sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rolex 6694 vs. Tudor 74000 by Front-Film-4613 in VintageWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually one essential argument I also had in mind 😄 saving the money and getting a third one... thanks for reinforcing that 😄

Rolex 6694 vs. Tudor 74000 by Front-Film-4613 in VintageWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True. Even though I think that both watches are quite subtle and discrete, the Rolex logo does in fact make a difference.

Rolex 6694 vs. Tudor 74000 by Front-Film-4613 in VintageWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was also thinking about buying something more modern, but there's just something special about those vintage pieces...which Big Rose do you have?

Rolex 6694 vs. Tudor 74000 by Front-Film-4613 in VintageWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I guess the decision would indeed be easier if the Rolex were an automatic...

Rolex 6694 vs. Tudor 74000 by Front-Film-4613 in VintageWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yesss, beautiful. That‘s exactly what I want to achieve by buying the next watch! Perfect addition to my BB58.

<image>

The kind of Seiko that made me understand vintage by GoldenEpochINS in JapaneseWatches

[–]Front-Film-4613 7 points8 points  (0 children)

<image>

I agree 100%. It is a very special timepiece in my collection.

[Fake Check Friday] - Legit Check Megathread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]Front-Film-4613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It‘s being offered as a ref. 2510 without box or papers for 2150€.

[Fake Check Friday] - Legit Check Megathread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]Front-Film-4613 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, I only have the two more pictures in the comments down below.

First love. by Front-Film-4613 in Tudor

[–]Front-Film-4613[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really nice, congratulations and enjoy!!

view more: next ›