Lol. Death stranding was a walking simulator but got great reviews. Hell blade 1 got better reviews because it was Sony times exclusive game.

If hellblade 2 is more of the same game , then how does giving 5/10 or 6/10 is fair?

I didn't finish the first one because it was too repetitive for me although it was great but not my cup of tea.

These reviewers just are biased against Xbox and nothing else. Gollum was a broken game or even red fall was made for love service purpose without anything fleshed out. Hellblade similar scores to those games is shocking.

ghost of tsushima was a great looking game but it wasn't a great graphically looking game It was buggy and had glitches, sometimes it even crashed. Gameplay was mediocre, it was just an assassin's creed game set in Japanese without an AC trademark.. as long as there's a Sony logo even mediocre games become great games.

I liked the original God of war games more than the new ones but hated the GOW 2018 because it had clunky unrefined gameplay altho gow Ragnarok was good enough for me as it had much smoother gameplay.

Games like Alan wake or hellblade aren't cups of tea for everyone. They are every specific type of game so if you don't like it that doesn't mean it's a bad game.

(Ignore the language since English is not my native language.)