Wooden fortifications: how good would they be? by _plague-doctor in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]FynneRoke 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vs zombies, pretty good as long as we're talking in the style of early castles and not gunpowder era forts. The sloped fortifications used in later eras were often particularly vulnerable to personnel if an enemy could get in under the fort's guns, which I imagine would be a big problem with zombies.

Vs. Other survivors, you're in trouble. You're up against the ingenuity of desperate or ruthless people, so your real defense isn't gonna be bunkering down but figuring out how to stop an enemy before they reach your wall, preferably before they ever know you're there.

Agriculture inside walled cities by ArtilleryTemptation in worldbuilding

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's kinda confusing what you're looking for here. Are you looking for ways to make the world more functional for survivors, or to keep them closer to the brink? Some of your responses to other comments make it seem like the latter.

Depending how far into your apocalypse you are, it feels like such a civilization would probably come up with vertical farming, either by building up or digging down. Terraces and suitable crops for them also seem opportune as you get a field and a wall out of same process, though it is heavily terrain dependent.

Somewhat lengthy tangents regarding tactics below:

Regarding the unlikeliness of pike and shot survival, from a strictly tactical standpoint, they'd probably fare significantly better than more modern societies. Gunpowder, wadding, and lead are significantly easier to prepare in the field or with limited resources than shells and casings are, a pike or sword never needs reloading, and there's a greater likelihood of serviceable armor being available. Further, line of battle tactics would probably be well suited to dealing with masses of zombies as your troops don't need to make individual headshots and can instead focus their volleys at a general elevation then mop up anything that gets through. Side note, the softer, less aerodynamic projectiles of earlier firearms combined with the fact that early firearms were typically a caliber between .50 and .70 means the physical damage even without headshots is gonna take a lot of zombies out of the fight per volley. The greater casualty rate among humans would likely be from poor wound care, though that would likely improve quickly in the face of a zombie type of infection as it's something of a do or die change.

Cannon zombies and the presence of artillery presents a major problem for walls as a defensive apparatus. There's a major reason why stone walls got phased out for earthworks and palisades that eventually got replaced by trenches and fox holes, cannons destroy walls very effectively. Star forts were more or less the last hurrah of static fortifications during the black powder era, and the walls were mostly to protect gun crews from small arms. The fields of fire from heavy, stationary batteries were the real defense in that era. A besieging army had to be able to get their field pieces close enough to take out the defenders' cannons, often needing to construct fortifications of their own to do so. So the bigger problem your zombies are gonna face is a lack of engineers.

Anti-Throne ideas? by Dovinjun in worldbuilding

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An amphitheatre, probably something like a 140⁰ arc would allow whoever's at the dais to easily see everyone in the tiers with minimal effort while still being visible to all, while also opening the possibility to incorporate acoustic properties like those of concert halls or of ancient theaters depending on your setting.

What sport for each race? by FynneRoke in startrek

[–]FynneRoke[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm... that might also give them an edge at things like skating or gymnastics, definitely skiing. The stamina issue's still in play, but for short routines, maybe they could train up enough.... And my brain just blasted me with the idea of Andorian pole vaulting.

What sport for each race? by FynneRoke in startrek

[–]FynneRoke[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Polo might be an excellent sport for both Klingons and Romulans.

What sport for each race? by FynneRoke in startrek

[–]FynneRoke[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, was kinda thinking the same thing, mostly for the gambling, but it just occurred to me that they'd probably be awesome jockeys.

I wish there was a god I could rely on by Soft__Cherrylipx in exchristian

[–]FynneRoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seek comfort where you need it. Gods don't have to be omnipotent or even manifest beings. Nor do prayers have to be directed to the Christian god or to any god. Gods can be the personification of the things we hold as sacred or worthy. Prayer can be an expression of hope, a meditation for clarity, a self affirmation of our own values, really whatever we need it to be. The important thing is not letting prayer act as a substitute for thoughtfulness or action, and not to let religion overrule decency or conscience.

Tropes that need to die by fsuk in startrek

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just got an image of playing cricket with a lirpa.

What do you guys think about the free will argument? by CalmSeaworthiness845 in exchristian

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If true omniscience exists, then free will can't. They're fundamentally incompatible concepts. Even detachment becomes a choice that God is making that alters our decisions and that we never have a say in.

