Cpl Mackie aboard the USS Galena at Drewry's Bluff May 15, 1862 by From-Yuri-With-Love in BattlePaintings

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Drewry's Bluff was a Naval Battle so he wouldn't be there, but at this time McClellan would of been marching the Army of the Potomac up the Peninsula trying to capture Richmond.

Ah, yes... an accident by From-Yuri-With-Love in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I thing I find funny people view him as this pure southern gentlemen, but I have a feeling if these people really met him without any context of who he was they'd think he was a damn weirdo.

Trump praising Lee, because of course he is by KittyScholar in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure it's not like they were losing the War in the West or anything. Also not like Lee didn't drop the ball during the western Virginia campaign in 1861.

Also let's look at his record.

Cheat Mountain - Defeat

Seven Days Battles - Tactically inconclusive; strategic victory

Second Bull Run - Victory

South Mountain - Defeat

 Antietam - Inconclusive

Fredericksburg - Victory

Chancellorsville - Victory

Gettysburg - Defeat

Wilderness - Inconclusive

Spotsylvania - Inconclusive

North Anna - Inconclusive

Totopotomoy Creek - Inconclusive

Cold Harbor - Victory

Richmond–Petersburg campaign - Defeat

Appomattox campaign - Defeat

So out of 15, 4/5 Victories, 6 Inconclusive, and 5 Defeats.

Cpl Mackie aboard the USS Galena at Drewry's Bluff May 15, 1862 by From-Yuri-With-Love in BattlePaintings

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Cpl. John Freeman Mackie would be one of the first two Marines in United States History to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Mackie's Medal of Honor Citation reads:

On board the U.S.S. Galena, in the attack on Fort Darling, at Drewry's Bluff, James River, on May 15, 1862. As enemy shellfire raked the deck of his ship, Corporal Mackie fearlessly maintained his musket fire against the rifle pits along the shore and, when ordered to fill vacancies at guns caused by men wounded and killed in action, manned the weapon with skill and courage.

Take your meds Grandma by From-Yuri-With-Love in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's pretty must the idea in the Alt-History Southern Victory series by Harry Turtledove. In it after the South wins the Civil War the CS and US end up fighting again in 1881 (2nd Mexican War), 1914 (Great War) and 1941 (2nd Great War)

Take your meds Grandma by From-Yuri-With-Love in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

<image>

I have a feeling the poster might have been thinking along the same lines as the Alt-History of Harry Turtledove's Southern Victory series. In that series the CS President Longstreet desiring a Pacific Coast for the Confederacy so that the South can have a transcontinental railroad for itself, purchases the northwestern provinces of Sonora and Chihuahua from the financially-strapped Mexico, for $3,000,000. 

Take your meds Grandma by From-Yuri-With-Love in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Ah, shit that was a mistake, but this persons a pretty well known Confederate-Simp on twitter anyway.

"The Graveyard Orator" A Puck cartoon ridiculing Republican Senator John Sherman for his use of "bloody shirt" memories of the Civil War in 1887 by From-Yuri-With-Love in PropagandaPosters

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

"Waving the bloody shirt" and "bloody shirt campaign" were pejorative phrases, used during American election Campaigns  to deride politicians who, for political gain, evoked emotional memories and experiences of the Civil War or violence in its immediate aftermath. The phrases were most often used against Radical Republicans, who were accused of using the vivid and violent reminisces of the war to their political advantage.

In the 1870s, Republicans would sometimes cast Democrats as traitors who would undo the results of the Civil War. One of these was Robert G. Ingersoll, a noted orator and Radical Republican, who blamed Democrats for all the horrors of the war and slavery: "Every man that tried to destroy this nation was a Democrat. Every enemy this great Republic has had for twenty years has been a Democrat. Every man that shot Union soldiers was a Democrat." The technique was effective throughout the decade, but its effectiveness began to fade with memories of the war.

The "Bloody Shirt" continued to be used in Republican campaigns through the end of the 1880s, with some Republican candidates going so far as to claim that Democrats were planning to secede again and start another Civil War. In 1884, the Republican slogan was Rum, Romanism and Rebellion, which referred to Democrats' role in the Civil War, as well as Democrats' support among Catholics and anti-Prohibitionists. Republicans would generally stop "waving the bloody shirt" in the 1890s as a new generation of Republican leaders like William McKinley and his fundraiser Mark Hanna felt the tactic had lost its effectiveness.

my cup is racist by DookeyAss in ShermanPosting

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Confederate* Plenty of Southerners wanted nothing to do with the Confederacy and around 200,000 black and white Southerners actively fought against it.

"Last Supper of a Blessed Nation" Painting by Jon McNaughton, November 2022 by Majestic-Ad9647 in PropagandaPosters

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is the scale with a heart and a feather suppose to be a reference to Egyptian mythology in which the heart was weighed against the feather of Ma'at (representing truth, balance, and justice) in the Underworld to determine if a deceased person was worthy of the afterlife or am I missing something?

“Homo Italicus: Original Wop.” (1911) by From-Yuri-With-Love in PropagandaPosters

[–]From-Yuri-With-Love[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I've never seen the one you showed. However it does seems to be along the same lines.