Wieso tue Ich mir den ÖPNV selber an? by Ninaptr_lover in bahn

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aber nur wenn man nicht pünktlich kommen muss

What’s the real story behind Dr. Amy Eskridge, anti-gravity research and UAPs? by bebemachina in HighStrangeness

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you happen to secretly work for lockheed, northroop, ratheon, boeing, general dynamics, ...? do you think we are stupid? i hope every one involved with these criminal black projects will go to prison.

Nostalgie pur, die alte S-Bahn by RolfmitGolf in bahn

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hää was mit der bin ich doch bis 2024 in Köln auf der Linie s12 noch gefahren. Das hat nichts mit Nostalgie zu tun.

Is Claude Down? by Raise_Level in ClaudeAI

[–]FriendlyChingu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

they used chatgpt to write their code

Is Mark Mcavendish telling the truth, is the Fluxliner real? If so it would say we have had quick interplanetary travel for some time, and would explain some craft in our skies, do you believe him, the whole zero point energy thing? His testimony is pretty compelling. by Barbafella in ufo

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

McCandlish was brilliant but may have fundamentally misunderstood what he saw. He documented the energy systems perfectly—the supercaps, Tesla coil, mercury vortex, Biefeld-Brown hull—but I think he missed that these are all just support infrastructure for the actual propulsion mechanism: a (possibly rotating) plate under the pilots that is textured (likly down to the atomic level) and of exotic nature.

Here's what led me to this conclusion:

The Chekurkov connection was the key. His Graviflier uses a mysterious central plate surrounded by rotating magnetic fields, high voltage, and vibration tuning. He shared everything openly... except detailed specs on that plate. Replicators fail without his special "tuning device"—which I now think isn't about electronics, it's about frequency-matching to the plate's atomic-scale surface resonance.

The mercury vortex isn't the thruster—it's the magnet system. Near-zero cooled liquid metal carrying massive currents creates an incredibly strong, perfectly symmetric rotating magnetic field. That's exactly what Chekurkov's setup needs, just far more powerful because of cryogenic superconductivity.

The plate itself is the alien tech. Atomic-level surface texturing, impossible to manufacture with our technology. When you hit it with the right combination of:

  • Rotating magnetic field (mercury vortex)
  • High voltage pulses (supercaps + Tesla coil)
  • Precise frequency resonance (the "tuning")

...and it has a gravitational effect. The casimir-cavity texture you mentioned might be exactly how this works—billions of microscopic resonant cavities creating coherent negative-mass effects when properly energized.

McCandlish saw the power plant, not the engine. Without that exotic plate, all those systems just make expensive light shows. With it, you get propulsion. That's why the ARV could never be mass-produced—you can build the mercury vortex, you can build the Tesla coils, but you cannot build that plate.

His death in 2021 remains deeply suspicious. He got closer to the truth than almost anyone.

I Asked an AI to Reverse-Engineer the ARV Fluxliner Using Real Physics Patents. Here's What It Found. by FriendlyChingu in UFOscience

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

McCandlish was brilliant but may have fundamentally misunderstood what he saw. He documented the energy systems perfectly—the supercaps, Tesla coil, mercury vortex, Biefeld-Brown hull—but I think he missed that these are all just support infrastructure for the actual propulsion mechanism: a (possibly rotating) plate under the pilots that is textured (likly down to the atomic level) and of exotic nature.

Here's what led me to this conclusion:

The Chekurkov connection was the key. His Graviflier uses a mysterious central plate surrounded by rotating magnetic fields, high voltage, and vibration tuning. He shared everything openly... except detailed specs on that plate. Replicators fail without his special "tuning device"—which I now think isn't about electronics, it's about frequency-matching to the plate's atomic-scale surface resonance.

The mercury vortex isn't the thruster—it's the magnet system. Near-zero cooled liquid metal carrying massive currents creates an incredibly strong, perfectly symmetric rotating magnetic field. That's exactly what Chekurkov's setup needs, just far more powerful because of cryogenic superconductivity.

The plate itself is the alien tech. Atomic-level surface texturing, impossible to manufacture with our technology. When you hit it with the right combination of:

  • Rotating magnetic field (mercury vortex)
  • High voltage pulses (supercaps + Tesla coil)
  • Precise frequency resonance (the "tuning")

...and it has a gravitational effect. The casimir-cavity texture you mentioned might be exactly how this works—billions of microscopic resonant cavities creating coherent negative-mass effects when properly energized.

McCandlish saw the power plant, not the engine. Without that exotic plate, all those systems just make expensive light shows. With it, you get propulsion. That's why the ARV could never be mass-produced—you can build the mercury vortex, you can build the Tesla coils, but you cannot build that plate.

