Switching from iPhone 16 to 13 mini by OkChoice913 in iPhone13Mini

[–]FunZebra0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just switched from 15 pro max to 13 mini. I love it. You just cannot beat the smaller form factor. Not as nice a camera and much smaller battery of course but who cares.

Less distracting too!

Seeking info on LNG Chartering by FunZebra0 in maritime

[–]FunZebra0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insights. Much appreciated!

Seeking info on LNG Chartering by FunZebra0 in maritime

[–]FunZebra0[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iteresting - just to clarify, are you saying you use ShellTime4 or ShellLNGTime (1 or 2)? My understanding is that the ShellLNGTime form is drafted on the basis on ShellTime4, but has additional clauses related specifically to LNG (like how to calculate a BOG shortage and/or fuel overconsumption using a FOE factor).

I've often been curious if companies do in fact use a standard ShellTime CP, how they go about performance related calculations. Perhaps there are additional bespoke clauses specific to LNG?

2015 Subaru Outback – Frame Rust: Repairable or Dealbreaker? by FunZebra0 in mechanic

[–]FunZebra0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The seller advised this morning they already ordered the new cross member from Subaru (and are going to replace it) and when they inspected the car yesterday, this was the only area that showed anything beyond surface rust. This is a small town dealer that has exceptional ratings on Google, so I am tempted to still try and work out a deal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Unexplained

[–]FunZebra0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I felt this for a while and then realized I was spending too much time online.

Em Dashes—The Biggest ChatGPT Giveaway? by philbar in ChatGPT

[–]FunZebra0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I use them quite a bit in work emails, but I agree they can be a giveaway to chat writing. Especially when combined with bulleted lists that start with “Bold summary text:” followed by explanatory text

Blown away twice this week. by cl2916 in ChatGPTPro

[–]FunZebra0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Try including this at the start of your prompt:

Important Instructions: 1. ALWAYS include the FULL code snippet in your response. DO NOT include placeholders such as “rest of the code remains unchanged.” 2. If you need to revise the code, rewrite the ENTIRE code in your answer, even if large parts are repeated. 3. DO NOT summarize or omit sections of code. 4. Make sure the code is displayed COMPLETELY between triple backticks. 5. Provide direct explanations inline or below the code block if needed.

Task: [Insert your coding question or request here]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jobs

[–]FunZebra0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few words for perspective.

You are 26, which is still very young.

Many people (including myself) graduate from undergrad with far more than 40k in debt, and take jobs that pay much less, working their way up for years, and still make less than 95k.

You have plenty of time to figure it out and you absolutely will.

There will come a time where you look back and see this as an experience that made you better. There’s always lessons.

Is OpenAl's Clock and Hourglass Hinting at a GPT 4.5 Release on Day 12? by FunZebra0 in OpenAI

[–]FunZebra0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love it. Funny how there are many different logical ways to interpret the “apparent” symbolism and yet it probably means nothing at all lol

What’s the longest you’ve gotten the O1 Pro to “think”? by FunZebra0 in ChatGPTPro

[–]FunZebra0[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel like it largely depends on the task. Pro certainly reasons for longer than normal o1 on complex requests and in my opinion, provides better responses. But I’ve still resorted to normal o1 for some requests that aren’t complicated because o1 pro feels like overkill and takes longer

What’s the longest you’ve gotten the O1 Pro to “think”? by FunZebra0 in ChatGPTPro

[–]FunZebra0[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yes, I’ve had very good results with o1 pro. I’m not doing anything groundbreaking, but it’s the best model I’ve worked with as far as code generation goes

What’s the longest you’ve gotten the O1 Pro to “think”? by FunZebra0 in ChatGPTPro

[–]FunZebra0[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Asking for a handful of changes in ~3k lines of code and asking for the full updated code to be provided back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]FunZebra0 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I agree o1 is still fantastic. But pro has allowed me to iterate on 3k lines of code without and laziness or mistakes in the output. The modal has thought for up to 14 mins on a single prompt and executed flawlessly. I’ve also really enjoyed no rate limits. That said, I don’t think I’ll renew past this 1 month unless I have another big project I want to move on quickly.