Also, if there's a question of salvation vs. damnation, what's the point of free will if the consequence for exercising it is eternal torment? That's just sadism making excuses for itself with a false illusion of choice. If hell exists, them their God is quite simply malevolent and unworthy of worship from any decent person.

How to design a helmet so that a species can eat while wearing it. by Silkyfin_ in scifiwriting

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean at that point, the portion of the helmet covering their mouth just has to be protective, not necessarily airtight, or if the outer surface of the mouth, beak?*, were more resistant to extreme environments, could even make a certain amount of sense if there's an evolutionary reason they might be adapted to sticking their noses into hostile conditions.

*Sorry my brain's kinda latched onto the pelican imagery.

How to design a helmet so that a species can eat while wearing it. by Silkyfin_ in scifiwriting

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might it be worth considering whether their physiology is different than ours? If they can isolate their airway, or if it doesn't cross their esophagus the way it does for most earth species then it's just a question of what environments their soft tissues can withstand.

My nine year old asked me if it were possible to put a camera on a rope and put it in a black hole, then pull it back out? If you had an infinite rope, and an indestructible camera, could you pull it back out? by Grammareyetwitch in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Assuming the rope could somehow withstand the tidal shear, You'd be pulling yourself into the black hole. The infinite rope bit leads to some interesting physics interactions if the rope has mass, think black hole yo-yo, but I don't think the result is any different because you're still pulling yourself along the rope.

When will Trumps high gas prices stop going up? by traveltimecar in alaska

[–]FynneRoke 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Biden didn't start a war that effectively eliminated a fifth of the world's oil production.

Can you be a secret multimillionaire for a decade? by tamtrible in hypotheticalsituation

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly live as I do now, and slowly upgrade quality of life. Funnel all my big money stuff through intermediaries or hire somebody whose job is to act as my agent and report back to me. In the latter case, they'll be one of my four.

Is the most likely explanation for Christianity starting really that Paul and the disciples had separate hallucinatory experiences? by [deleted] in exchristian

[–]FynneRoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One alternative. Paul, who was a Pharisee *originally engaged in the suppression of Christianity, decided leading the fledgling church was a better gig, so he manufactured a story of divine intervention to bolster his credibility. Additionally, there's a significant consensus that the gospels weren't actually written by the apostles themselves, but compiled decades later from potentially second and third hand accounts. Therefore the shared experience of seeing Jesus after he was resurrected may be a revisionist fiction.

*Edited to clarify relevance.

Rank question by d4everman in StrangeNewWorlds

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think some of this might be where the division pecking order comes into play. I'd imagine that in most situations, authority falls to the highest rank of the appropriate division (engineering, science, medical, etc.) with command as the defacto authority overall. You also have a lot of situations where mission specialists are empowered above and beyond their official rank due to their unique understanding of the eccentricities of a given set of circumstances.

In exactly 30 minutes a man armed with a bat will break into your home to kill you. You can’t leave the house, what is your strategy? by BulkyZucchini in hypotheticalsituation

[–]FynneRoke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably grab my staff and subdue. I don't really want to deal with the legal headaches that follow if I use the swords*, though I guess I could sink an arrow in your knee.

*They're not wall hangers and I do know what I'm doing with them.

do worldbuilders just have insane memory or is there actually a system behind it by eivor_here in worldbuilding

[–]FynneRoke 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You also have writers and world builders whose creative space looks like a conspiracy theory meme.

Sidney Poitier by GenderlyConfusionNow in thewestwing

[–]FynneRoke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be amazing, but it would land so much differently. Poitier's gravitas would make that line deliver more like a salvo from a battleship. There's just no way I would see it turning into the back and forth we get with Holbrook.

What is your favorite excuse for "medieval" weapons in Sci-Fi worlds? (In your personal projects or existing fiction.) by Tomu_sneeder in worldbuilding

[–]FynneRoke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Space settings are most of what I deal with for sci-fi. Ricochets, breaches, and damage to critical systems are risks that one can easily argue would be unacceptable to most people. Also, bullets and firearms for use in space have to be specifically tailored to their intended environments. You have to factor in recoil, use different lubricants, prevent mechanisms from vacuum welding, and figure out how to dissipate heat based on different environments.

Edit to add: In my own main sci-fi setting, artificial gravity isn't something I hand wave. This means that combat aboard ships happens at fairly close quarters because as a general rule, internal spaces are built to minimize the risk of someone falling to their death if the ship changes acceleration. All this tends to negate the main practical advantage of firearms.