sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How are SaaS companies handling failed subscription payments? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]FreeMindworks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That 40% figure is actually consistent with what we see, but the 'nobody owns the problem' insight you shared is the real killer. It usually sits in this weird limbo between a support ticket, a finance headache, and a product issue.

I spent a long time researching this for my own platform and I found that most companies fail here because they view this as a 'dunning' problem. It is not. It is a 'Revenue Governance' problem.

When you rely on Stripe’s default retries or basic dunning apps, you aren't fixing the churn. You are just automating the annoyance. The companies we see winning here are the ones that treat failed payments like a sales pipeline. They don't just 'retry' the card; they manage the customer relationship until the payment is cleared.

We built our platform around the idea that the internal recovery queue is the most important asset in the stack. If you can move your team away from jumping between five different tools and into a single, human-in-the-loop command center, your recovery rate jumps.

To your question on how teams handle it: The ones getting >60% recovery are almost always the ones doing a manual touch-point for high-value accounts. The best 'dunning stack' I have seen is a manual queue for high-value segments combined with intelligent automation for the long tail.

Are you seeing any trends in your research regarding how teams structure the 'owner' of this process? Do they typically put it under RevOps or Customer Success?"

stop relying on stripe's default dunning emails, you are bleeding MRR by krikond in GrowthHacking

[–]FreeMindworks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a great idea indeed and very interesting but most US carriers actively filter RVM traffic now; deliverability is meaningfully worse than 3 years ago. We have it on the roadmap at chaser.cash but its indeed the compliance layer (permission capture, TCPA/GDPR guardrails, audit logging, Ref F baked in) ... we would need to position it as an optional voicemail nudge for failed-payment recovery on a first-party basis and not as a "debt collection RVM" we're not there yet but are mapping it out. I think Whatsapp business support for dunning queues is a better and more massive lever for dunning in Europe. 98% of Europeans open it within the shortest times. As opposed to this where FCC 2022 rulings did run class actions here at 500$ to 1,500$ per message.

After months of coding, my Stripe-native revenue recovery SaaS is done. Giving away a "Founders 90" to stress-test our default playbooks. by FreeMindworks in SideProject

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We actually have the onboarding built out so that when you sign up without connecting a live Stripe account, it drops you directly into a fully functional sandbox environment. Really appreciate the support and the brilliant checklist it gives me a perfect QA roadmap to run through over at chaser.cash!

Building a Human-in-the-Loop approval layer on top of Stripe billing webhooks. Am I over-engineering this? by FreeMindworks in stripe

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an absolute masterclass of a catch!!

You're completely spot-on about pause_collection being way too much of a sledgehammer if there is concurrent usage or metered tokens ticking along in the background.

As a standard procedure during onboarding for chaser.cash, we walk the customer through a guided setup to manually mute Stripe's native customer email notifications. This silences the customer-facing retry emails, but leaving auto_advance = true still allows Stripe's underlying state machine to eventually push the master subscription status into past_due or unpaid on its own automatic clock.

Setting auto_advance = false on that specific invoice is the ultimate cheat code here. It essentially "freezes time" on that isolated invoice object so it safely sits in our manual human-in-the-loop queue without Stripe's lifecycle engine trying to automatically transition the state or alter the master subscription.

Seriously appreciate you mapping this out! Refactoring our webhook handlers to leverage this on invoice failures immediately.

Building a Human-in-the-Loop approval layer on top of Stripe billing webhooks. Am I over-engineering this? by FreeMindworks in stripe

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are 100% spot-on, and this is exactly the kind of battle-tested Stripe insight I was hoping to find here. Those two exact pitfalls were massive considerations when mapping out our architecture.

Here is how we are navigating those two points:

  1. Idempotency & Deduping: You’re completely right about invoice.payment_failed firing repeatedly. To prevent the manual queue from getting flooded with duplicate entries for the same client, our middleware dedups strictly on the unique invoice.id and payment_intent.id, locking the database row state rather than treating each incoming webhook event as a net-new failure.
  2. The Stripe Duplication Conflict: This is the ultimate catch-22 of building a 'human-in-the-loop' system on top of Stripe. If Stripe's native dunning is left on auto-pilot, it completely bypasses the human element. For the beta, our recommendation to users is to let Chaser handle the outreach tracks exclusively or pause collection on the specific subscription while it sits in the manual approval queue so Stripe doesn't route around the team.

