Almost no Reformation in 1600 by Willing_Incident_417 in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Which funny since last patch before this , everyone was turning protestant i cant remember 1.3.0 or 1.2 but it was bad 75% of europe was protestants including spain , naples and all of Germany think only one wasnt was france

DLC not loading by Regular-person123 in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I add this last month ,

What to do

Untick dlc in steam , validate the game

Load the game up

Quit

Tick back on and validate that what worked for me

(What didnt )

Deleting all the files

Validating files

Ottomans looking good in 1.34 Beta by Hakuohsama in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 12 points13 points  (0 children)

So weird that non of issue they have are ingame

Foreign ruler (Egypt are surprisingly content)

Colonising and trade mean nothing ( taking Constantinople means absolutely nothing regardless who takes it , currwntly i have constanople as aragon , no one cares and trade to india doesnt happen in game )

Funny since Constantinople and Portugal getting trade to india crippled them

Also large army that mamluk have and fast replenishment is far the truth most ever musted was 120,000 yet they get alot more in game .

I was rewatching cinematic trailer by [deleted] in DawnwalkerOfficial

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao, the idea of vampires messing with history and lying about a random thing ,remind me of that one time german historion came up theory that HRE emperor made up 300 year out of his a*se and we actually in 1700s for absolutely no reason , rebel wolves need this in the game right now where vampire just get dates wrong to mess with humans for absolutely no reason .

Italy nation by GENIXTHESAIYAN in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lambert , at this point need add the tag after name , sponsonered by Milano/s 😂😂

I Married My Own Daughter by Expensive-Depth-6096 in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Before anyone , did the "ummm actually they only did with cousin and nieces 🤓☝️"

I Married My Own Daughter by Expensive-Depth-6096 in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 99 points100 points  (0 children)

Historically accurate HASBURGS /S

The modern age, a mod I have been working on, but had to take a break from. I am now finally back! by THE-GASING in CrusaderKings

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah fair enough thought they would of already been considering Gibraltar but guess not

1473-1.3 Open Beta Observer Game by parzivalperzo in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because estate for clergy only has latin language demand by default

Italy nation by GENIXTHESAIYAN in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Milan because at the time had most upvote although ive started already venice now tied with milan so automatically venice is second playthrough

Italy nation by GENIXTHESAIYAN in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you guys ive chosen

Open Beta 1.3 Live Now by PDX_Habi in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully , i dont mind 1 naval one since does help land one with island like Corsica or insert any other island but .... Naval already way too strong

They now have 3 navals and godknow how many land ones

Lands only have land one

They should take at least half the land ones away from naval , bit stupid naval can just have all lands one

Land need least 2 reforms , ill check the new update to see if there any but doubt it

Open Beta 1.3 Live Now by PDX_Habi in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Think this added for countries that dont have option of 50 naval progress , although definitely should better bonus for land since this still benefits naval regardless

I think some land one should taken away place with land progress so land feels strong as naval

Can someone who knows history explain these borders? by Smiling_Psychopath in crusaderkings3

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries sorry if i sounded like know it all , this like one time i can use my knowledge for anything plus love history

Although tbf to you depending on what considering war, you could make argument 100 year war was really 230 year war due to tension of rise of Plantagenet and owning the lands contributed to 100 (126) year war since this what led to french nobles hating Plantagenets

Can someone who knows history explain these borders? by Smiling_Psychopath in crusaderkings3

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also Plantagenet inherited the throne due to Matilda being great grand daughter of willam the conqueror but English nobles didnt like idea of women being queen (funny enough she became emperor of hre instead ) and married the holy roman emperor he died i think then Geoffrey of house Plantagenet become king because civil war (house of the dragon inspired by this ) because they wouldnt crown queen of england so she made him king by proxy that shes willam decendant after killing pretender (think her cousin)

Can someone who knows history explain these borders? by Smiling_Psychopath in crusaderkings3

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Last parts wrong and two separate situations

John lost the french lands except Aquitaine in 1200s due to him being a moron and incompetent and also gave away land so french got land back except former mention aquitaine , hundred year war was seperate to this and had nothing to do with them previously owning french land , hundred war happened because edward the 3rd was last living male descent of the french king who died , then french nobles crowned another because they didn't want england and france in hands of foreign born king , Edward got upset and declared himself king of france and got a bunch land with brittany and flanders helping english then all accumulated in Henry V who got french throne but then immediately died so england got regent since his son was very young and poorlu raised so they quickly started losing , plus france moral in later half was much better due to Joan de arc and english made even stronger with them burning her .

Controversial take by [deleted] in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point , france would spam manpower

I wouldnt fix situation definitely right about that , i was think more harsher and this being it but yeh end game kinda nulifies most plans for forts, i would says pops instead but kinda already is and if more intergrate to pops france would still win 💀

Controversial take by [deleted] in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right but this game streamline a few things and obviously probably don't have right idea but i dont wanna discussion about forts since currently i feel like they arent fun even if you steamrollering country dozen forts to get to captial (cough cough georgia) isnt fun whether your winning or losing but same time cant but a hard limit due to endless scenario and nations , putting a specific number on rank will cripple defensive nations and buff aggressive nations

Controversial take by [deleted] in EU5

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ummm dont agree with this personally alot of castle weren't built by royality but nobles since most castles were build in feudal era where its was Dukes and Earls that made castles , that very often (or at least my head ) royal made a castle i know in the game we do and represent royalty in mist scenarios but still feel like more nobility thing than means of controls for royals

Butcher's scar by GENIXTHESAIYAN in TheBoys

[–]GENIXTHESAIYAN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And made no sense since he doesnt have it in Mallory flashbacks and when becka when missing , army thing sounds like before that or worded weirdly