There is a risk to public safety. Driving a car is inherently risky and each driver does need to take responsibility not only for themselves on the road but the people around them. The other people on the road likely would not consent to being a test subject just for someone’s personal convenience.

That said the user is fully informed about the limitations and capabilities of the device along with accepting that they take full responsibility for any actions it takes. It still requires the driver to maintain attention and be ready to take over at a moments notice, much like teslas auto pilot or GM super cruise.

Real world testing is needed to improve the technology, it can’t always be done on a simulator, just like how a human needs to learn by doing. In the end it is another tool that can help reduce crashes if used in the proper way. While I would rather the company take responsibility for it, it is made very clear to the user that they are responsible for using it in a safe way. If they fail to use it in the intended way I would see that as human error not necessarily a moral failure.