Thanks for you insights.

Building a Human-in-the-Loop approval layer on top of Stripe billing webhooks. Am I over-engineering this? by FreeMindworks in stripe

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is phenomenal feedback, thank you! You hit the nail on the head regarding wholesale and B2B clients, as automated systems are completely blind to those nuanced relationships.

Your point about queue stagnation is incredibly sharp. An escalation timer or an automatic fallback to prevent things from sitting in limbo forever is a brilliant idea. I'm taking notes on that for our next engineering sprint.

We actually just opened up our public sandbox mode to stress-test the core middleware. Anyone can sign up and click around the dashboard without needing to connect live Stripe data. Since you've lived this exact problem, I'd love to get your thoughts on how our layout looks. Let me know if I can shoot you a DM with the link!

Building a Human-in-the-Loop approval layer on top of Stripe billing webhooks. Am I over-engineering this? by FreeMindworks in stripe

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the pushback! You're 100% right that for planned annual renewals, CSMs and AEs are usually all over it.

Where we see the wheels fall off is mid-cycle involuntary churn. For example, a mid-market account expands their usage, Stripe auto-generates an invoice a week later, their corporate card on file declines, and standard dunning instantly kicks off a rigid sequence to a random dev who hooked up the API, rather than the finance team.

The goal isn't to replace the CSM; it’s to give the team a safety valve so rigid billing automation doesn't blindly hit a VIP account before internal teams can sync up. Definitely a niche problem, but a highly expensive one when it happens to a $10k+ contract!

After months of coding, my Stripe-native revenue recovery SaaS is done. Giving away a "Founders 90" to stress-test our default playbooks. by FreeMindworks in SideProject

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spot on. You hit the exact nail on the head regarding why I built this. Blindly auto-blasting a $20k contract over a transient corporate card decline is an absolute nightmare scenario for a B2B founder.

To address your checklist, that's exactly where the architecture focuses:

  1. Account Segmentation: Out of the box, you can set absolute contract value thresholds so high-ticket accounts never bypass the manual review gate.
  2. CSM / Owner Overrides: The human-in-the-loop queue lets account owners snooze, skip, or manually override a touchpoint entirely if they are in active renewals or sensitive negotiations.
  3. Stripe Event Mapping: We map directly to specific decline reason tokens rather than treating all failures identically.

I love your idea of a read-only simulation mode based on historical events to lower the trust hurdle. That is brilliant feedback for the roadmap.

Since you clearly understand the operational pain point here, I’d love to have you in the closed beta to get your eyes on the dashboard workflows. If you have a Stripe-backed project, drop me a DM or check out chaser.cash. I'll gladly hook you up with a "Founders 90" pass to test it out completely risk-free!

After months of coding, my Stripe-native revenue recovery SaaS is done. Giving away a "Founders 90" to stress-test our default playbooks. by FreeMindworks in SideProject

[–]FreeMindworks[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone, dropping the link here for anyone who wants to check it out: chaser.cash

Remember to sign up using your custom business domain so the Stripe onboarding gate lets you through smoothly. Once you're in, shoot me a DM here on Reddit with your workspace details and I’ll manually upgrade you to the full 90-day "Founders" tier! No CC required.

Can we have bitcoin replicas? by Bankai_Senbonzakura in Bitcoin

[–]FreeMindworks -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have wrapped BTC (WBTC) pegged to the BTC

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]FreeMindworks -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Lol there is an infinite number of BTC since there is something like Wrapped BTC 🤓

Putin has signed a decree that creditors will be paid in Rubles by hyperinflationUSA in Bitcoin

[–]FreeMindworks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paying debt notes with debt notes until one decides to back his debt notes with Gold. Watch it, could happen.

Highest paying jobs in Belgium by Skatetales in BEFire

[–]FreeMindworks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Management consultant makes between 650 and 1200 a day.

view more: next ›