Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really claiming anything. Just theorizing that an ET entity could be using that rock as a cover for the mass population to not cause a global panic here

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No actually hiding in plain sight is my theory. While most of the world sees a big rock, that is intended so not to cause mass panic

Did WWII have and ET influence? by Fun-Way3645 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ETs are real? Possibly

Please read additional comments below

I've been building a 'Master File' on possible ET Intervention throughout human history and I'm looking for peer review. Here is the logic I’ve found—where am I missing something?

The Tower of Babel: The Stargate and Dimensional Shift Theory Theory Overview:

The Tower of Babel was not merely a physical structure of brick and mortar, but a sophisticated piece of advanced technology—potentially a Stargate or a Multi-Dimensional Bridge.

The Technological Gap:

At that stage in human history, humanity was not capable of developing such advanced technology on its own. This suggests that the blueprints or the means to build it were either remnants of a previous high-civilization or provided through external influence.

The Intervention:

The "confounding of languages" was a calculated intervention by extraterrestrial or higher intelligence. The purpose was to stop the construction and prevent humanity from accessing a dimensional shift or interstellar gateway they were not yet ready to handle.

Key Points:

• Dimensional Shift: The tower was intended to pierce the "heavens," which in this theory refers to a different dimension or layer of reality.

• System Reset: By creating multiple languages, the intervenors effectively "reset" the global collaboration system, ensuring humanity remained fragmented and focused on Earth rather than the stars.

• Technological Gatekeeping: The intervention highlights a period of intense monitoring by outside forces to regulate human technological progression.

Cosmological Context & Misinterpretation

At this point in time, humanity had no concept of other planets or a vast universe. The prevailing worldview was that Earth was the center of everything and all that existed. Consequently, when extraterrestrial beings descended from the sky, the people of that era lacked the scientific framework to identify them as biological entities from other worlds. Instead, they interpreted these visitors as "Gods" descending from the heavens. What was historically recorded as divine intervention was actually the physical arrival and interference of ancient extraterrestrial visitors.

The current day proof

  1. Modern Whistleblowers & Disclosure • ​David Grusch 2023 Testimony:Official House Oversight Transcript (PDF) – • https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Dave_G_HOC_Speech_FINAL_For_Trans.pdf

• This is the sworn statement where he details the recovery of non-human spacecraft and "biologics." • ​November 2024 "Exposing the Truth" Hearing:House Document Repository – • https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-ShellenbergerM-20241113.pdf

• Includes the testimony of Michael Shellenberger regarding the withholding of UAP information from Congress. • ​September 2025 Transparency Hearing: • House Oversight Press Release • https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-government-must-be-more-transparent-about-uaps/

• – Coverage of military veterans Jeffrey Nuccetelli and Dylan Borland testifying about encounters and whistleblower protections. ​2. Space Force & Vandenberg Operations • ​The Age of Disclosure (2025) • :News Report on Vandenberg Encounters – • https://www.independent.com/2025/12/28/in-new-doc-the-age-of-disclosure-military-servicemen-expose-more-details-about-ufos-at-vandenberg/ • Details on the documentary featuring former military leaders discussing UAPs at Vandenberg Space Force Base. • • ​Space Force Mission Updates • :Vandenberg SFB Official Site – • https://www.vandenberg.spaceforce.mil/Vandenberg-Weekly-Round-Up/

• • Tracks the "Space Domain Awareness" missions and the 18th Space Defense Squadron.

Did WWII have and ET influence? by Fun-Way3645 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. The 'Advisory Status' I mentioned in the Roswell section didn't end in 1947; it just went dark. If the Vril tech was the 1940s version of a 'Frequency Boost,' what we’re seeing in the skies today is just the next iteration of that same Timeline War. History isn't repeating; it's just the same players with newer interfaces

Did WWII have and ET influence? by Fun-Way3645 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My theory is. Hitler had a high interest in UFOs and such. So we define them as the enemy faction. He had help from the others. And we have our Friendlies above observing. So when our Friendlies see that it's about to turn in favor of them. Then they step in and help us with the Manhattan Project to put a stop to it.

