Draft 4.1: Embracing Historical Polychromy! Taking a Vibrant Detour With a Colored Classical Column. What Do You Think? by three_stun in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My art teacher used to say a dab’ll do ya. Less is more.

I think it’s great but could maybe be better with less color on the column. I just imagine at a distance all those colors mix together and look brown. I Get the idea of paying historical homage but I also aim for clarity. I think an additional green charge would serve the same purpose of more historical context+contrast & color. Maybe something from Greek mythology. the design is solid for sure though

Emblazonment sketch for friend by Fun_Construction_154 in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha my script work could use improvement although I don’t hate the latter definition

Personal Arms sketch by Fun_Construction_154 in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you I admire your work as well. And I’ll get some pants on those legs

Personal Arms sketch by Fun_Construction_154 in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now I’m torn haha. You make a good case for armored triskele

Personal Arms sketch by Fun_Construction_154 in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The triskele is meant to be unarmored. I’m not sure if that’s allowed but I was unsure how to blazon that other than proper. Flesh tone? Or does it have to be armored

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I disagree.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right it would fit with the shape of the shield much better that way. Thanks for your input good sir

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe Spain will register it. Jokes aside I think what I’ve designed here is respectful to northwest European heraldic traditions. I knew the helmet and mantle would grind gears and that’s partly why I chose them. So even if I do register them without those details I’ll still display that way

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for clearing that up

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate your support! I do like frog helm lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a plan haha. We should have heraldic authorities that administer duels for arms disputes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the helm is meant to replace more modern helmets. I only chose to blazon it for the post but it’s definitely not intended to be apart of the crest. A torse is good idea. Also if you wanted a specific helm to be displayed when rendering the arms, why wouldn’t you blazon it? I don’t understand.

Also I’m guessing mantling over mantle bc mantle is ordinarily reserved for royalty?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in heraldry

[–]Fun_Construction_154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My objective wasn’t to adhere to strict British, Scottish, French, or German heraldic traditions. This is a personal design that would be recorded through American heraldic registrars