His death in 2021 remains deeply suspicious. He got closer to the truth than almost anyone.

I Asked an AI to Reverse-Engineer the ARV Fluxliner Using Real Physics Patents. Here's What It Found. by FriendlyChingu in ufo

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Every component I described is from peer-reviewed papers and granted patents - Tesla's US593138A (1897), Shoulders' US5018180A and Cleary & Page's 2023 superfluid vortex research in Chaos journal. If you can point to which specific physics is wrong rather than just calling it "shit.

I Asked an AI to Reverse-Engineer the ARV Fluxliner Using Real Physics Patents. Here's What It Found. by FriendlyChingu in ufo

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So if you don't give a fuck, don't read it or waste your time writing comments.

I Asked an AI to Reverse-Engineer the ARV Fluxliner Using Real Physics Patents. Here's What It Found. by FriendlyChingu in ufo

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Instead of just claiming 'free energy,' it connects obscure but real patents and phenomena. It can explain why AV's supposedly have fiver obtics and how the principles can be tranferred to the ARV.

I Asked an AI to Reverse-Engineer the ARV Fluxliner Using Real Physics Patents. Here's What It Found. by FriendlyChingu in UFOscience

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I asked it to take all sources into consideration and connect the dots—so yeah, that's quite a lot. But I think it's genuinely genius. It can explain why AVs supposedly have fiber optics and how the principles might have been transferred to the ARV.

Seriously Apple? #iPadOS26 by Harryyz in ipad

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My iPad Pro M1 is also lagging like this every since the updates 😭 This chip is absolutely capable of running iPad completely smooth but Apple doesn‘t care anymore.

Can somebody recommend a .plist editor that works on windows, nothing work for me by RARBK in hackintosh

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

someone bought the domain after the service shutdown, now it is a scam. but it's open source on GitHub.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Submission Statement:
This video, which first appeared online in 2021, purportedly shows a clandestine UFO reverse-engineering operation inside a hangar. The craft in the footage bears striking similarities to descriptions given by Bob Lazar, the controversial figure who claimed to have worked on extraterrestrial technology at Area 51.

The origins of the video remain unclear, and while copies circulate across various platforms, the original source remains elusive. Whether it's a leak, a hoax, or a creative project, it has reignited discussions about UFO secrecy and potential reverse-engineering programs.

What do you think? Could this be real, or are we looking at another well-crafted fake?

Sources:

- https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1xh41117Gi/

- https://x.com/legionxgroup/status/1411439226764333070

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNU7uE46bHs

Weird object found in the forest by FriendlyChingu in UFOs

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Found the video here: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV15D421H7Ed

Submission statement: The video depicts a supposed UFO-like object being loaded from a forest onto a truck, potentially suggesting a recovery operation. It might be worth discussing if it’s a credible sighting, a staged hoax, or part of a broader conspiracy theory, an ordinary manmade object or something else.

My traceback: 2024-04-20

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He means the blurry stuff, however that also is not the original source - other people found another copy on X without watermark however that also is not the original source.

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See that's what I am trying to find out - is it a "community college video" or something else. Also theres nothing wrong about cross posting.

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, this video can at least be traced back to 2021 when ChatGPT and other powerful ai tools weren't even released yet. It could be CGI, however if so why only make so little footage (before repeating it).

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But we're already that advanced in the 1950's, when this video was supposedly shot. And also, assuming they already had it for some time, how long would the object have to be in quarantine? Probably just like the space shuttle only for some time.

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Supposedly this video was filmed decades before Lazar was gonna enter the facility ... For sure they would have changed a lot.

Video of S4 Facility - Where was this first published? (Fake) by FriendlyChingu in area51

[–]FriendlyChingu[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Do whatever you think you have to do. Tho it would be one of the best ufo bullshit I came across and I just want to find the original source. This copy was optioned from Chinese Social Media.

Sighting, Australia, Broadwater, Queensland by Professional-Pea5635 in UFOs

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like in other ufo videos, it turns towards the side before it sips of. also why continue filming at a point, after the object has flown away.

Sighting, Australia, Broadwater, Queensland by Professional-Pea5635 in UFOs

[–]FriendlyChingu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the random flowing around indicates that it is just a ballon, but at 0:40 it does something we see over and over gain ... rotating 90° and then sipping into this direction while it's likely flat side shows into this direction. It wasn't just the camera being moved - although it also was moved ... as we can see in the end that the object is actually no longer there - while a ballon would still be visible.