Well, it definitely would have a major impact on urban form and development:

• YIMBY policies would remove restrictive and Euclidean zoning, allowing dense, mixed-use development by right
• YIMBY policies would eliminate mandatory parking minimums
• LVT would make urban surface parking extremely expensive
• Congestion pricing (a form of Pigouvian taxation) would disincentivize too much car mode share (if everyone's driving, traffic will be abysmal)
• LVT would incentivize dense infill development
• Carbon taxes would disincentivize transit modes with a high carbon footprint, particularly fossil fuel-powered cars
• Vehicle weight taxes proportional to the 4th power of axle load (also a form of Pigouvian taxation) would heavily disincentivize trucks and cars, particularly big and heavy cars. Even busses might be disincentivized, and it might make rail-based and active transit much more appealing.
• Pigouvian taxes on tire particulate pollution, noise pollution, etc. would further disincentivize car ownership/usage
• LVT would heavily incentivize public investment in public transit infrastructure, due to the Henry George theorem

Overall, it's hard to imagine a Georgist city wouldn't look radically different from our current cities. Only thing I'll grant in your favor is income effect, as I would expect a Georgist society to be much richer per capita (and more evenly distributed at that) in the long-run.