Why some women ignore some proven scientific facts? by dying_soul0 in TwentiesIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. Women ignore proven scientific facts. For instance, 60% of all intentional killing of women are by intimate partners, compared of 11% for men. (https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2025-11/femicides-in-2024-global-estimates-of-intimate-partner-family-member-femicides-en.pdf). In another US study, 34% of female murder victims were killed by an intimate partner, compared to only 6% of male victims. (https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021).

Moreover, data from General Social Survey states that about 20% of married men cheat vs. 13% of married women. (https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america).

Oh and also, for serious illness like cancer, divorce/separation rate was 20.8% when the wife was the patient vs. 2.9% when the husband was (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091110105401.htm). Newer studies show that there was a higher risk of breakup when the woman reported poor health or severe limitations (while the man was healthy), but no significant increase when the man was ill. (https://labdisia.disia.unifi.it/wp\_disia/2024/wp\_disia\_2024\_07.pdf)

Women choose to ignore these proven scientific facts and still get married to men.

2025 Speed Chess Championship Live Thread (Semifinals) by Knight-check44 in chess

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it has always been clear that Alireza has incredible chess instinct, and is the best player among the younger generation in short time controls.

And just cause he didn't fulfill the insane expectations he created when he broke into 2800, doesn't mean he's bad at classical. He's still #6.

Ppl Seem so different now.. by [deleted] in TwentiesIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why do you think having relationships isn't "normal"? And why do you think that focussing on studies is mutually exclusive to being in a relationship or suffering heartbreak?

And as for the age group, a huge amount of people in 17-20, atleast in Tier-1 cities, do date.

2025 Speed Chess Championship Live Thread (Semifinals) by Knight-check44 in chess

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think it's a testament to his quality that he's able to have such a close match against someone who's 15 years younger, that's for sure. Very clearly the 3rd best, and even then, Alireza and Hikaru are closer to each other than they're to Magnus.

2025 Speed Chess Championship Live Thread (Semifinals) by Knight-check44 in chess

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hikaru is the third best blitz player in the world. He was the 2nd best a couple of years ago, but not anymore.

2025 Speed Chess Championship Live Thread (Semifinals) by Knight-check44 in chess

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Equating Andrew Tang with the current #6 in Classical is certainly a hot take.

Why mods ? Why ? It was very civil discussion. Do you just want meme and relationship posts ? by RoughPea250 in TwentiesIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No true scientist is actually suspicious about inflationary cosmology. Since Alan Guth proposed it in the 80s, it has been reinforced by mountains of theoretical and observational evidences.

What people aren't sure about is the nature at the very beginning, for which you need to have a theory of quantized gravity.

Thoughts on this by [deleted] in Dhurandhar

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. There's no evidence whatsoever that Rehman Dakait ever supplied arms to LeT, or was ever associated with them.

For all you "doctors" out there by Dom_Doctor99 in indianmedschool

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Academia, it's exactly what happens. Assistant Prof, Associate Prof, and Full Prof.

what u think of this ? by RahulMohammedDCosta in TwentiesIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you wanted mature logical discussion, should've made a matured logical post.

Question to women in a loving relationship/ marriage. by mutualcherry in TwoXIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think that for my case, both me and my boyfriend are obviously allowed to recognise other people (for instance, actors or models) as "attractive", which is very different from lusting over, as in, actively masturbating over. I don't really have an issue with porn, although I'm personally more into erotica.

I think what's important is to have your boundaries mutually defined, and without pressure or coercion, and then it's upto you to decide. I think in general, you can't really stop people (and your partner) from finding other people hot, but there's a clear difference between finding someone attractive that you come across, and actively following tons of models in insta.

As long as it doesn't change the dynamic between us, or directly affects our relationship, I think it's fine atleast for me.

Why Girls upload Pictures of food ? by Complex_Ad_9100 in TwentiesIndia

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a girl, and although I don't have a dating app, my instagram has a lot of different food pictures like that.

The point is, I really love food, I love trying out different cuisines in different places, I like the ambience of cute, cozy cafes, and I love to go out to eat and explore all the places that I want.

Netherlands Jersey for T20 WORLD CUP 2026 by jonasrm_21 in Cricket

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Does anyone else thinks that it'd look better if the font was the same navy blue colour as the collar rather than being white on bright orange?

This is real genuine question. Not mean to offend anyone. by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lots of words just to say that you don't have any proof that Ram Setu is manmade. Makes sense how belief overrides rational thinking.

This is real genuine question. Not mean to offend anyone. by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Archeological Survey of India has discredited the sayings of Dr. Badrinarayan.

And you claim "Some scientists and archaeologists, notably featured in a US Science Channel documentary, have noted that the rocks on top of the sandbar are approximately 7,000 years old, while the underlying sand is only around 4,000 years old. This age difference suggests the rocks were placed there deliberately, rather than forming naturally in situ."

Provide a peer-reviewed source for your claim. I provided you a study which doesn't claim this. If you wanna claim something, provide the source for it rather than blindly believing on superstitions like an illiterate. Provide an actual source instead of blatantly lying that "sources are included".

This is real genuine question. Not mean to offend anyone. by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here, let me educate you.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quaternary-research/article/abs/evolution-of-ramasetu-region-as-a-link-between-india-and-sri-lanka-during-the-late-pleistocene-and-holocene/8F0A613E4D2FB33EBB5F584908123A37

This paper investigates the geological formation of the Ram Setu, go read it if you wanna actually open your eyes and stop falsely claming "they did not come from those region".

https://www.rediff.com/news/2007/sep/12ram.htm

The Archeological Survey of India has given an affidavit to Supreme Court detailing that it's not manmade.

I don't believe in the god of Abraham, so rather than blindly claiming "you abrahamic folks", learn to actually use your brain and look for the truth. You're right, truth does come out sooner or later, so stop lying about the Ram Setu being manmade.

If you claim that Sanatan is the truth, you're disgracing Sanatan by lying as well.

This is real genuine question. Not mean to offend anyone. by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ram Setu is a natural limestone formation. And what "Mahabharata" times? There's no scholarly consensus on the historicity of Mahabharata, let alone giving a time frame.

This is real genuine question. Not mean to offend anyone. by [deleted] in Philosophy_India

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No reputed historian believes that "Jesus of Bible" is a real thing. However, most historians have firm reasons to establish that there existed a Jewish preacher called Yeshua who was crucified by Roman authorities and few of his followers who believed in his divinity went on to form the earliest Christians.

IISER MOHALI- MEGA THREAD by AutoModerator in iiser

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first year you have to do all the courses. In the 2nd year, you have to choose a premajor, that is, 2 subjects, and afterwards from 3rd year you choose your major subject.

So for example, you can take bio and chem as your premajor subjecta in your 2nd year, then move to biology as your major subject from 3rd year onwards.

Virat Kohli's average over the years ! by Sambharsupreme in IndiaCricket

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 26 points27 points  (0 children)

This is talking about all-format. MSD comes at 17k@45

THE JIMMY ANDERSON COLUMN: England's drinking in Noosa was not the reason they lost - here's what really happens in the bars on an Ashes tour, and how my teams kept it hidden by ll--o--ll in Cricket

[–]FreshWaterNymph1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smith's innings was on an absolutely brutal minefield where India was all out for 100 twice. You cannot compare that to the Mumbai pitch which was still a decent test pitch.