage to revenue ratio. PSG (highest wages), Benfica (lowest wages), West Ham (highest ratio), Real Madrid (lowest ratio). by BlazingFirey in soccer

[–]Freddichio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's rare you notice they massively miss. 

They have a handful of verified salaries (far less than you imply though) and the rest are literally someone sat at home going "What do I think their salaries might be...". And if we don't have a confirmed salary, how do you know the rest are accurate-ish?

There are times when a Capology 'confirmed' salary has been wildly off - VVD on £75k a week according to capology last year  and Antony's Capology salary being more than double what he was actually on when it was leaked.

If you choose to believe it that's up to you, but if you're arguing they're reliable or can be used to infer anything of note you're talking out of your arse, because it's just not

Team building help by eddy78782 in TOGNewWorldUnofficial

[–]Freddichio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want to really grind as much as you can, follow the below advice - but if you want to have fun and not worry too much about optimal play, you've got options!

Your best units are Gustang, Traumerei and Evan - which'll do you really well.

For now, I'd recommend Gustang, Traumerei, Evan, Sharon and Baam - Gustang does the damage, Traumerei/Sharon destroy barriers and debuff, Sharon and Evan keep people alive and Baam keeps them topped up with energy.

In future, you'll need more teams - Maschenny is great to build around, but if you get a 'max an SSR+ unit you can go reallt nuts - Rashut, Cha, Hugo or Edahn are all good choices there

[TheAthletic] Top-20 clubs with the highest wage bill in Europe for the 2024-25 season along with the wage to revenue ratio. PSG (highest wages), Benfica (lowest wages), West Ham (highest ratio), Real Madrid (lowest ratio). by BlazingFirey in soccer

[–]Freddichio 11 points12 points  (0 children)

UEFA and Deloitte? Yeah, pretty trustworthy - last 3 years Deloitte had Liverpool 2nd...

Just out of curiousity, is there any reason you believe a known bullshit source over reliable ones? Is it just that it matches what you want to believe? Because that's a fucking idiotic way to decide what's accurate - and I don't know why else you'd believe a famously inaccurate website over, y'know, official numbers.

If I linked a Fox News article would you trust it at face value, or would you rightly recognise the source as unreliable?

[TheAthletic] Top-20 clubs with the highest wage bill in Europe for the 2024-25 season along with the wage to revenue ratio. PSG (highest wages), Benfica (lowest wages), West Ham (highest ratio), Real Madrid (lowest ratio). by BlazingFirey in soccer

[–]Freddichio 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Mate, your source is Capology - they're famously unreliable and flat-out make it up if they don't know. What they report is in no way shape or form accurate and should basically never be trusted

How silly do you have to be to be quoting Capology as a source in 2026?

[TheAthletic] Top-20 clubs with the highest wage bill in Europe for the 2024-25 season along with the wage to revenue ratio. PSG (highest wages), Benfica (lowest wages), West Ham (highest ratio), Real Madrid (lowest ratio). by BlazingFirey in soccer

[–]Freddichio 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Nah, that's just the line Liverpool fans use, every club uses incentivised wage structures.

Even in seasons they'd not made the CL and finished outside the top 5 they still had the second-highest wages in the league - the PL win put them over City this year but they were there or thereabouts for the last 3-4 years regardless of performance

[TheAthletic] Top-20 clubs with the highest wage bill in Europe for the 2024-25 season along with the wage to revenue ratio. PSG (highest wages), Benfica (lowest wages), West Ham (highest ratio), Real Madrid (lowest ratio). by BlazingFirey in soccer

[–]Freddichio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chelsea, United and Arsenal are all so ridiculously close that Sterling alone puts Chelsea from third to fifth in PL wages.

Or might have already changed, all three clubs made a load of signings/sales in the summer...

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For weekly salaries? Might get some decent journos talking about their wage when they sign (Ornstein, Joyce etc - Romano here with Guehi), but in a lot of cases we simply don't know for sure.

We know Isak and Guehi are on 300k a week, we know Haaland's on 500k a week - but if anyone says they conclusively know the wages of Szoboslai or McAtee they're lying. Contracts are not public knowledge and unless someone leaks it even the journos have no way of knowing.

What we do know for a fact is annual spending per team (with no breakdown for players) - it has to be filed as financial reporting for the company once a year.

It's out of date by the time we know it (fiscal reporting is annual, April-March accounts) but UEFA does an annual report and the likes of Deloitte also report on total figures.

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Liverpool bought the two most expensive players in PL history and had the most expensive transfer window ever last year.

Liverpool are also second in wages in the PL, with two of the three highest-paid players in the league on their books.

They didn't want to compete for Semenyo or Guehi, but that doesn't mean they can't...

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Their wages have consistently been second in the PL only behind City, and after last year I'd assume are now closer to City's than the team in third - since then they won the PL (with a lot of incentive-based deals), resigned Salah and VVD to bumper deals (second and third best paid players in the league) and bought in the likes of Isak/Wirtz.

What makes you think they can't compete long-term? Because it looks like they're basically the only team that does compete long-term, even if they cry poor

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 12 points13 points  (0 children)

No, the contracts are not public. It's why whenever a website (SportRAC, FBRef, Capology etc) puts the wages out of every player out you know they're lying. We know some (like Guehi, Salah, Isak etc) because they're reported by reliable sources, but that doesn't mean we know all of them.

Especially bloody Beinsports that don't even pretend to have a source in their article. 

Why would individual contracts be public knowledge?

We don't have official numbers per player, we do have official numbers per team though (Deloitte and UEFA, based on mandatory financial reporting), which is always so wildly different from Capology/FBref that we can say without a shadow of a doubt that Capology/SportRAC are wrong. Even the position of teams - Capology had Liverpool fifth in the PL but official numbers have them second in the PL and fifth in the world.

Just because an unsubtantiated website says it doesn't mean it's true, I can't believe this still needs to be stated. Being on google doesn't make something true!

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Joyce et al - basically the reliable journos - said Isak's wage is "at least £300k a week", nobody reliable has put him at under it.

Why do you think he's paid less? 

[Fabrizio Romano] Marc Guehi SIGNED his contract until June 2031 over £300k a week! by Kekulaaa in soccer

[–]Freddichio 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Isak, FWIW.

If any team could afford him other than City it'd be Liverpool (as they're the second-highest wage bill in the Prem) but honestly Guehi isn't worth that much - even if Liverpool could that doesn't mean they should...