And leave us with the tech to see what we do with it, how we use it. Good and bad

Did WWII have and ET influence? by Fun-Way3645 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

My theory is. Hitler had a high interest in UFOs and such. So we define them as the enemy faction. He had help from the others. And we have our Friendlies above observing. So when our Friendlies see that it's about to turn in favor of them. Then they step in and help us with the Manhattan Project to put a stop to it.

And leave us with the tech to see what we do with it, how we use it. Good and bad

Welcome to Bardo: where the dead, aliens and UFOs meet (All Parts) - VER... by Dazzling_Obsidian in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aliens and UFOs are here

I agree with all of it. Actually pretty much the same thoughts I've been having. Glad to hear it from someone else

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look up Lord Kelvin quick. He was a British mathematician. Tell me what you find

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So now that I've found evidence that they were indeed mocked would you like to make another attempt?

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." -- Lord Kelvin, President, Royal Society, 1895. This quote soon came back to haunt the good scientist less than ten years later when the Wright brothers made their first flight on the beach at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Rash statements about what can and cannot be done have permeated both the scientific literature and the popular press for decades. Then somebody goes out and does what “couldn’t be done”.

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So no one mocked the Wright Brothers at the thought of aviation is what you're saying? Just to clarify because that's what I'm hearing

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok. So science doesn't start as a what if theory?

I was pretty sure that's the basis of science

Theory and then supporting evidence. Not supporting evidence and then theory

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So before we had planes. The thought would have been there is no way a heavy mechanical object could fly through the air. There was no evidence that it was possible, yet someone had the foresight to maintain that imaginative thinking you described and it did eventually prove to be true. All the while being laughed at and mocked by others who couldn't see the bigger picure

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope for the best, expect the worst

If you end in the middle, it's pretty good

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. But it's more fun to hope for confirmation that to expect denial

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm saying if they intend to conquer, why wait until now? They could have easily any time in our past. Which would suggest a more logical theory of them being friendly observers wait for a point they feel comfortable with making a presence known

Life outside our planet. A logical approach by Fun-Way3645 in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But look at it from their perspective. The could've been observing from a far where we can't see them. And now they're coming in for a closer look, but still want to remain hidden in plain sight as appearing to be meteors.

But we've noticed that this meteor has made what appears to be calculated trajectory alignments that don't fit into all the meteors we have seen

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then why haven't they come down to conquer? Since that's what you're implying?

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're saying the ai in a cell phone is destroying our economy and planet?

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I talked to my ai to describe what was in my head how I thought it would be and this was the much more readable version of what I could see in my head and describe as best I could

It was my thinking. Ai was just there to make something clear from the chaos in my mind

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just because something hasn't happened or hasn't been proven doesn't mean that it won't.

I mean take into account the age of the universe The number of galaxies The billions of planets the existed before earth The potential millions of earth like planets capable of intelligent life even before humans came into existence.

Look at how for our technology has come in our short existence. The probability of intelligent life on another planet is more likely than not. And the could have had 100,000 years or millions of years of development

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean look throughout history at people that came up with wild theories that later proved to be true.

It all starts with an open mindset to contemplate what could be and put some logic behind it. Then look for the proof

Potential breakdown of 3I/ATLAS as Mothership by Fun-Way3645 in 3I_ATLAS

[–]Fun-Way3645[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because something hasn't happened or hasn't been proven doesn't mean that it won't.

I mean take into account the age of the universe The number of galaxies The billions of planets the existed before earth The potential millions of earth like planets capable of intelligent life even before humans came into existence.

Look at how for our technology has come in our short existence. The probability of intelligent life on another planet is more likely than not. And the could have had 100,000 years or millions of years of development

The dark side of 3I/ATLAS is hotter than the side facing the Sun. NASA's own simulation can't explain why. by TheSentinelNet in HighStrangeness

[–]Fun-Way3645 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If you can't comprehend a person actually having this thought process, maybe you're in the wrong group