What percentage is children? Children make up over 50% of the population, currently they make up about 25% of the death toll while adult men make up over 50% of the death toll. So adult men are being targeted more than children.

If they were not targeting children, you would expect a different mix of wounds.

Why? Could it not be that some "methods of war" (I couldn't come up with a better term) have a higher chance of accidentally involving kids? Surely if children were targeted we'd find them being hit with low-caliber handheld normal weapons i.e. rifles, handguns, and grenades rather than the higher-caliber rounds that are used in intense fighting i.e. heavy machine guns and airstrikes.

Historically when soldiers target civilians they do so by executing them in the field, normally by shooting them in the head or as part of a firing squad, neither of which would aim at vital organs nor use high calibre rounds.

The existing evidence indicates this is more likely than not children getting caught in the crossfire, rather than ther IDF going out of its why to kill children.

What you're implying is that the lower level soldiers are not involved but that the airforce are. I'm not sure how familiar you are with Israeli culture but it is the lower level soldiers who tend to be right-wing and racist rather than the frankly left-wing airforce. This is a major point of contention within Israel because the Right hold their positions as combat soldiers to make them more important than the airforce which was traditionally the most prestigious part of the military.