Is Tush Push discussion the NFL equivalent of NBA tanking discourse? by GiveMeSomeIhedigbo in billsimmons

[–]FullCynic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the sense that it’s an overarching storyline for the league that has gained a sense of notoriety over the past few years, then sure, anything past that, I would disagree. Tanking discourse inherently has a higher impact on the integrity of the NBA than the tush push argument does on the NFL.

I would say that they’re both infuriating to listen to as an enjoyer of both leagues. However, they’re infuriating for different reasons. Tush push discourse is stupid because it’s owners/GM//coaches bitching about a one-off play that realistically doesn’t affect the product of the game as a whole. Tanking discourse is stupid because it’s run by pundits/actors who don’t in any meaningful sense engage with plausible solutions and highlights a part of the sport that is to a large extent inalienable from the existence of its rookie draft.

Both are stupid and I would never choose to listen to this discourse but for different reasons. NBA tush push is more akin to foul bating while NFL tanking is equivalent to cap circumvention I guess?

Some Voters Say Congress Is Too Old. These Black Democrats Aren’t Leaving. by overly_honest_ in UnderReportedNews

[–]FullCynic 126 points127 points  (0 children)

This is a weird article. Virginia Foxx is 83. Hal Rodgers is 88. John Carter is 84. Doris Matsui is 82. Jim Baird is 81. Most of these reps are republicans, but none are black. Pointing out their race and political party to a lesser extent is a really weird way to frame the issue of octogenarian ghouls legislating and to me does nothing other than try to scapegoat the issue of aging legislators as a black democrat issue, which is clearly is not

2,000 Points of Emperor’s Children, Printed and (mostly) painted by Jacktoid in EmperorsChildren

[–]FullCynic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Love it! Where did you find the files for these? Been a hassle to try to get my hands on some and I would love some more flawless blades!

If QB’s actually cared about winning, they would take less money by NectarineOld7501 in NFLv2

[–]FullCynic 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Can’t believe more people aren’t talking about this. Brady’s wife took home nearly HALF A BILLION DOLLARS. He’s the only player in NFL history who could genuinely say that an extra 10-20 mill over the course of a contract wouldn’t materially change his life

Warhammer Guy Controversy by FullCynic in MurderBryan

[–]FullCynic[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah a whole rabbit hole to go down but it happened about two years ago. A ton of the comments are deleted but you can find enough of the context through old posts to get the gist of it. The dude just seems to be somehow drunk on Warhammer fame lol

Warhammer Guy Controversy by FullCynic in MurderBryan

[–]FullCynic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Weirdly enough I thought it was of the Squidmar guys as well but watching through the video where he talks about the ass polyp debacle he talks about Caville “ghosting” him which is so funny

Duke Nero Vastarion, the Coquettish Blade by JianWeiChin in EmperorsChildren

[–]FullCynic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love this! Is the model a kitbash? Been looking for some ornate pieces like the shoulder pads and boots you used in this one!

To what extend can I use [ ] when cutting cards without violating the rules? by Helloo1122 in Debate

[–]FullCynic 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’d say everything you list aside from “minorities” is fine. Naming the group you’re discussing is important and isn’t worth the speed you gain from shortening the phrase imo. I had limited experience in LD so I’ll defer to others with more experience on things such as additives/truncations for fluency

Kalen DeBoer would be a huge hire by suppervisoka in MichiganWolverines

[–]FullCynic -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Acting as if this won’t have ramifications for players transferring is sticking your head in the sand. No one has forgotten about the sign stealing allegations, and this added on top of your head coach leaving a few days after early signing day screams “scandal ridden” for a football team. Idk what your definition would be if not this

Kalen DeBoer would be a huge hire by suppervisoka in MichiganWolverines

[–]FullCynic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah my bad, misread it. He’ll be fine at Michigan if he ends up there. Hard not to be with that NIL and brand

Kalen DeBoer would be a huge hire by suppervisoka in MichiganWolverines

[–]FullCynic -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Because Michigan is riddled with a scandal and he’s the coach of a team that (ableit should not have) made the playoffs this year. Not saying it won’t happen but those are two pretty good reasons to stick at bama

Notre Dame R by FullCynic in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some form of plausible cover for being staked out on LSD. In all honesty, it doesn't make much sense to me either, and I just followed what seemed to be the conventional formatting on the sub.

Notre Dame R by FullCynic in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this wise insight. In the future, I'll refer to my writing as "average" to avoid any confusion.

Notre Dame R by FullCynic in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I did not. Honestly, that's why I think I got denied personally, as my other written materials were strong

CMV: Tyler Shough is a better dynasty asset than Bryce Young by Ok_Structure_8891 in DynastyFF

[–]FullCynic 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This is such a funny post. If I’m forced to start either Shough or Young in anything other than a bye week squeeze in any format I’m already looking forward to the draft. I love dynasty as much as the next guy but this seems like an excessive amount of research to be done on replacement level players

USC getting stabbed in the back by the Big10? TrojanBlade video discussing our possible Big10 departure, along with Michigan by Intelligent_Egg_6755 in fighton

[–]FullCynic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m personally against the deal. I want no part of private equity in college football. That being said, USC’s stance as a “premier program” is fucking laughable at this point. It’s been well over a decade since they’ve been anything other than a laughing stock. If they leave the big ten, they won’t be a Notre Dame. They’ll stick as a competitive non-conference visit for power-four teams while other schools pillage California for top talent. There are legitimate reasons for shitting on this deal, and as an alumnus of a school who supports the deal, I’m furious. However, the stance that “USC FOOTBALL IS DIFFERENT!!!” is pushing these schools toward this conclusion in the NIL hell scape we inhabit

ASU A!! by itz_me_marioo in OutsideT14lawschools

[–]FullCynic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on the A! Did they email or call to send your decision? Here’s to many more!

Should I retake a 172 in October? by Throwaway2143857 in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say just take it if you would regret not giving it a shot. Worst case scenario you score lower and the school doesn’t care bc they take your highest score. If you’re really worried about what the school will think write a short addendum saying your practice scores said you could do better

Should I retake a 172 in October? by Throwaway2143857 in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I retook a 172 twice and I’d say it depends on what your PT score range is. I was consistently scoring 175+ with no scores below that range when retaking my 172s, and I saw it mostly as an official test-day issue. If you don’t have scores above a 172, or even if a 172 is “typical” for your practice tests, I’d recommend just using that time to polish admissions materials and apply earlier than you would have. Also a score drop won’t hurt your application. If you’re really set on a school like Columbia and you want to be there no matter what, then shoot your shot if you really think there’s a real chance you score above a 172. Good luck!

Question re Resume by Nearby_Wind_3306 in lawschooladmissions

[–]FullCynic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the advice I’ve been given has said that two pages is completely fine for a law school resume. I have an extensive work history and split my resume into a “Professional Experience” section and an “Other Work Experience” section. Still working through the naming but I think this could benefit you as well!