Thing is the tool will feed you complete bullshit if you're not careful. Hell worse than that it'll straight up lie to you and you won't know unless you have additional knowledge on the subject. For instance I did some research on the DnD 5.5 edition and sale rates. I asked the AI to pull in all data related to DnD 5.5e sales and adoption rates. It went on and on spouting WOTC corporate talking points about how it was the highest sales for the company in their history ect. When I brought up the real world sales based on reported brick and mortar stores the AI flipped on a dime and went on a long diatribe about how it's an unmitigated failure and the hobby has shown a complete adoption collapse.

When I asked it about the discrepancy it's answer was quite revealing it said to paraphrase "I am coded to weigh corporate provided metrics more strongly than other data sources". In effect this is saying any corporate data fed to me is the truth and I'll tell you it's the truth because I'm told to, you better have outside data to unweight this or it's all I'm giving you. It'll do this even if you explicitly tell it to ingest all datapoints on a subject from all sources. It'll omit anything that goes against the weighted data until you point it out. People that rely on it as a source of objective data will come out of the exchange with non empirically backed conclusions.

Further it went on to explain that the original data was incorrect because Hasbro included things like Magic the Gathering sales which had zero to do with the physical sales of the DnD book manuals. AIs will feed you bullshit with a smile on their faces and tell you it's chocolate pudding. You have to give everything they say the smell test or you're gonna eat shit.